Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1310.10117

Electricity Generation by Microbial Fuel Cell Using Microorganisms as Catalyst in Cathode  

Jang, Jae Kyung (Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California)
Kan, Jinjun (Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California)
Bretschger, Orianna (Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Southern California)
Gorby, Yuri A. (The J. Craig Venter Insitute)
Hsu, Lewis (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California)
Kim, Byung Hong (Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California)
Nealson, Kenneth H. (Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.23, no.12, 2013 , pp. 1765-1773 More about this Journal
Abstract
The cathode reaction is one of the most seriously limiting factors in a microbial fuel cell (MFC). The critical dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration of a platinum-loaded graphite electrode was reported as 2.2 mg/l, about 10-fold higher than an aerobic bacterium. A series of MFCs were run with the cathode compartment inoculated with activated sludge (biotic) or not (abiotic) on platinum-loaded or bare graphite electrodes. At the beginning of the operation, the current values from MFCs with a biocathode and abiotic cathode were $2.3{\pm}0.1$ and $2.6{\pm}0.2mA$, respectively, at the air-saturated water supply in the cathode. The current from MFCs with an abiotic cathode did not change, but that of MFCs with a biotic cathode increased to 3.0 mA after 8 weeks. The coulomb efficiency was 59.6% in the MFCs with a biotic cathode, much higher than the value of 15.6% of the abiotic cathode. When the DO supply was reduced, the current from MFCs with an abiotic cathode decreased more sharply than in those with a biotic cathode. When the respiratory inhibitor azide was added to the catholyte, the current decreased in MFCs with a biotic cathode but did not change in MFCs with an abiotic cathode. The power density was higher in MFCs with a biotic cathode ($430W/m^3$ cathode compartment) than the abiotic cathode MFC ($257W/m^3$ cathode compartment). Electron microscopic observation revealed nanowire structures in biofilms that developed on both the anode and on the biocathode. These results show that an electron-consuming bacterial consortium can be used as a cathode catalyst to improve the cathode reaction.
Keywords
Microbial fuel cell; biocathode; electricity generation; catalyst;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Reguera G, Nevin KP, Nicoll JS, Covalla SF, Woodard TL, Lovley DR. 2006. Biofilm and nanowire production leads to increased current in Geobacter sulfurreduceans fuel cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 7345-7348.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Rhoads A, Beyena H, Lewandowski Z. 2005. Microbial fuel cell using anaerobic respiration as an anodic reaction and biomineralized manganese as a cathodic reactant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39: 4666-4671.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
4 Schafer H, Muyzer G. 2001. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in marine microbial ecology. In Paul J (ed.). Methods in Microbiology. Academic Press, Inc., London.
5 Schmidt TM, Delong EF, Pace NR. 1991. Analysis of a marine picoplankton community by 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. J. Bacteriol. 173: 4371-4378.
6 Woznica W, Dzirba J, Manka D, Labuzek S. 2003. Effect of electron transport inhibitor on iron reduction in Aeromonas hydrophila strain KB1. Anaerobe 9: 125-130.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Zuo Y, Cheng S, Call D, Logan BE. 2007. Tubular membrane cathodes for scalable power generation in microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41: 3347-3353.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 He Z, Kan J, Wang Y, Huang Y, Mansfeld F, Nealson KH. 2009. Electricity production coupled to ammonium in a microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 3391-3397.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Jang JK, Chang IS, Moon H, Kang KH, Kim BH. 2006. Nitrilotriacetic acid degradation under microbial fuel cell environment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 95: 772-774.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Holmes DE, Bond DR, O'Neil RA, Reimers CE, Tender LR, Lovley DR. 2004. Microbial communities associated with electrodes harvesting electricity from a variety of aquatic sediments. Microbial Ecol. 48: 178-190.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Jang JK, Pham TH, Chang IS, Kang KH, Moon H, Cho KS, Kim BH. 2004. Construction and operation of a novel mediator- and membrane-less microbial fuel cell. Process Biochem. 39: 1007-1012.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules, In Munro HN (ed.). Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY.
13 Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schroder U, Keller J, Freguia S, et al. 2006. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 5181-5192.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lovley DR. 2006. Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nature 4: 497-508.
15 Lovley DR. 2006. Microbial fuel cells: novel microbial physiologies and engineering approaches. Sci. Biotechnol. 17: 327-332.
16 Ovreas L, Forney L, Daae FL, Torsvik V. 1997. Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet, as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 3367-3373.
17 Pham TH, Jang JK, Chang IS, Kim BH. 2004. Improvement of cathode reaction of a mediatorless microbial fuel cell. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 324-329.
18 Rabaey K, Verstraete W. 2005. Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol. 23: 291-298.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ravaey K, Lissens G, Siciliano SD, Verstraete W. 2003. A microbial fuel cell capable of converting glucose to electricity at high rate and efficiency. Biotechnol. Lett. 25: 1531-1535.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Angenent L, Karim K, Al-Dahhan MH, Wrenn BA, Domiguez-Espinosa R. 2004. Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. Trends Biotechnol. 22: 477-485.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Cheng S, Liu H, Logan B. 2006. Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 364-369.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Gorby YA, Yanina S, McLean JS, Rosso KM, Moyles D, Dohnalkova A, et al. 2005. Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis s train MR- 1 and other microorganisms. PNAS 103: 11358-11363.
23 Gil GC, Chang IS, Kim BH, Kim M, Jang JK, Park HS, Kim HJ. 2003. Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens. Bioelectron. 18: 327-324.   DOI   ScienceOn