1 |
Schwacha A, Kleckner N. 1997. Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123-1135.
DOI
|
2 |
Serrentino ME, Borde V. 2012. The spatial regulation of meiotic recombination hotspots: are all DSB hotspots crossover hotspots? Exp. Cell Res. 15: 1347-1352.
DOI
|
3 |
Yu HG, Koshland DE. 2003. Meiotic condensin is required for proper chromosome compaction, SC assembly, and resolution of recombination-dependent chromosome linkages. J. Cell Biol. 163: 937-947.
DOI
|
4 |
Yu HG, Koshland DE. 2005. Chromosome morphogenesis: condensin-dependent cohesin removal during meiosis. Cell 123: 397-407.
DOI
|
5 |
Zakharyevich K, Tang S, Ma Y, Hunter N. 2012. Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149: 334-347.
DOI
|
6 |
Zakharyevich K, Ma Y, Tang S, Hwang PY, Boiteux S, Hunter N. 2010. Temporally and biochemically distinct activities of Exo1 during meiosis: double-strand-break resection and resolution of double-Holliday junctions. Mol. Cells 22: 1001-1015.
DOI
|
7 |
McMahill MS, Sham CW, Bishop DK. 2007. Synthesisdependent strand annealing in meiosis. PLoS Biol. 5: e299.
DOI
|
8 |
Muñoz-Galván S, Tous C, Blanco MG, Schwartz EK, Ehmsen KT, West SC, et al. 2012. Distinct roles of Mus81, Yen1, Slx1-Slx4, and Rad1 nucleases in the repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister chromatid exchange. Mol. Cell Biol. 32: 1592-1603.
DOI
|
9 |
Murakami H, Keeney S. 2008. Regulating the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. Genes Dev. 22: 286-892.
DOI
|
10 |
Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. 2005. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436: 1053-1057.
DOI
|
11 |
Oh SD, Lao JP, Hwang PY, Taylor AF, Smith GR, Hunter N. 2007. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130: 259-272.
DOI
|
12 |
Oke A, Anderson CM, Yam P, Fung JC. 2014. Controlling meiotic recombinational repair - specifying the roles of ZMMs, Sgs1 and Mus81/Mms4 in crossover formation. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004690.
DOI
|
13 |
Panizza S, Mendoza MA, Berlinger M, Huang L, Nicolas A, Shirahige K, Klein F. 2011. Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 146: 372-383.
DOI
|
14 |
Ranjha L, Anand R, Cejka P. 2014. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mlh1-Mlh3 heterodimer is an endonuclease that preferentially binds to Holliday junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 289: 5674-5686.
DOI
|
15 |
Schwacha A, Kleckner N. 1995. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83: 783-791.
DOI
|
16 |
Hunter N. 2006. Meiotic recombination, pp. 381-442. In Aguilera A, Rothstein R (eds.). Topics in 374 Current Genetics, Molecular Genetics of Recombination. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
|
17 |
Keeney S. 2001. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52: 1-53.
DOI
|
18 |
Kim KP, Weiner BM, Zhang L, Jordan A, Dekker J, Kleckner N. 2010. Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143: 924-937.
DOI
|
19 |
Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-384.
DOI
|
20 |
Keeney S, Neale MJ. 2006. Initiation of meiotic recombination by formation of DNA double-strand breaks: mechanism and regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34: 523-525.
DOI
|
21 |
Knop M, Siegers K, Pereira G, Zachariae W, Winsor B, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15: 963-972.
DOI
|
22 |
Klein F, Mahr P, Galova M, Buonomo SB, Michaelis C, Nairz K, Nasmyth K. 1999. A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98: 91-103.
DOI
|
23 |
Lavoie BD, Hogan E, Koshland D. 2002. In vivo dissection of the chromosome condensation machinery: reversibility of condensation distinguishes contributions of condensin and cohesin. J. Cell Biol. 156: 805-815.
DOI
|
24 |
Lee MS, Yoon SW, Kim KP. 2015. Mitotic cohesin subunit Mcd1 regulates the progression of meiotic recombination in budding yeast. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (In Press)
|
25 |
Freeman L, Aragon-Alcaide L, Strunnikov A. 2000. The condensin complex governs chromosome condensation and mitotic transmission of rDNA. J. Cell Biol. 149: 811–824.
DOI
|
26 |
Garcia V, Phelps SE, Gray S, Neale MJ. 2011. Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479: 241-244.
DOI
|
27 |
Hong S, Sung Y, Yu M, Lee M, Kleckner N, Kim KP. 2013. The logic and mechanism of homologous recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell 51: 440-453.
DOI
|
28 |
Gasior SL, Wong AK, Kora Y, Shinohara A, Bishop DK. 1998. Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with Rad55 and Rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev. 12: 2208-2221.
DOI
|
29 |
Gartenberg MR, Merkenschlager M. 2008. Condensin goes with the family but not with the flow. Genome Biol. 9: 236.
DOI
|
30 |
Hagstrom KA, Meyer BJ. 2003. Condensin and cohesin: more than chromosome compactor and glue. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 520-534.
DOI
|
31 |
Hong S, Kim KP. 2013. Shu1 promotes homolog bias of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cells 36: 446-454.
DOI
|
32 |
Hunter N, Kleckner N. 2001. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59-70.
DOI
|
33 |
Cannavo E, Cejka P. 2014. Sae2 promotes dsDNA endonuclease activity within Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to resect DNA breaks. Nature 514: 122-125.
DOI
|
34 |
Cloud V, Chan YL, Grubb J, Budke B, Bishop DK. 2012. Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis. Science 337: 1222-1225.
DOI
|
35 |
Anderson DE, Losada A, Erickson HP, Hirano T. 2002. Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J. Cell Biol. 156: 419-424.
DOI
|
36 |
Allers T, Lichten M. 2001. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 13: 47-57.
DOI
|
37 |
Bzymek M, Thayer NH, Oh SD, Kleckner N, Hunter N. 2010. Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair. Nature 464: 937-941.
DOI
|
38 |
Brito IL, Yu HG, Amon A. 2010. Condensins promote coorientation of sister chromatids during meiosis I in budding yeast. Genetics 185: 55-64.
DOI
|
39 |
Bhalla N, Biggins S, Murray AW. 2002. Mutation of YCS4, a budding yeast condensin subunit, affects mitotic and nonmitotic chromosome behavior. Mol. Biol. Cell 13: 632-645.
DOI
|