Browse > Article

Screening of Lactobacilli Derived from Chicken Feces and Partial Characterization of Lactobacillus acidophilus A12 as Animal Probiotics  

Lee, Na-Kyoung (Division of Animal Life Science, Konkuk University)
Yun, Cheol-Won (School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University)
Kim, Seung-Wook (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University)
Chang, Hyo-Ihl (School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University)
Kang, Chang-Won (Division of Animal Life Science, Konkuk University)
Paik, Hyun-Dong (Division of Animal Life Science, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.18, no.2, 2008 , pp. 338-342 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was performed to screen and select Lactobacillus strains from chicken feces for probiotic use in animals. Of these strains, strain AU had the highest immunostimulatory effect. Therefore, strain A12 was characterized as a potential probiotic. Strain A12 was tentatively identified as Lactobacillus acidophilus A12, using the API 50 CHL kit based on a 99.9% homology. L. acidophilus A12 was highly resistant to artificial gastric juice (pH 2.5) and bile acid (oxgall). Based on results from the API ZYM kit, leucine arylamidase, crystine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, ${\alpha}$-galactosidase, ${\beta}$-galactosidase, ${\alpha}$-glucosidase, ${\beta}$-glucosidase, and N-acetyl-${\beta}$-glucosamidase were produced by strain A12. L. acidophilus A12 showed resistance to several antibiotics (nisin, gentamicin, and erythromycin). The amount of interleukin $(IL)-1{\alpha}$ in $20{\times}$ concentrated supernatant from L. acidophilus A12 was approximately 156pg/ml. With regard to antioxidant activity, L. acidophilus A12 supernatant showed 60.6% DPPH radical scavenging activity. These results demonstrate the potential use of L. acidophilus A12 as health-promoting probiotics.
Keywords
Lactobacillus acidophilus; chicken feces; animal probiotics; interleukin-$1{\alpha}$;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 7  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Amanatidou, A., E. J. Smid, M. H. J. Bennik, and L. G. M. Gorris. 2001. Antioxidative properties of Lactobacillus sake upon exposure to elevated oxygen concentration. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 203: 87-94   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Benno, Y. and T. Mitsuoka. 1992. Impact of Bifidobacterium longum on human fecal microflora. Microbiol. Immunol. 36: 683-694   DOI
3 Chung, Y. C., C. T. Chang, W. W. Chao, C. F. Lin, and S. T. Chou. 2002. Antioxidative activity and safety of the 50% ethanolic extract from red bean fermented by Bacillus subtilis IMR-NK1. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 2454-2458   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Cole, C. B., R. Fuller, and S. M. Carter. 1989. Effect of probiotic supplements of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium adolescentis 2204 on $\beta-glucosidase$ and $\beta-glucuronidase$ activity in the lower gut of rats associated with a human fecal flora. Microb. Ecol. Health D. 2: 223-225   DOI
5 Ha, C.-G., J.-K. Cho, C.-H. Lee, Y.-G. Chai, Y.-A. Ha, and S.-H. Shin. 2006. Cholesterol lowering effects of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from human feces. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16: 1201-1209   과학기술학회마을
6 Kos, B., J. OEuoekoviæ, J. Goreta, and S. Matooeiæ. 2000. Effect of protectors on the viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus M92 in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 38: 121-128
7 Park, Y. H., J. G. Kim, Y. W. Shin, and S. H. Kim. 2007. Effects of dietary inclusion of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 on cholesterol metabolism in rats. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17: 655-662   과학기술학회마을
8 Pascual, M., M. Hugas, J. I. Badiola, J. M. Monfort, and M. Garriga. 1999. Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 4981-4986
9 Temmerman, R., B. Pot, G. Huys, and J. Swings. 2003. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 81: 1-10   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tsaliki, E., V. Lagouri, and G. Doxastakis. 1999. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of lupin seed flour and derivatives (Lupins albus ssp. Graecus). Food Chem. 65: 71-75   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Valraedas, M. M. C., H. C. van der Mei, G. Reid, and J. H. Busscher. 1996. Inhibition of initial adhesion of uropathogenic Enterococcus faecalis by biosurfactants from Lactobacillus isolated. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 1958-1963
12 Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in human and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66: 365-378   DOI
13 Abe, F., N. Ishibashi, and S. Shimamura. 1995. Effect of administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 2838-2846   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Klaenhammer, T. R. 1988. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Biochimie 70: 337-349   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Zhou, J. S., C. J. Pillidge, P. K. Gopal, and H. S. Gill. 2005. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 8: 211-217
16 Kobayashi, Y., K. Tohyama, and T. Terashima. 1974. Tolerance of the multiple antibiotic resistant strains, L. casei PSR 3002, to artificial digestive fluids. Jpn. J. Microbiol. 29: 691-697
17 Xanthopoulos, V., E. Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, and N. Tzanetakis. 2000. Characterization of Lactobacillus strains from infant faeces as dietary adjuncts. Food Microbiol. 17: 205-215   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hutkins, R. W. and N. L. Nannen. 1993. pH homeostasis in lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 76: 2354-2365   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Shon, M. Y., S. D. Choi, G. G. Kahng, S. H. Nam, and N. J. Sung. 2004. Antimutagenic, antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of ethyl acetate extracts from white, yellow and red onions. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42: 659-666   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Caglar, E., B. Kargul, and I. Tanboga. 2005. Bacteriotherapy and probiotic's role on oral health. Oral Dis. 11: 131-137   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kim, T.-H., N.-K. Lee, K.-H. Chang, E. Park, S.-Y. Choi, and H.-D. Paik. 2006. Antioxidant activity of partially purified extracts isolated from Bacillus polyfermenticus SCD culture. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 15: 482-484   과학기술학회마을
22 Fernandez, M. F., S. Boris, and C. Barbes. 2005. Safety evaluation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis UO 004, a probiotic bacterium. Res. Microbiol. 156: 154-160   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Shin, M.-S., Y.-J. Kim, H.-S. Bae, and Y.-J. Baek. 1996. Effects of the lactic acid bacteria administration on fecal microflora and putrefactive metabolites in healthy adults. Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 254-260
24 Kong, W. S., S. H. Kim, J. S. Park, S. J. Hahn, and I. M. Chung. 2004. Evaluation and selection of antioxidative activities of 80 collected and mated mushroom strains. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 689-693
25 Shin, M.-S., H.-M. Kim, G.-T. Kim, C.-S. Huh, H.-S. Bae, and Y.-J. Baek. 1999. Selection and characteristics of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain from Korean feces. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 31: 495-501
26 Lee, H. M. and Y. Lee. 2006. Isolation of Lactobacillus plantarum from kimchi and its inhibitory activity on the adherence and growth of Helicobacter pylori. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16: 1513-1517   과학기술학회마을
27 Do, J. R., S. N. Kang, K. J. Kim, and S. W. Lee. 2004. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities and phenolic contents in the water extract of medicinal plants. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 640-645
28 Lee, J. K., W. T. Kim, J. H. Lee, J. H. Yum, and W. C. Shin. 1991. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria for preparation of probiotics. Kor. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 429-432
29 Sullivan, $\AA$. and C. E. Nord. 2005. Probiotics and gastrointestinal disease. J. Intern. Med. 257: 78-92   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Isolauri, E., T. Arvola, Y. Sutas, E. Moilanen, and S. Salminen. 2000. Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. Clin. Exp. Allergy 30: 1604-1610
31 Vinderola, C. G. and J. A. Reinheimer. 2003. Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: A comparative 'in vitro' study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance. Food Res. Int. 36: 895-904   DOI   ScienceOn
32 O'Sullivan, G. C. 2001. Probiotics. Br. J. Surg. 88: 161-162   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Clancy, R. 2003. Immunobiotics and the probiotic evolution. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 38: 9-12   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Park, J.-H., Y. Lee, E. Moon, S.-H. Seok, M.-W. Baek, H.-Y. Lee, D.-J. Kim, C.-H. Kim, and J.-H. Park. 2005. Safety assessment of Lactobacillus fermentum PL9005, a potential probiotic lactic acid bacterium, in mice. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15: 603-608   과학기술학회마을
35 Kullisaar, T., M. Zilmer, M. Mikelsaar, T. Vihalemm, H. Annuk, C. Kairane, and A. Kilk. 2002. Two antioxidative lactobacilli strains as promising probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 72: 215-224   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Kim, J. A., J. M. Lee, D. B. Shin, and N. H. Lee. 2004. The antioxidant activity and tyrosinate inhibitory activity of phloro-tannins in Ecklonia cava. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 13: 476-480
37 Fernandez, M. F., S. Boris, and C. Barbes. 2003. Probiotic properties of human Lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94: 449-455   DOI   ScienceOn