Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2022.07.007

Five Forces Model of Computational Power: A Comprehensive Measure Method  

Wu, Meixi (Institute of Cloud Computing and Big Data, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology)
Guo, Liang (Institute of Cloud Computing and Big Data, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology)
Yang, Xiaotong (Institute of Cloud Computing and Big Data, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology)
Xie, Lina (Institute of Cloud Computing and Big Data, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology)
Wang, Shaopeng (Institute of Cloud Computing and Big Data, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology)
Publication Information
KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS) / v.16, no.7, 2022 , pp. 2239-2256 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, a model is proposed to comprehensively evaluate the computational power. The five forces model of computational power solves the problem that the measurement units of different indexes are not unified in the process of computational power evaluation. It combines the bidirectional projection method with TOPSIS method. This model is more scientific and effective in evaluating the comprehensive situation of computational power. Lastly, an example shows the validity and practicability of the model.
Keywords
Computational power; Computational efficiency; Computational infrastructure; Data center; TOPSIS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Serafim Opricovic, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445-455, 2004.   DOI
2 Haywood, Sherbeck, Phelan, et al., "Investigating a relationship among CPU and system temperatures, thermal power, and CPU tasking levels," in Proc. of 13th InterSociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, IEEE, pp. 821-827, October, 2012.
3 John Nickolls, William J Dally, "The gpu computing era," IEEE micro, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 56-69, 2010.   DOI
4 Ignatov A, Timofte R, Denna M, et al., "Real-Time Quantized Image Super-Resolution on Mobile NPUs, Mobile AI 2021 Challenge: Report," in Proc. of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 2525-2534, December 18-20, 2021.
5 Aiping Y., "A novel model for dynamic multi-attributes group decision-making based on vague set and its TOPSIS solution," in Proc. of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, IEEE, Beijing, pp. 5539-5543, July 28, 2010.
6 J. Q. Zhang, Order method and equilibrium analysis, Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2003.
7 X. Z. Zhang, C. X. Zhu, "Generalized hierarchical preference ordering method for multi-attribute decision making," Systems engineering theory and practice, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2853-2858, 2013.
8 Z. Xin, J. Fang, P. Liu, "A grey relational projection method for multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number," Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3467-3477, 2013.   DOI
9 China. Ministry of industry and information Technology of the People's Republic of China. Three-year Action Plan for New Data Center Development (2021-2023), No. 76, Beijing-Ministry of industry and information Technology of the People's Republic of China, 2021.
10 F. H. Mcmahon, "The Livermore Fortran Kernels: A computer test of the numerical performance range," Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, USA, Tech. Rep. UCRL-53745, 1986.
11 Shih H. S. Shyur H. J. Lee E S., "An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making," Mathematical & Computer Modelling, vol. 45, no. 7-8, pp. 801-813, 2007.   DOI
12 L. Guo, M. X. Wu, et al., "Data center computational power whitepaper," Open Data Center Committee, Beijing, China, No. ODCC-2020-01008, 2021.
13 C. T. Chen, "Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment - ScienceDirect," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2000.   DOI
14 L. Guo, M. X. Wu, F. Wang, M. Gong, "Data center computational power assessment: Status and opportunities," ICT and policy, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 79-86, 2021.
15 G. H. Wang, et al., Decision theory and method, Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2014.
16 G. Jun, H. U. Tao, Y. U. Ting, et al., "A multi-attribute group decision-making approach based on uncertain linguistic information," in Proc. of 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Nanchang, pp. 4125-4128, June 3-5, 2019.
17 W. G. Fang, Z. Hong, "A multi-attribute group decision-making method approaching to group ideal solution," IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, Nanjing, pp. 815-819, November 18-20, 2007.
18 Y. Sun, et al., "Summarizing CPU and GPU Design Trends with Product Data," arXiv preprint arXiv: 1911.11313, 2019.
19 C. Rao, W. Chen, W. Cheng, "Research and Application of Fuzzy Grey Multi-attribute Group Decision Making," in Proc. of 2008 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, IEEE, Kunming, pp. 2292-2295, July 6-18, 2008.
20 J. Ye, "Bidirectional projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with neutrosophic numbers," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1021-1029, 2017.   DOI