Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2207.07013

Novel High-Throughput DNA Part Characterization Technique for Synthetic Biology  

Bak, Seong-Kun (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Seong, Wonjae (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Rha, Eugene (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Lee, Hyewon (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Kim, Seong Keun (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Kwon, Kil Koang (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Kim, Haseong (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Lee, Seung-Goo (Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.32, no.8, 2022 , pp. 1026-1033 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study presents a novel DNA part characterization technique that increases throughput by combinatorial DNA part assembly, solid plate-based quantitative fluorescence assay for phenotyping, and barcode tagging-based long-read sequencing for genotyping. We confirmed that the fluorescence intensities of colonies on plates were comparable to fluorescence at the single-cell level from a high-end, flow-cytometry device and developed a high-throughput image analysis pipeline. The barcode tagging-based long-read sequencing technique enabled rapid identification of all DNA parts and their combinations with a single sequencing experiment. Using our techniques, forty-four DNA parts (21 promoters and 23 RBSs) were successfully characterized in 72 h without any automated equipment. We anticipate that this high-throughput and easy-to-use part characterization technique will contribute to increasing part diversity and be useful for building genetic circuits and metabolic pathways in synthetic biology.
Keywords
Synthetic biology; DNA parts; circuit design; long-read sequencing; image analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shao B, Rammohan J, Anderson DA, Alperovich N, Ross D, Voigt CA. 2021. Single-cell measurement of plasmid copy number and promoter activity. Nat. Commun. 12: 1475.   DOI
2 Zhang X, Brainard DH. 2004. Estimation of saturated pixel values in digital color imaging. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 21: 2301-2310.   DOI
3 Nunez I, Matute T, Herrera R, Keymer J, Marzullo T, Rudge T, et al. 2017. Low cost and open source multi-fluorescence imaging system for teaching and research in biology and bioengineering. PLoS One 12: e0187163.   DOI
4 Engler C, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S. 2008. A One pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One 3: e3647.   DOI
5 Feng Y, Zhang Y, Ying C, Wang D, Du C. 2015. Nanopore-based fourth-generation DNA sequencing technology. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 13: 4-16.   DOI
6 Nielsen AAK, Segall-Shapiro TH, Voigt CA. 2013. Advances in genetic circuit design: novel biochemistries, deep part mining, and precision gene expression. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17: 878-892.   DOI
7 Fuller CW, Kumar S, Porel M, Chien M, Bibillo A, Stranges PB, et al. 2016. Real-time single-molecule electronic DNA sequencing by synthesis using polymer-tagged nucleotides on a nanopore array. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5233-5238.   DOI
8 Hossain A, Lopez E, Halper SM, Cetnar DP, Reis AC, Strickland D, et al. 2020. Automated design of thousands of nonrepetitive parts for engineering stable genetic systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 38: 1466-1475.   DOI
9 Huynh L, Tagkopoulos I. 2014. Optimal part and module selection for synthetic gene circuit design automation. ACS Synth. Biol. 3: 556-564.   DOI
10 Nielsen AAK, Der BS, Shin J, Vaidyanathan P, Paralanov V, Strychalski EA, et al. 2016. Genetic circuit design automation. Science 352: aac7341.   DOI
11 Appleton E, Madsen C, Roehner N, Densmore D. 2017. Design automation in synthetic biology. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 9: a023978.   DOI
12 Li H. 2018. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34: 3094-3100.   DOI
13 Vick JE, Johnson ET, Choudhary S, Bloch SE, Lopez-Gallego F, Srivastava P, et al. 2011. Optimized compatible set of BioBrickTM vectors for metabolic pathway engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 92: 1275-1286.   DOI
14 Potapov V, Ong JL, Kucera RB, Langhorst BW, Bilotti K, Pryor JM, et al. 2018. Comprehensive profiling of four base overhang ligation fidelity by T4 DNA ligase and application to DNA assembly. ACS Synth. Biol. 7: 2665-2674.   DOI
15 Geissmann Q. 2013. OpenCFU, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects. PLoS One 8: e54072.   DOI
16 De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34: 2666-2669.   DOI
17 Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. 2019. Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol. 20: 129.   DOI
18 Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. 2009. The Sequence alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.   DOI
19 Buschmann T, Bystrykh L V. 2013. Levenshtein error-correcting barcodes for multiplexed DNA sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 14: 272.   DOI
20 DebRoy HP and PA and RG and S. 2020. Efficient manipulation of biological strings. Biostrings doi. 10.18129/B9.bioc.Biostrings.   DOI
21 Yeom SJ, Kim M, Kwon KK, Fu Y, Rha E, Park SH, et al. 2018. A synthetic microbial biosensor for high-throughput screening of lactam biocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 9: 5053.   DOI
22 Day RN, Davidson MW. 2009. The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38: 2887-2921.   DOI
23 Henkin TM. 2000. Transcription termination control in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3: 149-153.   DOI
24 Voigt CA. 2006. Genetic parts to program bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17: 548-557.   DOI
25 Endy D. 2005. Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 438: 449-453.   DOI
26 Canton B, Labno A, Endy D. 2008. Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nat. Biotechnol. 26: 787-793.   DOI
27 Chen YJ, Liu P, Nielsen AAK, Brophy JAN, Clancy K, Peterson T, et al. 2013. Characterization of 582 natural and synthetic terminators and quantification of their design constraints. Nat. Methods 10: 659-664.   DOI
28 Kelly JR, Rubin AJ, Davis JH, Ajo-Franklin CM, Cumbers J, Czar MJ, et al. 2009. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard. J. Biol. Eng. 3: 4.   DOI
29 Huang HH, Camsund D, Lindblad P, Heidorn T. 2010. Design and characterization of molecular tools for a synthetic biology approach towards developing cyanobacterial biotechnology. Nucleic Acids Res. 38: 2577-2593.   DOI
30 Schaumberg KA, Antunes MS, Kassaw TK, Xu W, Zalewski CS, Medford JI, et al. 2015. Quantitative characterization of genetic parts and circuits for plant synthetic biology. Nat. Methods 13: 94-100.
31 French S, Coutts BE, Brown ED. 2018. Open-source high-throughput phenomics of bacterial promoter-reporter strains. Cell Syst. 7: 339-346.e3.   DOI
32 Esling P, Lejzerowicz F, Pawlowski J. 2015. Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 43: 2513-2524.   DOI