Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.4.049

Individual and collective responsibility to enhance regulatory compliance of the Three Rs  

Choe, Byung In (Division of Institutional Review and Research Ethics, Nicholas Cardinal Cheong Graduate School for Life, The Catholic University of Korea)
Lee, Gwi Hyang (Division of Institutional Review and Research Ethics, Nicholas Cardinal Cheong Graduate School for Life, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
BMB Reports / v.47, no.4, 2014 , pp. 179-183 More about this Journal
Abstract
Investigators planning to use animals in their research and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) members who review the research protocols must take personal responsibility for ensuring that they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties, applying the Three Rs principles of Russell and Burch. The two Korean laws introduced in 2008 and 2009 regulating animal use for scientific purposes in line with the Three Rs principles have been revised a total of 11 times over the last 6 years. Both regulatory agencies, e.g., the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, provide regular training based on the legal requirements. Based on the amended Animal Welfare Act, the IACUC appointment framework has been upgraded: appointments are now for two-year terms and require a qualified training certificate issued by the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency since 2012. The authors reviewed the current curricular programs and types of training conducted by the two governing agencies through Internet searches. Our Internet survey results suggest that: a) diversity should be provided in training curricula, based on the roles, backgrounds and needs of the individual trainees; b) proper and continued educational programs should be provided, based on trainees' experiences; and c) active encouragement by government authorities can improve the quality of training curricula.
Keywords
Curricula; IACUC; Internet survey; Law; Three Rs;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. http://www.law.go.kr (Accessed 2.7.14).
2 Lee, G. H., Choe, B. I., Kim, J. S., Hart, L. A. and Han, J. S. (2010) Current status of animal use and alternatives in Korean veterinary medical schools. ATLA 38, 221-230.
3 Choe, B. I. and Lee, G. H. (2013) Searching and review on the Three Rs information in Korea: time for quality assessment and continued education. BMB Rep. 46, 335-337.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Franco, N. H. and Olsson, I. A. S. (2014) Scientists and the 3Rs: attitudes to animal use in biomedical research and the effect of mandatory training in laboratory animal science. Lab. Animal. 48, 50-60.   DOI
5 Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency. http://aec.qia.go.kr (Accessed 2.7.14).
6 Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. http://www.mfds.go.kr (Accessed 2.7.14).
7 Animal Welfare Act. http://www.law.go.kr (Accessed 2.7.14).
8 Laboratory Animal Law. http://www.law.go.kr (Accessed 2. 7.14).
9 Anderson, L. C. (2007) Institutional and IACUC Responsibilities for Animal Care and Use Education and Training Programs. ILAR J. 48, 90-5.   DOI
10 Balcombe, J. (2000) A global overview of law and policy concerning animal use in education. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M. E. Halder), 1343-1350. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV.
11 Hart, L. A., Wood, M. W. and Hart, B. L. (2008) Why dissection? Animal use in education. 93-109. Westport, Connecticut, the United States of America, Greenwood Press.
12 Nesdill, D. and Adams, K. M. (2011) Literature search strategies to comply with institutional animal care and use committee review requirements. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 38, 150-156.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Food and Agriculture Officials Training Institute. http://www.ati.go.kr (Accessed 02.25.14).
14 Hudson-Shore, M. (2012) Searching Effectively for Three Rs information. ATLA 40, 22-23.
15 CITI-KOREA. https://www.citiprogram.org (Accessed 02. 25.14).
16 Crawford, R. L. and Allen, T. (2008) Databases for biomedical animal resources. In P. M. Conn (ed.), Sourcebook of Models for Biomedical Research 49-54. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.