Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1306.06067

Microbial Community Dynamics in Batch High-Solid Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste Under Mesophilic Conditions  

Yi, Jing (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Dong, Bin (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Xue, Yonggang (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Li, Ning (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Gao, Peng (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Zhao, Yuxin (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Dai, Lingling (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Dai, Xiaohu (National Engineering Research Center for Urban Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.24, no.2, 2014 , pp. 270-279 More about this Journal
Abstract
Microbial community shifts, associated with performance data, were investigated in an anaerobic batch digester treating high-solid food waste under mesophilic conditions using, a combination of molecular techniques and chemical analysis methods. The batch process was successfully operated with an organic removal efficiency of 44.5% associated with a biogas yield of 0.82 L/g $VS_{removal}$. Microbial community structures were examined by denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis. Clostridium and Symbiobacterium organisms were suggested to be mainly responsible for the organic matter catabolism in hydrolysis and acidogenesis reactions. The dynamics of archaeal and methanogenic populations were monitored using real-time PCR targeting 16S rRNA genes. Methanosarcina was the predominant methanogen, suggesting that the methanogenesis took place mainly via an aceticlastic pathway. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens were also supported in high-solid anaerobic digestion of food waste through syntrophism with syntrophic bacterium. Microbial community shifts showed good agreement with the performance parameters in anaerobic digestion, implying the possibility of diagnosing a high-solid anaerobic digestion process by monitoring microbial community shifts. On the other hand, the batch results could be relevant to the start-up period of a continuous system and could also provide useful information to set up a continuous operation.
Keywords
Anaerobic digestion; high-solid; food waste; microbial community;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 59: 143-169.
2 APHA (American Public Health Association). 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Ed. Washington, DC, USA.
3 Appels L, Baeyens J, Degreve J, Dewil R. 2008. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progr. Energ. Combust. Sci. 34: 755-781.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Batstone D, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi S, Pavlostathis S, Rozzi A, et al. 2002. Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1, IWA STR no. 13. IWA Publishing, London, UK.
5 Bolzonella D, Pavan P, Mace S, Cecchi F. 2006. Dry anaerobic digestion of differently sorted organic municipal solid waste: a full-scale experience. Water Sci. Technol. 53: 23-32.
6 Brunk C, Avaniss-Aghajani E, Brunk C. 1996. A computer analysis of primer and probe hydridization potential with bacterial small-subunit rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 872-879.
7 Bujoczek G, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, Cenkowski S. 2000. High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 76: 51-60.   DOI
8 Conklin A, Stensel HD, Ferguson J. 2006. Growth kinetics and competition between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Water Environ Res. 78: 486-496.   DOI
9 Dai X, Duan N, Dong B, Dai L. 2013. High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: stability and performance. Waste Manag. 33: 308-316.   DOI
10 Demirel B, Scherer P. 2008. The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 7: 173-190.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 DeLong EF. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 5685-5689.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ueda K, Yamashita A, Ishikawa J, Shimada M, Watsuji T-O, Morimura K, et al. 2004. Genome sequence of Symbiobacterium thermophilum, an uncultivable bacterium that depends on microbial commensalism. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 4937-4944.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Yu Y, Lee C, Kim J, Hwang S. 2005. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89: 670-679.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Rapport J, Zhang R, Jenkins B, Williams R. 2008. Current anaerobic digestion technologies used for treatment of municipal organic solid waste. University of California, Davis, Contractor Report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board.
15 Raskin L, Poulsen LK, Noguera DR. 1994. Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 1241-1248.
16 Rivière D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, Chaussonnerie S, Guermazi S, Weissenbach J, et al. 2009. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge. ISME J. 3: 700-714.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sasaki, Daisuke H, Tomoyuki H, Shin H, Yoshiyuki U, Masaharu I, Yasuo I. 2011. Methanogenic pathway and community structure in a thermophilic anaerobic digestion process of organic solid waste. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 111: 41-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Schnürer A, Schink B, Svensson BH. 1996. Clostridium ultunense sp. nov, a mesophilic bacterium oxidizing acetate in syntrophic association with a hydrogenotrophic methanogenic bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46: 1145-1152.   DOI
19 Shin SG, Lee S, Lee C, Hwang K, Hwang S. 2010. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 9461-9470.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sneath PH, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. 1986. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 2. Williams & Wilkins.
21 Supaphol S, Jenkins SN, PIntomo P, Waite IS, O'Donnell AG. 2011. Microbial community dynamics in mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of mixed waste. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 4021-4027.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Liu Y, Whitman WB. 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1125: 171-189.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Trzcinski AP, Ray MJ, Stuckey DC. 2010. Performance of a three-stage membrane bioprocess treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and evolution of its archaeal and bacterial ecology. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 1652-1661.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Li R, Chen S, Li X. 2010. Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with dairy manure in a twophase digestion system. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 160: 643-654.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Lin J, Zuo JN, Ji RF, Chen XJ, Liu FL, Wang KJ, Yang YF. 2012. Methanogenic community dynamics in anaerobic codigestion of fruit and vegetable waste and food waste. J. Environ. Sci. 24: 1288-1294.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Mata-Alvarez J, Llabres P, Cecchi F, Pavan P. 1992. Anaerobic digestion of the Barcelona central food market organic wastes: experimental study. Bioresour. Technol. 39: 39-48.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Mendez R, Lema JM, Soto M. 1995. Treatment of seafoodprocessing wastewaters in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters. Water Environ. Res. 67: 33-45.   DOI
28 Miles RJ. 1992. Catabolism in mollicutes. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138: 1773-1783.   DOI
29 Muyzer G, De Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 695-700.
30 Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves M. 2009. Co-digestion of cow manure, food waste and intermittent input of fat. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 1957-1962.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Oleszkiewicz JA, Poggi-Varaldo HM. 1997. High-solids anaerobic digestion of mixed municipal and industrial waste. J. Environ. Eng. 123: 1087-1092.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Guendouz J, Buffiere P, Cacho J, Carrere M, Delgenes J. 2008. High-solids anaerobic digestion: comparison of three pilot scales. Water Sci. Technol. 58: 1757-1763.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Dojka MA, Hugenholtz P, Haack SK, Pace NR. 1998. Microbial diversity in a hydrocarbon-and chlorinated-solvent-contaminated aquifer undergoing intrinsic bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 3869-3877.
34 Duan N, Dong B, Wu B, Dai X. 2012. High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions: feasibility study. Bioresour. Technol. 104: 150-156.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 García-Bernet D, Buffière P, Latrille E, Steyer JP, Escudié R. 2011. Water distribution in biowastes and digestates of dry anaerobic digestion technology. Chem. Eng. J. 172: 924-928.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Gurtner C, Heyrman J, Piñar G, Lubitz W, Swings J, Rölleke S. 2000. Comparative analyses of the bacterial diversity on two different biodeteriorated wall paintings by DGGE and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 46: 229-239.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Jenkins SN, Waite IS, Blackburn A, Husband R, Rushton SP, Manning DC, O'Donnell AG. 2009. Actinobacterial community dynamics in long term managed grasslands. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 95: 319-334.   DOI
38 Kim HW, Han SK, Shin HS. 2003. The optimisation of food waste addition as a co-substrate in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Waste Manag. Res. 21: 515-526.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Leclerc M, Delgenes JP, Godon JJ. 2004. Diversity of the archaeal community in 44 anaerobic digesters as determined by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and 16S rDNA sequencing. Environ. Microbiol. 6: 809-819.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Leven L, Eriksson AR, Schnürer A. 2007. Effect of process temperature on bacterial and archaeal communities in two methanogenic bioreactors treating organic household waste. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59: 683-693.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 McMahon KD, Stroot PG, Mackie RI, Raskin L. 2001. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--II: microbial population dynamics. Water Res. 35: 1817-1827.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Karakashev D, Batstone DJ, Angelidaki I. 2005. Influence of environmental conditions on methanogenic compositions in anaerobic biogas reactors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 331-338.   DOI   ScienceOn