Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2015.04.004

Performance Modelling of Adaptive VANET with Enhanced Priority Scheme  

Lim, Joanne Mun-Yee (Faculty of Engineering, Multimedia University)
Chang, YoongChoon (Faculty of Engineering, Multimedia University)
Alias, MohamadYusoff (Faculty of Engineering, Multimedia University)
Loo, Jonathan (School of Engineering and Information Sciences, Middlesex University)
Publication Information
KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS) / v.9, no.4, 2015 , pp. 1337-1358 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, we present an analytical and simulated study on the performance of adaptive vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) priority based on Transmission Distance Reliability Range (TDRR) and data type. VANET topology changes rapidly due to its inherent nature of high mobility nodes and unpredictable environments. Therefore, nodes in VANET must be able to adapt to the ever changing environment and optimize parameters to enhance performance. However, there is a lack of adaptability in the current VANET scheme. Existing VANET IEEE802.11p's Enhanced Distributed Channel Access; EDCA assigns priority solely based on data type. In this paper, we propose a new priority scheme which utilizes Markov model to perform TDRR prediction and assign priorities based on the proposed Markov TDRR Prediction with Enhanced Priority VANET Scheme (MarPVS). Subsequently, we performed an analytical study on MarPVS performance modeling. In particular, considering five different priority levels defined in MarPVS, we derived the probability of successful transmission, the number of low priority messages in back off process and concurrent low priority transmission. Finally, the results are used to derive the average transmission delay for data types defined in MarPVS. Numerical results are provided along with simulation results which confirm the accuracy of the proposed analysis. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed MarPVS results in lower transmission latency and higher packet success rate in comparison with the default IEEE802.11p scheme and greedy scheduler scheme.
Keywords
VANET; Priority; Transmission Distance Reliability Range; Contention Window; Markov Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. Sahoo, E. H. K. Wu, P. K. Sahu, and M. Gerla, “Binary-Partition-Assisted MAC-Layer Broadcast for Emergency Message Dissemination in VANETs,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.757-770, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
2 Esmaeiliteamour, M. Fathy and H. Ghaffarian, “A Priority based Scheduling Algorithm to Improve Quality of Service from Safety perspective in VANET,” Journal of Computing, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2151-9617, 2012. Article (CrossRef Link)
3 S. Yang, H. H. Refai and X. Ma, “CSMA based Inter Vehicle Communication using Distributed and Polling Coordination,” Proc. 8th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 13-15, pp. 167-171, 2005. Article (CrossRef Link)
4 B. X. Wang, K. Yin, and Y. Zhang, “An Exact Markov Process for Multihop Connectivity via Intervehicle Communication on Parallel Roads,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 865-868, 2012. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
5 Althoff. M and Mergel. A, “Comparison of Markov Chain Abstraction and Monte Carlo Simulation for the Safety Assessment of Autonomous Cars,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation System, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1237-1247, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
6 M. Khabazian, S. Aissa and M. Mehmet-Ali, “Performance Modelling of Safety Messages Broadcast in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks,” IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 380-387, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
7 S. Al-Sultan, M. M. Al-Doori, A. H. Al-Bayatti, HussienZedan, “A Comprehensive Survey on Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 37, pp. 380-392, 2014. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
8 D. B. Fambro+K. Fitzpatrick and R. J. Koppa, “Determination of Stopping Sight Transmission distance reliability ranges,” Transportation Research Board, no. 400, pp. 55, 1997. Article (CrossRef Link)
9 R. Cummins, Driving Standards Agency, Driving: The Essential Skills, 5th edition, Crown copyright, 2005. Article (CrossRef Link)
10 R. K. Schmidt, T. Köllmer, T. Leinmüller, B. Böddeker, G. Schäfer “Degradation of Transmission Range in VANETs caused by Interference,” Third International Conference on Communication Technologies for vehicles, pp.176-188, 2011. https://www.tu-ilmenau.de/fileadmin/media/telematik/schmidt/090501_hidterm.pdf
11 G. Habib, C. Bassil, “Influence of the RTS/CTS in VANET,” Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS) , pp. 1-4, 2013. Article (CrossRef Link)
12 IEEE Draft Standard for Information Technology Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments, vol. 11, pp. 802, 2012. Article (CrossRef Link)
13 L. Zhou, Y. Zhang, K. Song, W. Jing, Athanasios V. Vasilakos,“Distributed Media-Service Scheme for P2P-based Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 692-703, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
14 C. Z. Guo, Mita S. and McAllester D., “Robust Road Detection and Tracking in Challenging Scenarios based on Markov Random Fields with Unsupervised Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1338-1354, 2012. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
15 J. Karedal, N. Czink, A. Paier, F. Tufvesson and A. F. Molisch, “Path Loss Modelling for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 323-328, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
16 K. A. Hafeez, L. Zhao, B. Ma and J. W. Mark, “Performance Analysis and Enhancement of the DSRC for VANET’s Safety Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 3067-3083, 2013. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
17 Abdrabou, A., Liang, B. and W. Zhuang, “Delay Analysis for Sparse Vehicular Sensor Networks with Reliability Considerations,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4401-4413, 2013. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
18 AlenkaZajić, Mobile-to-Mobile Wireless Channels, 1st Edition, Artech House Mobile Communication Library, 2013.
19 J. M. Y. Lim, Y. C. Chang, M. Y. Alias, J. Loo, “Cognitive VANET with Enhanced Priority Scheme,” International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU2014), 2014. http://shdl.mmu.edu.my/5831/
20 C. Sommer, R. German and F. Dressler, “Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 10, no. 1, pp.3-1, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI
21 D. T. Tuan, S. Sakata and N. Komuro, “Priority and Admission Control for Assuring Quality of I2V Emergency Services in VANETs Integrated with Wireless LAN Mesh Networks,” Proc. 4th International Conference on Communications and Electronics, vol. 1-3, pp. 91-96, 2012. Article (CrossRef Link)
22 M. Khabazian, S. Aissa and M. Mehmet-Ali, “Performance Modelling of Message Dissemination in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks with Priority,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)   DOI