Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2021.01.004

Time domain broadband noise predictions for non-cavitating marine propellers with wall pressure spectrum models  

Choi, Woen-Sug (Center for Naval Ship Engineering, Seoul National University)
Hong, Suk-Yoon (Center for Naval Ship Engineering, Seoul National University)
Song, Jee-Hun (Center for Naval Ship Engineering, Seoul National University)
Kwon, Hyun-Wung (Center for Naval Ship Engineering, Seoul National University)
Park, Il-Ryong (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Dong-Eui University)
Seol, Han-Shin (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology)
Kim, Min-Jae (The 6th R&D Institute-3rd Directorate, Agency for Defense Development)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.13, no.1, 2021 , pp. 75-85 More about this Journal
Abstract
The broadband noise can be dominant or important for total characteristics for marine propeller noise representing the minimum base of self-noise. Accurate prediction of such noise is crucial for survivability of underwater military vessels. While the FW-H Formulation 1B can be used to predict broadband trailing edge noise, the method required experiment measurements of surface pressure correlations, showing its limitations in generality. Therefore, in this study, the methods are developed to utilize wall pressure spectrum models to overcome those limitations. Chase model is adopted to represent surface pressure along with the developed formulations to reproduce pressure statistics. Newly developed method is validated with the experiments of airfoils at different velocities. Thereafter, with its feasibility and generality, the procedure incorporating computational fluid dynamics is established and performed for a propeller behind submarine hull. The results are compared with the experiments conducted at Large Cavitation Tunnel, thus showing its usability and robustness.
Keywords
Marine propeller; Submarine; Flow noise; Non-cavitation noise; Wall pressure spectrum;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Groves, N.C., Huang, T.T., Chang, M.S., 1989. Geometric Characteristics of DARPA Suboff Models:(DTRC Model Nos. 5470 and 5471. David Taylor Research Center.
2 Howe, M.S., 1978. A review of the theory of trailing edge noise. J. Sound Vib. 61, 437-465.   DOI
3 Klabes, A., Callsen, S., Herr, M., Appel, C., 2017. Fuselage excitation during cruise flight conditions: from flight test to numerical prediction. In: International Conference on Flow Induced Noise and Vibration Issues and Aspects. Springer, pp. 309-324.
4 Lighthill, M.J., 1952. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 211, 564-587.
5 Ianniello, S., De Bernardis, E., 2015. Farassat's formulations in marine propeller hydroacoustics. Int. J. Aeroacoustics 14, 87-103.   DOI
6 Malgoezar, A.M., Vieira, A., Snellen, M., Simons, D.G., Veldhuis, L.L., 2019. Experimental characterization of noise radiation from a ducted propeller of an unmanned aerial vehicle. Int. J. Aeroacoustics 18, 372-391.   DOI
7 Tian, Y., Cotte, B., 2016. Wind turbine noise modeling based on Amiet's theory: effects of wind shear and atmospheric turbulence. Acta Acust. united with Acust. 102, 626-639.   DOI
8 Williams, J.E., Hall, L.H., 1970. Aerodynamic sound generation by turbulent flow in the vicinity of a scattering half plane. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 657-670.   DOI
9 Ozden, M.C., Gurkan, A.Y., Ozden, Y.A., Canyurt, T.G., Korkut, E., 2016. Underwater radiated noise prediction for a submarine propeller in different flow conditions. Ocean Eng. 126, 488-500.   DOI
10 Yu, J., Joshi, M., 1979. On sound radiation from the trailing edge of an isolated airfoil in a uniform flow. In: 5th Aeroacoustics Conf. AIAA. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), p. 603.
11 Chase, D., 1987. The character of the turbulent wall pressure spectrum at subconvective wavenumbers and a suggested comprehensive model. J. Sound Vib. 112, 125-147.   DOI
12 Amiet, R.K., 1975. Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream. J. Sound Vib. 41, 407-420.   DOI
13 Amiet, R.K., 1976. Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge. J. Sound Vib. 47, 387-393.   DOI
14 Brooks, T.F., Hodgson, T.H., 1981. Trailing edge noise prediction from measured surface pressures. J. Sound Vib. 78, 69-117.   DOI
15 Hwang, Y., Bonness, W.K., Hambric, S.A., 2009. Comparison of semi-empirical models for turbulent boundary layer wall pressure spectra. J. Sound Vib. 319, 199-217.   DOI
16 Seol, H., Kim, S.Y., 2018. Study on the analysis of model propeller tip vortex cavitation inception. J. Acoust. Soc. Korea 37, 387-395.   DOI
17 Barbarino, M., Casalino, D., 2012. Hybrid analytical/numerical prediction of propeller broadband noise in the time domain. Int. J. Aeroacoustics 11, 157-175.   DOI
18 Corcos, G.M., 1964. The structure of the turbulent pressure field in boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 353-378.   DOI
19 Gorji, M., Ghassemi, H., Mohamadi, J., 2018. Calculation of sound pressure level of marine propeller in low frequency. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Act. Contr. 37, 60-73.   DOI
20 Hinze, J.O., 1975. Turbulence.
21 Lee, S., 2018. Empirical wall-pressure spectral modeling for zero and adverse pressure gradient flows. AIAA J. 56, 1818-1829.   DOI
22 Moreau, S., Roger, M., 2009. Back-scattering correction and further extensions of Amiet's trailing-edge noise model. Part II: Application. J. Sound Vib. 323, 397-425.   DOI
23 OpenFOAMWiki. Blasius flat-plate flow benchmark. https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Blasius_Flat-Plate_Flow_Benchmark.
24 Parchen, R., 2000. Noise production of ships propellers and waterjet installations at non-cavitating conditions. Proc. 34th WEGEMT Sch. "Developments Des. propulsors Propuls. Syst. 7, 1-14.
25 Choi, W.S., Choi, Y., Hong, S.Y., Song, J.H., Kwon, H.W., Jung, C.M., 2016. Turbulence-induced noise of a submerged cylinder using a permeable fw-h method. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 8, 235-242.   DOI
26 Park, I., Kim, J., Suh, S., Seol, H., 2019. Numerical study on the resistance and self-propulsion of the suboff submarine model in the cavitation tunnel. Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering 24, 50-58.   DOI
27 Rozenberg, Y., Robert, G., Moreau, S., 2012. Wall-pressure spectral model including the adverse pressure gradient effects. AIAA J. 50, 2168-2179.   DOI
28 Ianniello, S., Muscari, R., Di Mascio, A., 2013. Ship underwater noise assessment by the acoustic analogy. part i: nonlinear analysis of a marine propeller in a uniform flow. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 18, 547-570.   DOI
29 Choi, Y.S., Choi, W.S., Hong, S.Y., Song, J.H., Kwon, H.W., Seol, H.S., Jung, C.M., 2017. Development of formulation q1as method for quadrupole noise prediction around a submerged cylinder. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 9, 484-491.   DOI
30 Sanjose, M., Moreau, S., 2018. Fast and accurate analytical modeling of broadband noise for a low-speed fan. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, 3103-3113.   DOI
31 Goody, M., 2004. Empirical spectral model of surface pressure fluctuations. AIAA J. 42, 1788-1794.   DOI
32 Ciappi, E., Magionesi, F., Rosa], S.D., Franco, F., 2009. Hydrodynamic and hydroelastic analyses of a plate excited by the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Struct. 25, 321-342.   DOI
33 Farassat, F., Succi, G.P., 1982. The prediction of helicopter rotor discrete frequency noise, 1982. In: American Helicopter Society, Annual Forum, 38th, Anaheim, CA, May 4-7, 1982, Proceedings.(A82-40505 20-01). American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, pp. 497-507, pp. 497-507.
34 Byeon, C., Kim, J., Park, I., Seol, H., 2018. Resistance and self-propulsion simulations for the DARPA Suboff submarine by using RANS method. J. Comput. Fluids Eng. 23, 36-46.   DOI
35 Casper, J., Farassat, F., 2004. Broadband trailing edge noise predictions in the time domain. J. Sound Vib. 271, 159-176.   DOI
36 Chase, D.M., 1980. Modeling the wavevector-frequency spectrum of turbulent boundary layer wall pressure. J. Sound Vib. 70, 29-67.   DOI
37 Wasala, S.H., Storey, R.C., Norris, S.E., Cater, J.E., 2015. Aeroacoustic noise prediction for wind turbines using large eddy simulation. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 145, 17-29.   DOI
38 Schlinker, R.H., Amiet, R.K., 1981. Helicopter Rotor Trailing Edge Noise. NACA Rep. NASA-CR-3470.
39 Seol, H., Suh, J.C., Lee, S., 2005. Development of hybrid method for the prediction of underwater propeller noise. J. Sound Vib. 288, 345-360.   DOI
40 Spalart, P.R., 2000. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 252-263.   DOI
41 Gorji, M., Ghassemi, H., Mohamadi, J., 2019. Effect of rake and skew on the hydrodynamic characteristics and noise level of the marine propeller. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering 43, 75-85.
42 Liu, Y., Dowling, A.P., 2007. Assessment of the contribution of surface roughness to airframe noise. AIAA J. 45, 855-869.   DOI
43 Choi, J., Seol, H., Park, I., Lee, S., 2019. Study on noise prediction of non-cavitating underwater propeller with hull-appendages effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea 38, 247-255.   DOI
44 Kinns, R., Peake, N., Kessissoglou, N., 2015. Challenges in the Prediction of Underwater Noise Due to Propellers. Acoust. 2015 Hunt (Val.).
45 Williams, J., Hawkings, D., 1969. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Roy Soc London-Philosophical Trans Ser A 264, 321-342.   DOI
46 Willmarth, W.W., Roos, F.W., 1965. Resolution and structure of the wall pressure field beneath a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 81-94.   DOI