Browse > Article

Effect of Distribution System Materials and Water Quality on Heterotrophic Plate Counts and Biofilm Proliferation  

CHANG , YOUNG-CHEOL (Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., University of Central Florida)
JUNG, KWEON (Division of Waste, Seoul Metropolitan Government Institute of Health and Environment)
Publication Information
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology / v.14, no.6, 2004 , pp. 1114-1119 More about this Journal
Abstract
The biofilms on pipe walls in water distribution systems are of interest since they can lead to chlorine demand, coliform growth, pipe corrosion, and water taste and odor problems. As such, the study described in this paper is part of an AWWARF and Tampa Bay Water tailored collaboration project to determine the effect of blending different source waters on the water quality in various distribution systems. The project was based on 18 independent pilot distribution systems (PDS), each being fed by a different water blend (7 finished waters blended in different proportions). The source waters compared were groundwater, surface water, and brackish water, which were treated in a variety of pilot distribution systems, including reverse osmosis (RO) (desalination), both membrane and chemical softening, and ozonation-biological activated carbon (BAC), resulting in a total of 7 different finished waters. The observations from this study consistently demonstrated that unlined ductile iron was more heavily colonized by a biomass than galvanized steel, lined ductile iron, and PVC (in that order) and that the fixed biomass accumulation was more influenced by the nature of the supporting material than by the water quality (including the secondary residual levels). However, although the bulk liquid water cultivable bacterial counts (i.e. heterotrophic plate counts or HPCs) did not increase with a greater biofilm accumulation, the results also suggested that high HPCs corresponded to a low disinfectant residual more than a high biofilm inventory. Furthermore, temperature was found to affect the biofilms, plus the AOC was important when the residual was between 0.6 and 2.0 mg $Cl_2/l$. An additional aspect of the current study was that the potential of the exoproteolytic activity (PEPA) technique was used along with a traditional so-called destructive technique in which the biofilm was scrapped off the coupon surface, resuspended, and cultivated on an R2A agar. Both techniques indicated similar trends and relative comparisons among the PDSs, yet the culturable biofilm values for the traditional method were several orders of magnitude lower than the PEPA values.
Keywords
Pipe material; biofilm biomass quantification; drinking water; PEPA;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 7  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rittman, B. E. and P. M. Huck. 1989. Biological treatment of public water supplies. CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 19(2): 119
2 Goshko, M. A., H. A. Minnigh, W. O. Pipes, and R. R. Christian. 1983. Relationships between standard plate counts and other parameters in water distribution systems. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 75: 568-571
3 Oh, B. K., Y. K. Kim, Y. M. Bae, W. H. Lee, and J. W. Choi. 2003. Detection of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 using immunosensor based on surface plasmon resonance. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 12: 780-786
4 LeChevallier, M. W., C. D. Lowry, and R. G. Lee. 1990. Disinfecting biofilms in a model distribution system. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 82(7): 87
5 Somville, M. and G. Billén. 1983. A method for determining exoproteolytic activity in natural waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 190-193
6 de Beer, D., R. Srinivasan, and P. S. Stewart. 1994. Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 4339-4344
7 American Public Health Association. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Ed. Washington, DC, U.S.A
8 Holden, B., M. Greetham, B. T. Croll, and J. Scutt. 1995. The effect of changing inter-process and final disinfection reagents on corrosion and biofilm growth in distribution pipes. Water Sci. Technol. 32: 213-220
9 Laurent, P. and P. Servais. 1995. Fixed bacterial biomass estimated by potential exoproteolytic activity. Can. J. Microbiol. 41(8): 749-752
10 Kim, M. D., W. J. Lee, K. W. Park, K. H. Rhee, and J. H. Seo. 2003. Two-step fed-batch culture of recombinant Escherichia coli for production of Bacillus licheniformis maltogenic amylase. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 12: 273-278
11 Niquette, P., P. Servais, and R. Savoir. 2000. Impacts of pipe materials on densities of fixed bacterial biomass in a drinking water distribution system. Wat. Res. 34(6): 1952- 1956
12 Costerton, J. W., K. J. Cheng, G. G. Geesey, T. I. Ladd, J. C. Nickel, M. Dasgupta, and T. J. Marrie. 1987. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 41: 435-464
13 Quignon, F., M. Sardin, L. Kiene, and L. Schwartzbrod. 1997. Poliovirus-1 inactivation and interaction with biofilm: A pilot-scale study. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 978- 982
14 Brown, M. R. W. and P. Gilbert. 1993. Sensivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents. J. Applied Bact. 74: 87S-97S
15 Van der Kooij, D. 1992. Assimiliable organic carbon as an indicator of bacterial regrowth. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 84: 57-65
16 LeChevallier, M. W., C. D. Lowry, R. G. Lee, and D. L. Gibbon. 1993. Examining the relationship between iron corrosion and the disinfection of biofilm bacteria. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 85(7): 111
17 Stewart, P. S. and J. B. Raquepas. 1995. Implications of reaction-diffusion theory for the disinfection of microbial biofilms by reactive antimicrobial agents. Chemical Engineering Science 50: 3099-3104
18 Hahm, D. H., M. J. Yeom, W. M. Ko, E. H. Lee, H. J. Lee, I. S. Shim, and H. Y. Kim. 2003. Characterization of the nickel resistance gene from Legionella pneumophila: Attention of nickel resistance by ppk (polyphosphate kinase) distribution in Escherichia coli. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 12: 114-120
19 Chen, X. and P. S. Stewart. 1996. Chlorine penetration into artificial biofilm is limited by a reaction-diffusion interaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30: 2078-2083