Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2004.9.4.101

Influence of Roller Speed on Magnetic Properties and Structures of α-Fe/Nd2Fe14B Nanocomposite Magnets Prepared by Melt-spinning  

Pei, Wenli (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University)
Lian, Fazeng (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University)
Fu, Meng (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University)
Zhou, Guiqin (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University)
Takahashi, M. (Department of Electronic Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The crystallization behaviours of nanocomposite made by a function of quenching rate (roller speed) were studied. The results showed that there was one step c$\mathbb{r}$ystallization process for the alloy quenched at roller speed of 32 m/s, which could be shown as, Am (amorphouse) + ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{14}B$ ${\rightarrow}$ ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{14}B$ . For the alloy quenched at roller speed of 40 m/s, there was steps crystallization process taking place at different temperatures, which could be shown as, Am ${\rightarrow}$ ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{23}B_3+Nd_2Fe_{14}B+Am`$ ${\rightarrow}$ ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{14}B$. The presence of transition phase ($Nd_2Fe_{23}B_3$) was harmful to get fine and uniform grain size during crystallization process. Uniform microstructures and high magnetic properties could be attained for the as-quenched alloy containing less amorphous phase and no presence of transition phase during annealing treatment. For the alloy prepared at roller speed of 32 m/s, the following properties were obtained, $B_r= 0.904 T,_iH_c = 801 kA/m, (BH)_{max} = 122 kJ/m^3 and M_r/M_s = 0.6$.
Keywords
Nanocomposite; Melt-spun ribbons; Annealing; Crystallization; Exchange interaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 R. Coehoorn, D. B. Mooij de, and C. Waard de, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 80, 101 (1989)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 E. F. Kneller, and R. Hawing, IEEE. Trans. Magn. 27, 3588 (1991)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 R. Skomsk, and T. M. D. Coey, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15812 (1993)
4 A. Manaf, R. A. Buckley, and H. A. Davies, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 128,302 (1993).   DOI   ScienceOn
5 E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Phys. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A. 240, 599 (1948).   DOI
6 L. Withanawasam, G. C. Hadjipanayis, and R. F. Krause, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6646 (1994)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 W. Gong, G. C. Hadjipanayis, and R. F. Krause, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6649 (1994).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 X. K. Sun, J. Zhang, Y. L. Chu, W. Liu, B. Z. Chui, and Z. D. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1740 (1999).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 R. Fischer, T. Schrefl, H. Kronmuller, and J. Fidler, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 150,329 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn