Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1608.08062

Evaluation of Biogas Production Performance and Dynamics of the Microbial Community in Different Straws  

Li, Xue (Yanbian University)
Liu, Yan-Hua (Yanbian University)
Zhang, Xin (Yanbian University)
Ge, Chang-Ming (Yanbian University)
Piao, Ren-Zhe (Yanbian University)
Wang, Wei-Dong (Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University)
Cui, Zong-Jun (China Agriculture University)
Zhao, Hong-Yan (Yanbian University)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.27, no.3, 2017 , pp. 524-534 More about this Journal
Abstract
The development and utilization of crop straw biogas resources can effectively alleviate the shortage of energy, environmental pollution, and other issues. This study performed a continuous batch test at $35^{\circ}C$ to assess the methane production potential and volatile organic acid contents using the modified Gompertz equation. Illumina MiSeq platform sequencing, which is a sequencing method based on sequencing-by-synthesis, was used to compare the archaeal community diversity, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was used to analyze the bacterial community diversity in rice straw, dry maize straw, silage maize straw, and tobacco straw. The results showed that cumulative gas production values for silage maize straw, rice straw, dry maize straw, and tobacco straw were 4,870, 4,032.5, 3,907.5, and $3,628.3ml/g{\cdot}VS$, respectively, after 24 days. Maximum daily gas production values of silage maize straw and rice straw were 1,025 and $904.17ml/g{\cdot}VS$, respectively, followed by tobacco straw and dry maize straw. The methane content of all four kinds of straws was > 60%, particularly that of silage maize straw, which peaked at 67.3%. Biogas production from the four kinds of straw was in the order silage maize straw > rice straw > dry maize straw > tobacco straw, and the values were 1,166.7, 1,048.4, 890, and $637.4ml/g{\cdot}VS$, respectively. The microbial community analysis showed that metabolism was mainly carried out by acetate-utilizing methanogens, and that Methanosarcina was the dominant archaeal genus in the four kinds of straw, and the DGGE bands belonged to the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi. Silage maize is useful for biogas production because it contains four kinds of straw.
Keywords
Straw; anaerobic fermentation; microbial community;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yuan X. 2011. Enhancing the anaerobic digestion of corn stalks using composite microbial pretreatment. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 746-752.   DOI
2 Fu S-F, Wang F, Shi X-S, Guo R-B. 2016. Impacts of microaeration on the anaerobic digestion of corn straw and the microbial community structure. Chem. Eng. J. 287: 523-528.   DOI
3 Liew LN, Shi J, Li Y. 2012. Methane production from solidstate anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 46: 125-132.   DOI
4 Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T. 2012. Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16: 1462-1476.   DOI
5 Wang XJ, Yang GH, Feng YZ, Ren GX. 2011. Potential for biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of dairy and chicken manure with corn stalks. Adv. Mater. Res. 347-353: 2484-2492.   DOI
6 Cho SK, Im WT, Kim DH, Kim MH, Shin HS, Oh SE. 2013. Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions: performance and methanogenic community analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 131: 210-217.   DOI
7 Xu F, Li Y. 2012. Solid-state co-digestion of expired dog food and corn stover for methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 118: 219-226.   DOI
8 Zhang B, Zhao H, Yu H, Chen D, Li X, Wang W, et al. 2016. Evaluation of biogas production performance and archaeal microbial dynamics of corn straw during anaerobic codigestion with cattle manure liquid. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 739-747.   DOI
9 Ren J, Yuan X, Li J, Ma X, Zhao Y, Zhu W, et al. 2014. Performance and microbial community dynamics in a twophase anaerobic co-digestion system using cassava dregs and pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 155: 342-351.   DOI
10 Qiao JT, Qiu YL, Yuan XZ, Shi XS, Xu XH, Guo RB. 2013. Molecular characterization of bacterial and archaeal communities in a full-scale anaerobic reactor treating corn straw. Bioresour. Technol. 143: 512-518.   DOI
11 Zheng Z, Liu J, Yuan X, Wang X, Zhu W, Yang F, Cui Z. 2015. Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion. Appl. Energy 151: 249-257.   DOI
12 Zhao H, Li J, Li J, Yuan X, Piao R, Zhu W, et al. 2013. Organic loading rate shock impact on operation and microbial communities in different anaerobic fixed-bed reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 140: 211-219.   DOI
13 Li JJ, Zicari SM, Cui ZJ, Zhang RH. 2014. Processing anaerobic sludge for extended storage as anaerobic digester inoculum. Bioresour. Technol. 166: 201-210.   DOI
14 Zhao H, Yu H, Yuan X, Piao R, Li H, Wang X, Cui Z. 2014. Degradation of lignocelluloses in rice straw by BMC-9, a composite microbial system. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 585-591.   DOI
15 Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L. 2003. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants: status and future trends. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 109: 95-105.   DOI
16 Lu Q, Yi J, Yang D. 2016. Comparative analysis of performance and microbial characteristics between high-solid and lowsolid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 110-119.   DOI
17 Song Z, Zhang C. 2015. Anaerobic codigestion of pretreated wheat straw with cattle manure and analysis of the microbial community. Bioresour. Technol. 186: 128-135.   DOI
18 Wei S, Zhang H, Cai X, Xu J, Fang J, Liu H. 2014. Psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion of highland barley straw with two animal manures at high altitude for enhancing biogas production. Energy Convers. Manag. 88: 40-48.   DOI
19 Yan Z, Song Z, Li D, Yuan Y, Liu X, Zheng T. 2015. The effects of initial substrate concentration, C/N ratio, and temperature on solid-state anaerobic digestion from composting rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 177: 266-273.   DOI
20 Zhou S, Zhang Y, Dong Y. 2012. Pretreatment for biogas production by anaerobic fermentation of mixed corn stover and cow dung. Energy 46: 644-648.   DOI
21 Cuetos MJ, Fernandez C, Gomez X, Moran A. 2011. Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with energy crop residues. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 16: 1044-1052.   DOI
22 Budzianowski WM. 2016. A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54: 1148-1171.   DOI
23 Wang X, Yang G, Li F, Feng Y, Ren G. 2013. Response surface optimization of methane potentials in anaerobic codigestion of multiple substrates: dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Waste Manag. Res. 31: 60-66.   DOI
24 Haruta S, Cui Z, Huang Z, Li M, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. 2002. Construction of a stable microbial community with high cellulose-degradation ability. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59: 529-534.   DOI
25 Li A, Chu Y, Wang X, Ren L, Yu J, Liu X, et al. 2013. A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methaneproducing microbial community in solid-state biogas reactor. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6: 2-17.   DOI
26 Oberauner L, Zachow C, Lackner S, Hogenauer C, Smolle KH, Berg G. 2013. The ignored diversity: complex bacterial communities in intensive care units revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. Sci. Rep. 3: 1413.   DOI
27 Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 695-700.
28 Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 403-405.   DOI
29 Yuan X, Wen B, Ma X, Zhu W, Wang X, Chen S, Cui Z. 2014. Enhancing the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose of municipal solid waste using a microbial pretreatment method. Bioresour. Technol. 154: 1-9.   DOI
30 Lissens G, Thomsen AB, De Baere L, Verstraete W, Ahring BK. 2004. Thermal wet oxidation improves anaerobic biodegradability of raw and digested biowaste. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38: 3418-3424.   DOI
31 Ren H, Yao X, Li J, Li Z, Wang X, Wang C, et al. 2014. Effect of maize straw storage practice on biogas production performance during anaerobic co-digestion with cattle manure. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 30: 213-222.
32 Munk B, Bauer C, Gronauer A, Lebuhn M. 2010. Population dynamics of methanogens during acidification of biogas fermenters fed with maize silage. Eng. Life Sci. 10: 496-508.   DOI
33 Gao R, Yuan X, Li J, Li J, Ren J, Wang X, Cui Z. 2012. Acidification of four kinds of lignocelluloses materials in cow dung liquid. Trans. China Soc. Agric. Eng. 28: 199-204.
34 Buyukkamaci N, Filibeli A. 2004. Volatile fatty acid formation in an anaerobic hybrid reactor. Process Biochem. 39: 1491-1494.   DOI
35 O'Sullivan CA, Burrell PC. 2007. The effect of media changes on the rate of cellulose solubilisation by rumen and digester derived microbial communities. Waste Manag. 27: 1808-1814.   DOI
36 Kengo S, Masahiko M, Shin-Ichi H, Daisuke S, Naoya O, Yasuo I. 2010. Efficient degradation of rice straw in the reactors packed by carbon fiber textiles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87: 1579-1586.   DOI
37 Heeg K, Pohl M, Sontag M, Mumme J, Klocke M, Nettmann E. 2014. Microbial communities involved in biogas production from wheat straw as the sole substrate within a two-phase solid-state anaerobic digestion. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 37: 590-600.   DOI
38 Wang Y, Sheng HF, He Y, Wu JY, Jiang YX, Tam NF, Zhou HW. 2012. Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 8264-8271.   DOI
39 Liu C-L, Wang X-F, Wang X-J, Li P-P, Cui Z-J. 2010. The character of normal temperature straw-rotting microbial community. Agric. Sci. China 9: 713-720.   DOI
40 Zhao H, Li J, Liu J, Lu Y, Wang X, Cui Z. 2013. Microbial community dynamics during biogas slurry and cow manure compost. J. Integr. Agric. 12: 1087-1097.   DOI
41 Kashyap DR, Dadhich KS, Sharma SK. 2003. Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 87: 147-153.   DOI
42 Lo Y-C, Saratale GD, Chen W-M, Bai M-D, Chang J-S. 2009. Isolation of cellulose-hydrolytic bacteria and applications of the cellulolytic enzymes for cellulosic biohydrogen production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 44: 417-425.   DOI
43 Yuan X, Ma L, Wen B, Zhou D, Kuang M, Yang W, Cui Z. 2016. Enhancing anaerobic digestion of cotton stalk by pretreatment with a microbial consortium (MC1). Bioresour. Technol. 207: 293-301.   DOI
44 Yu J, Zhao Y, Liu B, Zhao Y, Wu J, Yuan X, et al. 2016. Accelerated acidification by inoculation with a microbial consortia in a complex open environment. Bioresour. Technol. 216: 294-301.   DOI