Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2012.17.3.225

Pulsed Ultrasound and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field in the Treatment of Muscle Contusion in Rats  

Cheon, Song-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Young-San University)
Lee, Sun-Min (Department of Occupational Therapy, Dong-ju College)
Publication Information
Abstract
Muscle contusion usually results from a direct blunt impact and is frequently associated with contact sports. Muscle contusion results from microscopic muscle fiber and capillary disruption causing a microhemorrhage dissecting torn fibers and remaining viable muscle fibers. Recent studies concluded that some physical methods, including pulsed ultrasound (PU) and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment, accelerate and facilitate wound healing, improve scar quality and have beneficial effects on muscle and tendon healing. However, there are few studies on the effects of the early use of physical methods, such as PU and PEMF, on the expression of neurotrophic factors. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the early application of PU and PEMF, measured through the expression of BDNF in the muscles (gastrocnemius) and spinal cords of rats after skeletal muscle contusion. In the spinal cords and muscles, there was a significant increase of BDNF expression in the PEMF and PU groups, a greater increase was found in the PEMF group than in the PU group. In conclusion, PEMF is a useful therapeutic method that improves muscle healing after muscle contusion.
Keywords
pulse ultrasound; pulse electromagnetic fields; muscle injury; BDNF;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
1 T. Omura, M. Sano, K. Omura, T. Hasegawa, M. Doi, T. Sawada, and A. Nagano, J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 10, 293 (2005).   DOI   ScienceOn
2 H. Demir, P. Menku, M. Kirnap, M. Calis, and I. Ikizceli, Lasers Surg. Med. 35, 84 (2004).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 K. G. Whang, T. H. Cho, Y. M. Song, D. G. Kim, S. H. Han, I. S. Kim, and S. J. Whang, J. Korean. Assoc. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 29, 123 (2007).
4 C. Rubin, M. Bolander, J. P. Ryaby, and M. Hadjiargyrou, J. Bone Joint Surg. 83, 259 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 C. A. Bassett, J. Cell Biochem. 51, 387 (1993).   DOI   ScienceOn
6 P. C. Silveira, E. G. Victor, D. L. Schefer, L. A. Silva, E. L. Streck, M. M. Paula, and R. A. Pinho, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 44 (2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
7 C. J. McCarthy, M. J. Callaghan, and J. A. Oldham, BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 7, 51 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 R. F. de Oliveira, D. A. A. P. Oliveira, and C. P. Soares, Arch. Med. Sci. 7, 224 (2011).
9 A. F. Schinder and M. Poo, Trends Neurosci. 23, 639 (2000).   DOI   ScienceOn
10 C. Clow and B. J. Jasmin, Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2182 (2010).   DOI
11 J. H. Kang, S. Y. Park, and Y. S. Lee, J. Magnetics 16, 253 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
12 M. H. Kim and S. H. Cheon, J. Magnetics 17, 68 (2012).   DOI   ScienceOn
13 S. B. Charge and M. A. Rudnicki, Physiol. Rev. 84, 209 (2004).   DOI   ScienceOn
14 E. V. Pitts, S. Potluri, D. M. Hess, and R. J. Balice-Gordon, Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 44, 21 (2006).
15 J. B. Woodhouse and E. G. McNally, An Update Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI 32, 91 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
16 L. F. Reichardt, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 361, 1545 (2006).   DOI   ScienceOn
17 E. J. Huang and L. F. Reichardt, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 677 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn