Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1601.01058

Effects of CaMSRB2-Expressing Transgenic Rice Cultivation on Soil Microbial Communities  

Sohn, Soo-In (Biosafety Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science)
Oh, Young-Ju (Institute for Future Environmental Ecology Co., Ltd)
Kim, Byung-Yong (ChunLab, Inc., Seoul National University)
Cho, Hyun-Suk (Biosafety Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.26, no.7, 2016 , pp. 1303-1310 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although many studies on the effects of genetically modified (GM) crops on soil microorganisms have been carried out over the past decades, they have provided contradictory information, even for the same GM crop, owing to the diversity of the soil environments in which they were conducted. This inconsistency in results suggests that the effects of GM crops on soil microorganisms should be considered from many aspects. In this study, we investigated the effects of the GM drought-tolerant rice MSRB2-Bar-8, which expresses the CaMSRB2 gene, on soil microorganisms based on the culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. To this end, rhizosphere soils of GM and non-GM (IM) rice were analyzed for soil chemistry, population densities of soil microorganisms, and microbial community structure (using pyrosequencing technology) at three growth stages (seedling, tillering, and maturity). There was no significant difference in the soil chemistry between GM and non-GM rice. The microbial densities of the GM soils were found to be within the range of those of the non-GM rice. In the pyrosequencing analyses, Proteobacteria and Chloroflexi were dominant at the seedling stage, while Chloroflexi showed dominance over Proteobacteria at the maturity stage in both the GM and non-GM soils. An UPGMA dendrogram showed that the soil microbial communities were clustered by growth stage. Taken together, the results from this study suggest that the effects of MSRB2-Bar-8 cultivation on soil microorganisms are not significant.
Keywords
Genetically modified rice; CaMSRB2; soil microbial community;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ezraty B, Aussel L, Barras F. 2005. Methionine sulfoxide reductases in prokaryotes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1703: 221-229.   DOI
2 Fierer N, Jackson RB. 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 626-631.   DOI
3 Hamedy M, Lozupone C, Knight R. 2010. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J 4: 17-27.   DOI
4 Hur MS, Kim YH, Song HR, Kim JM, Choi YI, Yi HN. 2011. Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77: 7611-7619.   DOI
5 Icoz I, Stotzky G. 2008. Fate and effects of insect-resistant Bt crops in soil ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40: 559-586.   DOI
6 Khodakovskaya MV, Kim BS, Kim JN, Alimohammadi M, Dervishi E, Mustafa T, Cernigla CE. 2013. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small 9: 115-123.   DOI
7 Kim JS, Park HM, Chae S, Lee TH, Hwang DJ, Oh SD, et al. 2014. A pepper MSRB2 gene confers drought tolerance in rice through the protection of chloroplast-targeted genes. PLoS One 9: e90588.   DOI
8 Lavecchia A, Curci M, Jangid K, Whitman WB, Ricciuti P, Pascazio S, Crecchio C. 2015. Microbial 16S gene-based composition of a sorghum cropped rhizosphere soil under different fertilization managements. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51: 661-672.   DOI
9 Lee JH, Yi H, Jeon YS, Won S, Chun J. 2012. TBC: a clustering algorithm based on prokaryotic taxonomy. J. Microbiol. 50: 181-185.   DOI
10 Lee SH, Kim CG, Kang H. 2011. Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem. Microb. Ecol. 61: 646-659.   DOI
11 Liu B, Zeng Q, Yan F, Xu H, Xu C. 2005. Effect of transgenic plants on soil microorganisms. Plant Soil 271: 1-13.   DOI
12 Malagoli P, Laine P, Le Deunff E, Rossato L, Ney B, Ourry A. 2004. Modeling nitrogen uptake in oilseed rape cv Capitol during a growth cycle using influx kinetics of root nitrate transport systems and field experimental data. Plant Physiol. 134: 388-400.   DOI
13 Moskovitz J, Bar-Noy S, Williams WM, Requena J, Berlett BS, Stadtman ER. 2001. Methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrA) is a regulator of antioxidant defense and lifespan in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12920-12925.   DOI
14 NIAST. 2000. Methods of Soil Chemical Analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea.
15 Talbot JM, Bruns TD, Smith DP, Branco S, Glassman SI, Erlandson S, et al. 2013. Independent roles of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic communities in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57: 282-291.   DOI
16 Rodrigo MJ, Moskovitz J, Salamini F, Bartels D. 2002. Reverse genetic approaches in plants and yeast suggest a role for novel, evolutionarily conserved, selenoprotein-related genes in oxidative stress defense. Mol. Genet. Genomics 267: 613-621.   DOI
17 Rousk J, Brookes PC, Baath E. 2010. The microbial PLFA composition as affected by pH in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42: 516-520.   DOI
18 Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. 2011. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One 6: e27310.   DOI
19 Todaka D, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2015. Recent advances in the dissection of drought-stress regulatory networks and strategies for development of drought-tolerant transgenic rice plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6: 84.   DOI
20 Waldrop MP, Firestone MK. 2006. Response of microbial community composition and function to soil climate change. Microb. Ecol. 52: 716-724.   DOI
21 Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR. 2000. The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290: 2088-2093.   DOI
22 Zahran HH. 1999. Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63: 968-989.
23 Zhang J, Subramanian S, Stacey G, Yu O. 2009. Flavones and flavonols play distinct critical roles during nodulation of Medicago truncatula by Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant J. 57: 171-183.   DOI
24 Caraux G, Pinloche S. 2005. PermutMatrix: a graphical environment to arrange gene expression profiles in optimal linear order. Bioinformatics 21: 1280-1281.   DOI
25 Arjun JK, Harikrishnan K. 2011. Metagenomic analysis of bacterial diversity in the rice rhizosphere soil microbiome. Biotechnol. Bioinform. Bioeng. 1: 361-367.
26 Bakker MG, Chaparro JM, Manter DK, Vivanco JM. 2015. Impacts of bulk soil microbial community structure on rhizosphere microbiomes of Zea mays. Plant Soil 392: 115-126.   DOI
27 Bardgett RD, Dentin CS, Cook R. 1999. Below-ground herbivory promotes soil nutrient transfer and root growth in grassland. Ecol. Lett. 2: 357-360.   DOI
28 Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Bakker MG, Sugiyama A, Manter DK, Vivanco JM. 2013. Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PLoS One 8: e55731.   DOI
29 Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Vivanco JM. 2014. Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 8: 790-803.   DOI
30 DeForest JL, Scott LG. 2010. Available organic soil phosphorus has an important influence on microbial community composition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 74: 2059-2066.
31 Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Noah F. 2012. Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: the strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 50: 58-65.   DOI