Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1503.03090

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction for Microbial Growth Kinetics of Mixed Culture System  

Cotto, Ada (Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University)
Looper, Jessica K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University)
Mota, Linda C. (Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University)
Son, Ahjeong (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.25, no.11, 2015 , pp. 1928-1935 More about this Journal
Abstract
Microbial growth kinetics is often used to optimize environmental processes owing to its relation to the breakdown of substrate (contaminants). However, the quantification of bacterial populations in the environment is difficult owing to the challenges of monitoring a specific bacterial population within a diverse microbial community. Conventional methods are unable to detect and quantify the growth of individual strains separately in the mixed culture reactor. This work describes a novel quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based genomic approach to quantify each species in mixed culture and interpret its growth kinetics in the mixed system. Batch experiments were performed for both single and dual cultures of Pseudomonas putida and Escherichia coli K12 to obtain Monod kinetic parameters (μmax and Ks). The growth curves and kinetics obtained by conventional methods (i.e., dry weight measurement and absorbance reading) were compared with that obtained by qPCR assay. We anticipate that the adoption of this qPCR-based genomic assay can contribute significantly to traditional microbial kinetics, modeling practice, and the operation of bioreactors, where handling of complex mixed cultures is required.
Keywords
Microbial growth; Monod; quantitative PCR (qPCR); Pseudomonas putida; Escherichia coli K12;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dykhuizen D. 1978. Selection for tryptophan auxotrophs of Escherichia coli in glucose-limited chemostats as a test of the energy conservation hypothesis of evolution. Evolution 35: 125-150.   DOI
2 Baxter J, Cummings S. 2008. The degradation of the herbicide bromoxynil and its impact of bacterial diversity in a top soil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104: 1605-1616.   DOI
3 Bekins BA, Warren E, Godsy EM. 1998. A comparison of zero order, first order, and monod biotransforamtion models. Ground Water 36: 261-268.   DOI
4 Brown AM. 2001. A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 65: 191-200.   DOI
5 Egli T. 2010. How to live at very low substrate concentration. Water Res. 44: 4826-4837.   DOI
6 Fischer SE. 2010. Survival of native Pseudomonas in soil and wheat rhizosphere and antagonist activity against plant pathogenic fungi Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 97: 241-251.   DOI
7 Grady CPL, Daigger GT, Lim HC. 1999. Biological Wastewater Treatment, pp. 295-314. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
8 Lee C, Kim J, Gu Shin J, Hwang S. 2006. Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J. Biotechnol. 123: 273-280.   DOI
9 Keel C, Weller DM, Natsch A, Defago G, Cook RJ, Thomashow LS. 1996. Conservation of the 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis locus among fluorescent Pseudomonas strains from diverse geographic locations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 552-563.
10 Koutinas M, Kiparissides A, Lam M-C, Silva-Rocha R, Godinho M, de Loranzo V, et al. 2011. Improving the prediction of Pseudomonas putida mt-2 growth kinetics with the use of a gene expression regulation model of the TOL plasmid. Biochem. Eng. J. 55: 108-118.   DOI
11 Kovarova-Kovar K, Egli T. 1998. Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 646-666.
12 Lee C, Lee S, Shin SG. 2008. Real-time PCR determination of rRNA gene copy number: absolute and relative quantification assays with Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 78: 371-376.   DOI
13 Monod J. 1949. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 3: 371-394.   DOI
14 O’Sullivan DJ, O’Gara F. 1992. Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas ssp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 56: 662-676.
15 Oliveira CS, Ordaz A, Alba J, Alves MM, Ferreira EC, Thalasso FT. 2009. Determination of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters of Pseudomonas putida F1 by chemostat and in situ pulse respirometry. Chem. Product Process Model. 4: 1-14.
16 Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
17 Schwartz E, Trinh SV, Scow KM. 2000. Measuring growth of a phenanthrene-degrading bacterial inoculum in soil with quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction method. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34: 1-7.   DOI
18 USEPA. 1997. Escherichia coli K-12 derivatives final risk assessment. EPA. Available online.
19 Wang NS. 2011. Measurements of cell biomass concentration. Available from http://www.eng.umd.edu/-nsw/ench485/lab9c.htm
20 Wang KW, Baltiz BC, Lewandowski GA. 1996. Kinetics of phenol biodegradation in the presence of glucose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 51: 87-94.   DOI
21 Whelan JA, Russel NB, Whelan MA. 2003. A method for the absolute quantification of cDNA using real-time PCR. J. Immunol. Methods 278: 261-269.   DOI
22 Widmer F, Seidler RJ, Gillevet PM, Watrud LS, di Giovanni GD. 1998. A highly selective PCR protocol for detecting 16S rRNA genes of the genus Pseudomonas (sensu stricto) in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 2545-2553.
23 Wu X, Monchy S, Taghavi S, Zhu W, Ramos J, van der Leile D. 2011. Comparative genomics and functional analysis of niche-specific adaptation in Pseudomonas putida. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35: 299-323.   DOI
24 Zago A, Chugani S, Chakrabarty AM. 1999. Cloning and characterization of polyphosphate kinase and exopolyphosphate genes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8830. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 2065-2071.