Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2013.18.4.432

Gimballing Flywheel and its Novel Reluctance Force-type Magnetic Bearing with Low Eddy Loss and Slight Tilting Torque  

Tang, Jiqiang (School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Beihang University)
Wang, Chun'e (School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Beihang University)
Xiang, Biao (School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Beihang University)
Publication Information
Abstract
For magnetically suspended flywheel (MSFW) with gimballing capability, demerits of Lorentz force-type magnetic bearings and common reluctance force-type magnetic bearings are analyzed, a novel reluctance forcetype magnetic bearing (RFMB) including radial and axial magnetic bearing units with 4 separate biased permanent magnets and two conical stators is presented. By equivalent magnetic circuits' method, its magnetic properties are analyzed. To reduce the eddy loss, it was designed as radial poles with shoes and its rotor made of Iron-based amorphousness. Although the uniformity of magnetic flux density in the conical air gap determines mainly the additional tilting torque, the maximum additional tilting torques is 0.05Nm and the rotor tilting has no influence on its forces when the rotor tilts or the maximum changes does not exceed 14% when the rotor drifts and tilts simultaneously. The MSFW with this RFMB can meet the maneuvering requirement of spacecraft theoretically.
Keywords
reluctance force-type magnetic bearing (RFMB); gimballing flywheel; tilting; additional torque;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 B. Penne, C. Tobehn, M. Kassebom, and B. Ziegler, Proceedings of AIAA the 57th International Astronautical Congress, Valencia, Spain (2006).
2 P. Butz and U. Renner, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Small Satellites Systems and Services, Annecy, France (1996).
3 P. Silvestrin, Journal of Annual Review in Control 29, 247 (2005).   DOI   ScienceOn
4 V. Lappas, D. Richie, C. Hall, J. Fausz, and B. Wilson, J. Guid Control Dynam 32, 354 (2009).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 A. Nakajima and C. Murakami, Technical Report of National Aerospace Laboratory, TR-820T (1984).
6 T. Hashimoto, T. Hamasaki, I. Nakatani, and K. Ninomiya, AIAA-93-3844-CP (1993).
7 Y.C . Xie, H. Sawada, and T. Hashimoto, Report of Institute of Space and Astronautic Science 680 (2001).
8 J. G. Bitterly, IEEE Aero. El. Sys. Mag. 13, 13 (1998).
9 K. R. Rajagopal and K. K. Sivadasan, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 6994 (2002).   DOI   ScienceOn
10 J. C. Fang and Y. Ren, IEEE Trans. Ind Electron. 58, 4331 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 B. Gerlach, H. M. Ehinger, and R. Seiler, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, California, Aug (2005).
12 H. Sawada, T. Hashimoto, and K. Ninomiya, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Denver CO, Aug (2000).
13 Y. Kim, R. Beach, A. Palazzolo, and A. Provenza, Proceedings of the 1st International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia (2003).
14 U. Bichler and T. Eckardt, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Magnetic Bearings, Jun. 6-8, ETH Zurich, Switzerland (1988).
15 K. Yabuuchi, M. Inoue, S. Akishita, et al., Proceedings of the 17th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, California (1983).
16 H. Y. Kim and C. W. Lee, Mechatronics 16, 13 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
17 J. C. Fang, J. J. Sun, H. Liu, and J. Q. Tang, IEEE Trans. Magn 46, 4034 (2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
18 J. J. Sun, and J. C. Fang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323, 202 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
19 J. Q. Tang, J. J. Sun, J. C. Fang, and S. Z. Sam Ge, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 329, 153 (2013).   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Y. Horiuchi and M. Inoue, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Magnetic Bearings, ETH, Zurich (2000).
21 J. Watkins, G. Brown, and K. Blumenstock, Proceedings of the 33rd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Athens, OH (2001).