[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2022.10.005

A Study on 5G Service Methods by using BOCR Model and ANP

Song, Inkuk (Management Department, Dankook University)

Publication Information

KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS) / v.16, no.10, 2022 , pp. 3299-3312 More about this Journal

Abstract

Recently, South Korea preferentially allocated frequencies to build 5G networks as a core competitiveness of the 4th Industrial Revolution. Although the government recognize the importance of 5G construction and preoccupation, network operators have limited to some services, testing the possibility of practical use of 5G. They hesitated to actively build and to carry out the service of a complete 5G network. While 5G is being developed and standardized like this, no one is sure of this step exactly what 5G will be. Thus, following research questions are asked by various stakeholders of 5G market: What is an ideal service providing method for the practical use of 5th generation mobile network? And what are the critical elements to be considered when selecting the service providing method? Therefore, the study aims to investigate 5G service providing issues and elements to be considered and to provide most appropriate service providing method for the practical use of 5G. The results identify that 'Specialized Service' is most appropriate method at the aspects of benefit and opportunity as well as the aspect of risk. In addition, the outcomes imply that the experts replying to the survey not only expect the expansion of emerging market, but also concern the social risk and cost. Since the study dealt with economic, social and business issues in providing 5G service, it might contribute not only to practical research, but also to academic research regarding 5G service method.

Keywords

5G Service; Specialized Service; Paid Prioritization; Simplified Service; Traffic Management;

Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By KSCI : 3 (Citation Analysis)

Reference
Cited By KSCI

1	I. Song, "Proposal of Research Issues related to the Technology, Service, Policy and Business Model in Commercializing and Promoting 5G Network," Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 20(3), 129-135, 2019. DOI
2	ITU, Recommendation ITU-R M.2083-0(09/2015), IMT Vision - Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond, 2015.
3	D. Cho and I. Song, "A Study on the Strategy of Platform Operator for Free Mobile Data: from the Perspectives of Business Opportunity and Risk," Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 18(5), 123-131, 2017. DOI
4	J. Hart, "The net neutrality debate in the United States," Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(4), 418-443, 2011. DOI
5	A. Carrillo, "Having Your Cake and Eating it Too? Zero-Rating, Net Neutrality and International Law," 19 Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 364, 2016.
6	D. Brake, "Mobile Zero Rating: The Economics and Innovation Behind Free Data," Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, 2016.
7	J. Kwak, "A study on the evolution of post-smartphone technologies in the 5G technology environment," KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1757-1772, 2020. DOI
8	SatelliteInternet Homepage. [Online]. Available: http://sateliteinternet.com
9	D. Cho and S. Park, "A Study on Comparison among Network Slicing, Specialized services & Paid Prioritization services in 5G era," Korean Journal of Broadcasting & Telecommunications Research, 103-134, 2018.
10	A. Renda, Antitrust, regulation and the neutrality trap: A plea for a smart, evidence-based internet policy, Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS), 2015.
11	Z. Frias, M. Perez and J. Martinez, "5G networks: Will technology and policy collide?," Telecommunications Policy, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 612-621, 2018. DOI
12	D. Cho and I. Song, "A Study on the Validity of Net Neutrality Regulation in Respect of ZeroRating," Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 18(5), 133-141, 2017. DOI
13	R. Frieden, "Grey nuances in the black and white debate over subsidized internet access," Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1017-1026, 2017. DOI
14	BEREC, BEREC guidelines on the implementation by national regulators of European net neutrality rules, 2016.
15	L. Roslyn and S. Elaluf-Calderwood, "Zero rating: do hard rules protect or harm consumers and competition? evidence from Chile, Netherlands and Slovenia," 37, 2015.
16	B. Schewick, "Network Neutrality and Zero-rating," Attachment to Barbara van Schewick's Ex Parte in the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet submitted February, 19, 14-28, 2015.
17	H. Zhang, N. Liu, X. Chu, K. Long, H. Aghvami, & C. Leung, "Network slicing based 5G and future mobile networks: mobility, resource management, and challenges," IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(8), 138-145, 2017. DOI
18	K. Park, J. Shin and B. Lee, "Analysis of Authentication Methods for Smartphone Banking Service using ANP," KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 8(6), pp. 2087-2103, 2014. DOI
19	T. Saaty, The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pennsylvania, 1996.
20	I. Millet and W. Wedley, "Modelling risk and uncertainty with the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11, 97-107, 2002. DOI
21	T. Taleb, A. Ksentini, & R. Jantti, "Anything as a service for 5G mobile systems," IEEE Network, 30(6), 84-91, 2016. DOI
22	T. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, 2nd Edition, RWS Publications, Pennsylvania, 2001.
23	S. Robert, "Where Internet Service Providers and Telephone Companies Compete: A Guide to the Computer Inquiries, Enhanced Service Providers and Information Service Providers," Commlaw Conspectus, vol.9, pp.49-69, 2001.