Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2020.12.007

Exploring Working Group's Psychological Subjectivity on Public Smart Work Services in a Cloud-based Social Networking  

Kim, Ki Youn (Department of Marketing Big Data, Mokwon University)
Song, In Kuk (Business Administration, Dankook University)
Publication Information
KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS) / v.14, no.12, 2020 , pp. 4748-4762 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the COVID 19 pandemic has affected on our daily lives and society in many ways. Specifically, it has brought rapid changes in the working environment from office working to smart telecommuting. In addition, cloud computing technology and services not only provided ubiquitous access, but also led to a sharing of information, internal-external communication channels, telework, and innovative smart work for the business process. As a result, smart work services based on social cloud networking have spread to the public sector. However, existing academic research examining smart work merely remains to focus on the theoretical conceptualization or to deal with merely several examples of private views. Best practices of smart work services based on cloud computing technology in the public field rarely exists. Moreover, many studies have been differently measured the values of smart work for private and public sectors depending on organizational singularities. Therefore, the study aims to define new theoretical implications and to explore future business strategies and policy directions based on a technical working group's personal psychological subjectivity. The research applied Q methodology, and selected five public organizations in Korea, that they have adopted or currently plan to adopt some part of smart work services.
Keywords
Smart Work; Cloud-Based Social Networking; Psychological Subjectivity; Q methodology; Case Study; Working Group; Interpretative Research; Strategic Policy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 IEEE MCSMS, "Mobile Cloud Computing systems, Management, and Security," in Proc. of the 6th International Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing systems Management, and Security, 2020.
2 J. S. Kim, I. S. Suh, and C. W. Ro, "Technological trends and cases of mobile cloud services," Review of the Korea Contents Association, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36-42, 2011.
3 S. J. Eom, N. B. Choi, and W. J. Sung, "The use of smart work in government: empirical analysis of Korean experiences," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 3, July 2016, pp. 562-571, 2016.   DOI
4 I. K. Song, "Subjectivity study on cloud-based smart work service of a quasi-government agency," Journal of Internet Computing and Services, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 113-123, 2014.   DOI
5 Hyosung Group, Work Smart, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://blog.hyosung.com
6 K. H. Park and Y. J. Kim, "Difference in acceptance level of smart work among tendencies of personal leadership styles," The Journal of Digital Policy and Management, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 197-207, 2013.
7 D. W. Won, Prepare new smart work age, The Korea Transport Institute, KOTI Magazine on Transport, 2012.
8 S. Marston, Z. Li, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Zhang, and A. Ghalsasi, "Cloud computing: The business perspective," Decision Support Systems, vol. 51,no. 1, pp. 176-189, 2011.   DOI
9 K. Y. Kim and Y. I. Yoon. "Comparative positioning of Korean network companies moving to converging cloud services," Advanced Science and Technology Letters, vol. 8, pp. 681-686, 2012.
10 D. Valle-Cruz, "Public value of e-government services through emerging technologies," International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 530-545. 2019.   DOI
11 S. C. Park and S. Y. Ryoo, "An empirical investigation of end-users' switching toward cloud computing: A two factor theory perspective," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 160-170, 2013.   DOI
12 W. Stephenson, The Study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology, Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
13 Schlinger, "Ques on Q-technique," Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 9, pp. 53-60, 1969.
14 B. McKeown and D. Thomas D, Q-methodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988.
15 S. R. Brown, Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science, London: Yale University Press, 1980.
16 S. R. Brown, "A primer on Q methodology," Operant Subjectivity, vol. 16, no. 3/4, pp. 91-138, 1993.
17 H. G. Kim, Q methodology: Philosophy, theories, analysis, and application, Seoul: Communication Books Inc., 2008.
18 K. Y. Kim and H. G. Kim, "A study on consumer preference typologing toward sharing economy service models based on collaborative consumption: A strategic approach to marketing communications," Journal of Koerean Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, vol. 27, pp. 23-40, Dec. 2013.
19 R. D. Wimmer and J. R. Dominick, Mass media research: An introduction. Boston, MA, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 1994.
20 B. Berelson and M. Janowitz, The evaluation of public opinion. Reader in Public Opinion and Communication, NY, USA: Free Press, 1966.
21 K. Y. Kim and B. G. Lee, "Marketing insights for mobile advertising and consumer segmentation in the cloud era: A Q-R hybrid methodology and practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 91, pp. 78-92, 2015.   DOI
22 H. G. Kim, "P samples and Q sorting," Journal of Korean Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, vol. 15, pp. 5-19, 2007.
23 J. V. Exel and G. D. Graaf, "Q methodology: A sneak preview," pp. 1-25, 2005.