Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1608.08053

Production of Methanol from Methane by Encapsulated Methylosinus sporium  

Patel, Sanjay K.S. (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Jeong, Jae-Hoon (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Mehariya, Sanjeet (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Otari, Sachin V. (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Madan, Bharat (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Haw, Jung Rim (Department of Materials Chemistry and Engineering, Konkuk University)
Lee, Jung-Kul (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Zhang, Liaoyuan (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Kim, In-Won (Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.26, no.12, 2016 , pp. 2098-2105 More about this Journal
Abstract
Massive reserves of methane ($CH_4$) remain unexplored as a feedstock for the production of liquid fuels and chemicals, mainly because of the lack of economically suitable and sustainable strategies for selective oxidation of $CH_4$ to methanol. The present study demonstrates the bioconversion of $CH_4$ to methanol mediated by Type I methanotrophs, such as Methylomicrobium album and Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum. Furthermore, immobilization of a Type II methanotroph, Methylosinus sporium, was carried out using different encapsulation methods, employing sodium-alginate (Na-alginate) and silica gel. The encapsulated cells demonstrated higher stability for methanol production. The optimal pH, temperature, and agitation rate were determined to be pH 7.0, $30^{\circ}C$, and 175 rpm, respectively, using inoculum (1.5 mg of dry cell mass/ml) and 20% of $CH_4$ as a feed. Under these conditions, maximum methanol production (3.43 and 3.73 mM) by the encapsulated cells was recorded. Even after six cycles of reuse, the Na-alginate and silica gel encapsulated cells retained 61.8% and 51.6% of their initial efficiency for methanol production, respectively, in comparison with the efficiency of 11.5% observed in the case of free cells. These results suggest that encapsulation of methanotrophs is a promising approach to improve the stability of methanol production.
Keywords
Methanotroph; Methylosinus sporium; immobilization; methane bioconversion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Duan C, Luo M, Xing X. 2011. High-rate conversion of methane to methanol by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 7349-7353.   DOI
2 Ge X, Yang L, Sheets JP, Yu Z, Li Y. 2014. Biological conversion of methane to liquid fuels: status and opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 32: 1460-1475.   DOI
3 Hur DH, Na J-G, Lee EY. 2016. Highly efficient bioconversion of methane to methanol using a novel type I Methylomonas sp. DH-1 newly isolated from brewery waste sludge. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5007.   DOI
4 Kumar P, Patel SKS, Lee J-K, Kalia VC. 2013. Extending the limits of Bacillus for novel biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 31: 1543-1561.   DOI
5 Pierie F, Van Someren CEJ, Benders RMJ, Bekkering J, Van Gemert WJT, Moll HC. 2015. Environmental and energy system analysis of bio-methane production pathways: a comparison between feedstocks and process optimizations. Appl. Energy 160: 456-466.   DOI
6 Patel SKS, Selvaraj C, Mardina P, Jeong J-H, Kalia VC, Kang Y-C, Lee J-K. 2016. Enhancement of methanol production from synthetic gas mixture by Methylosinus sporium through covalent immobilization. Appl. Energy 171: 383-391.   DOI
7 Patel SKS, Singh M, Kumar P, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. 2012. Exploitation of defined bacterial cultures for production of hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from pea-shells. Biomass Bioenergy 36: 218-225.   DOI
8 Pen N, Soussan L, Belleville M-P, Sanchez J, Charmette C, Paolucci-Jeanjean D. 2014. An innovative membrane bioreactor for methane biohydroxylation. Bioresour. Technol. 174: 42-52.   DOI
9 Ra CH, Jung JH, Sunwoo IY, Kang CH, Jeong G-T, Kim S-K. 2015. Detoxification of Eucheuma spinosum hydrolysates with activated carbon for ethanol production by the salt-tolerant yeast Candida tropicalis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 856-862.   DOI
10 Ramachandran P, Jagtap SS, Patel SKS, Li J, Kang YC, Lee J-K. 2016. Role of the non-conserved amino acid asparagine 285 in the glycone-binding pocket of Neosartorya fischeri ${\beta}$-glucosidase. RSC Adv. 6: 48137-48144.   DOI
11 Razumovsky SD, Efremenko EN, Makhlis TA, Senko OV, Bikhovsky MY, Podmaster'ev VV, Varfolomeev SD. 2008. Effect of immobilization on the main dynamic characteristics of the enzymatic oxidation of methane to methanol by bacteria Methylosinus sporium B-2121. Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 57: 1633-1636.   DOI
12 Ricci MA, Russo A, Pisano I, Palmieri L, Angelis MD, Agrimi G. 2015. Improved 1,3-propanediol synthesis from glycerol by the robust Lactobacillus reuteri strain DSM 20016. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 893-902.   DOI
13 Senko O, Makhlis T, Bihovsky M, Podmasterev V, Efremenko E, Razumovsky S, Varfolomeyev S. 2007. Methanol production in the flow system with immobilized cells Methylosinus sporium. XV International Workshop on Bioencapsulation. Vienna, Austria, September 6-8, P2-16: 1-4.
14 Sheets JP, Ge X, Li Y-F, Yu Z, Li Y. 2016. Biological conversion of biogas to methanol using methanotrophs isolated from solid-state anaerobic digestate. Bioresour. Technol. 201: 50-57.   DOI
15 Sigdel S, Hui G, Smith TJ, Murrell JC, Lee JK. 2015. Molecular dynamics simulation to rationalize regioselective hydroxylation of aromatic substrates by soluble methane monooxygenase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25: 1611-1615.   DOI
16 Strong PJ, Xie S, Clarke WP. 2015. Methane as a resource: can the methanotrophs add value? Environ. Sci. Technol. 49: 4001-4018.   DOI
17 Takeguchi M, Okura I. 2000. Role of iron and copper in particulate methane monooxygenase of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Catal. Surv. Jpn. 4: 51-63.   DOI
18 Hwang IY, Hur DH, Lee JH, Park C-H, Chang IS, Lee JW, Lee EY. 2015. Batch conversion of methane to methanol using Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b as biocatalyst. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 375-380.   DOI
19 Dhiman SS, Selvaraj C, Li J, Singh R, Zhao X, Kim D, et al. 2016. Phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils by the hyperaccumulator canola (Brassica napus L.) and the use of its biomass for ethanol production. Fuel 183: 107-114.   DOI
20 Fei Q, Guarnieri MT, Tao L, Laurens LML, Dowe N, Pienkos PT. 2014. Bioconversion of natural gas to liquid fuel: opportunities and challenges. Biotechnol. Adv. 32: 596-614.   DOI
21 Kim T-S, Jung H-M, Kim S-Y, Zhang L, Sigdel S, Park J-H, et al. 2015. Reduction of acetate and lactate contributed to enhancement of a recombinant protein production in E. coli BL21. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 1093-1100.   DOI
22 Kumar P, Sharma R, Ray S, Mehariya S, Patel SKS, Lee J-K, Kalia VC. 2015. Dark fermentative bioconversion of glycerol to hydrogen by Bacillus thuringiensis. Bioresour. Technol. 182: 383-388.   DOI
23 Gao H, Kim I-W, Choi J-H, Khera E, Wen F, Lee J-K. 2015. Repeated production of L-xylulose by an immobilized wholecell biocatalyst harboring L-arabinitol dehydrogenase coupled with an $NAD^+$ regeneration system. Biochem. Eng. 96: 23-28.   DOI
24 Hwang IY, Lee SH, Choi YS, Park SJ, Na JG, Chang IS, et al. 2014. Biocatalytic conversion of methane to methanol as a key step for development of methane-based biorefineries. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 1597-1605.   DOI
25 Jamil M, Ahmad F, Jeon YJ. 2016. Renewable energy technologies adopted by the UAE: prospects and challenges - a comprehensive overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55: 1181-1194.   DOI
26 Mardina P, Li J, Patel SKS, Kim I-W, Lee J-K, Selvaraj C. 2016. Potential of immobilized whole-cell Methylocella tundrae as a biocatalyst for methanol production from methane. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 1234-1241.   DOI
27 Jung S-J, Kim S-H, Chung I-M. 2015. Comparison of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose contents for biofuels utilization among 4 types of lignocellulosic crops. Biomass Bioenergy 83: 322-327.   DOI
28 Mehta PK, Mishra S, Ghose TK. 1991. Methanol biosynthesis by covalently immobilized cells of Methylosinus trichosporium: batch and continuous studies. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 37: 551-556.   DOI
29 Murrell JC, Jetten MS. 2009. The microbial methane cycle. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1: 279-284.   DOI
30 Niu X, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhao Z, Liu J, Jiang L, et al. 2013. "Fish-in-net," a novel method for cell immobilization of Zymomonas mobilis. PLoS One 8: e79569.   DOI
31 Ali H, Scanlan J, Dumont MG, Murrell JC. 2006. Duplication of the mmoX gene in Methylosinus sporium: cloning, sequencing and mutational analysis. Microbiology 152: 2931-2942.   DOI
32 Patel SKS, Lee JK, Kalia VC. 2016. Integrative approach for producing hydrogen and polyhydroxyalkanoate from mixed waste of biological origin. Indian J. Microbiol. 56: 293-300.   DOI
33 Patel SKS, Choi S-H, Kang Y-C, Lee J-K. 2016. Large-scale aerosol-assisted synthesis of biofriendly $Fe_2$$O_3$ yolk-shell particles: a promising support for enzyme immobilization. Nanoscale 8: 6728-6738.   DOI
34 Patel SKS, Kalia VC, Choi JH, Haw JR, Kim IW, Lee JK. 2014. Immobilization of laccase on SiO2 nanocarriers improves its stability and reusability. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 639-647.   DOI
35 Chi Z-F, Lu W-J, Wang H-T. 2015. Spatial patterns of methane oxidation and methanotrophic diversity in landfill cover soils of Southern China. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25: 423-430.   DOI
36 Knief C, Lipski A, Dunfield PF. 2003. Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 6703-6714.   DOI
37 Patel SKS, Kumar P, Kalia VC. 2012. Enhancing biological hydrogen production through complementary microbial metabolisms. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37: 10590-10603.   DOI
38 Patel SKS, Kumar P, Mehariya S, Purohit HJ, Lee JK, Kalia VC. 2014. Enhancement in hydrogen production by cocultures of Bacillus and Enterobacter. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39: 14663-14668.   DOI
39 Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh M, Lee JK, Kalia VC. 2015. Integrative approach to produce hydrogen and polyhydroxy alkanoate from biowaste using defined bacterial cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 176: 136-141.   DOI
40 Patel SKS, Kumar P, Singh S, Lee JK, Kalia VC. 2015. Integrative approach for hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate production, pp. 73-85. In Kalia VC (ed.). Microbial factories waste treatment. Springer, New Delhi.
41 Patel SKS, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. 2010. Dark fermentative hydrogen production by defined mixed microbial cultures immobilized on ligno-cellulosic waste materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35: 10674-10681.   DOI
42 Yoo Y-S, Hana J-S, Ahn C-M, Kim C-G. 2015. Comparative enzyme inhibitive methanol production by Methylosinus sporium from simulated biogas. Environ. Technol. 36: 983-991.   DOI
43 Patel SKS, Mardina P, Kim D, Kim S-Y, Kalia VC, Kim I-W, Lee J-K. 2016. Improvement in methanol production by regulating the composition of synthetic gas mixture and raw biogas. Bioresour. Technol. 218: 202-208.   DOI
44 Zhang W, Ge X, Li Y-F, Yu Z, Li Y. 2016. Isolation of a methanotroph from a hydrogen sulfide-rich anaerobic digester for methanol production from biogas. Process Biochem. 51: 838-844.   DOI
45 Patel SKS, Mardina P, Kim S-Y, Lee J-K, Kim I-W. 2016. Biological methanol production by a type II methanotroph Methylocystis bryophila. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26: 717-724.   DOI