1 |
Huther, I., Gorski, S., Lieurade, H.P., Laborde, S., Recho, N., 1999. Longitudinal non-loaded welded joints-geometrical stress approach. Weld. World 43 (3), 20-26.
|
2 |
IACS, 2014. Common structural rules for bulk carriers and oil tankers. In: International Association of Classification Societies.
|
3 |
Kim, C.S., Li, C.B., Kim, Y.H., Choung, J., 2017b. Prediction of crack growth lives of an aged Korean coast guard patrol ship based on extended finite element method (XFEM) J-Integral. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. 54 (4), 335-343.
|
4 |
Fricke, W., Kahl, A., 2005. Comparison of different structural stress approaches for fatigue assessment of welded ship structures. Mar. Struct. 18, 473-488.
DOI
|
5 |
LR, 2015. Ship Right Design and Construction, Fatigue Design Assessment-Application and Notations. Lloyd's Register.
|
6 |
Belytschko, T., Ong, J.S.J., Liu, W.K., Kennedy, J.M., 1984. Hourglass control in linear and nonlinear problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 43 (3), 251-276.
|
7 |
Xiao, Z.G., Yamada, K., 2004. A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joints. Int. J. Fatig. 26, 1277-1293.
DOI
|
8 |
Healy, B., 2004. A case study comparison of surface extrapolation and Battelle structural stress methodologies. In: In: Proceeding of the 23rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
|
9 |
Fricke, W., Sabel, A., 2000. Hotspot stress analysis of five structural details and recommendations for modelling, stress evaluation and design S-N curve. GL. Report No FF99.188.A. Rev 02.
|
10 |
Fricke, W., 2002. Recommended hotspot analysis procedure for structural details of ships and FPSOs based on round-robin FE analyses. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 12 (1), 40-47.
|
11 |
DNV, 2015. Welding, rules for classification ships-3-13 (Det Norske Veritas).
|
12 |
ABAQUS, 2018. User's Manual vol. 2018.
|
13 |
DNV, 2014. Fatigue assessment of ship structures, Classification notes No. 30.7 (Det Norske Veritas).
|
14 |
DNV, 2015. Fatigue Assessment of Ship Structures, Class Guideline DNVGL-CG-0129 (Det Norske Veritas).
|
15 |
Li, C.B., Choung, J., Kim, B.I., 2018. Prediction of stress spectra under low period sea states. Ships Offshore Struct. 13 (1), 56-67.
DOI
|
16 |
Li, C.B., Kim, S.J., Lee, J.C., Paik, J.K., Sohn, J.M., 2014. Dynamic structural response characteristics of perforated blast walls under hydrocarbon explosion. In: Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Thin-Walled Structures, Busan, Korea.
|
17 |
Li, C.B., Seo, J.K., Paik, J.K., 2016. Proposed formulas for evaluation of the equivalent material properties of a multiholed structures. Ocean. Eng. 121 (15), 312-322.
DOI
|
18 |
Lotsberg, I., 2010. Fatigue design of plated structures using finite element analysis. Ships Offshore Struct. 1 (1), 45-54.
DOI
|
19 |
Kim, S.M., Kim, M.H., Kang, S.W., Pyun, J.H., Kim, Y.N., Kim, S.G., Lee, K.E., Kim, G.R., 2008. A comparative study for the fatigue assessment of side shell longitudinal on 8100 TEU container carrier using hot spot stress and structural stress approaches. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. 45 (3), 296-302.
|
20 |
Dong, P., 2001. A structural stress definition and numerical implementation for fatigue analyses. Int. J. Fatig. 23 (10), 865-876.
DOI
|
21 |
Kang, H.T., Dong, P., Hong, J.K., 2007. Fatigue analysis of spot welds using a meshinsensitive structural stress approach. Int. J. Fatig. 29, 1546-1553.
DOI
|
22 |
Dong, P., Hong, J.K., Cao, Z., 2000. A mesh-insensitive structural stress procedure for fatigue evaluation of welded structures. IIW Document XII-1902-01XV-1089-01.
|
23 |
Dong, P., 2005. A robust structural stress method for fatigue analysis of offshoremarine structures. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng. 127 (1), 68-74.
DOI
|
24 |
Dong, P., Hong, J.K., De Jesus, A.M.P., 2007. Analysis of recent fatigue data using the structural stress procedure in ASME Div 2 rewrite. J. Press. Vess. Technol. ASME 129, 355-362.
DOI
|
25 |
Dong, P., Hong, J.K., 2002. A structural stress based master S-N curve approach for welded joints. IIW Document XIII-1930-02XV-1119-02.
|
26 |
Hobbacher, A., 2009. Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, vol. 520. WRC Bulletin, New York.
|
27 |
Kim, C.S., Li, C.B., Choung, J., Kim, Y.H., 2017a. Prediction of crack growth of an aged coast guard patrol ship based on various approaches. In: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Marine Structures, Lisbon, Portugal.
|
28 |
Li, C.B., Choung, J., 2016. Fatigue damage analysis for a floating offshore wind turbine mooring line using the artificial neural network approach. Ships Offshore Struct. 12 (1), 288-295.
|
29 |
Niemi, E., Tanskanen, P., 2000. Hotspot stress determination for welded edge gussets. Weld. World 44 (5), 31-37.
|
30 |
Niemi, E., Fricke, W., Maddox, S.J., 2006. Fatigue Analysis of Welded Components-Designer's Guide to the Hot-Spot Stress Approach. Woodhead Publ, Cambridge.
|
31 |
Xing, S., Dong, P., 2017. Fatigue of titanium weldments: S-N testing and analysis for data transferability among different joint types. Int. J. Fatig. 53, 1-19.
DOI
|
32 |
Doerk, O., Fricke, W., Weissenborn, C., 2003. Comparison of different calculation methods for structural stresses at welded joints. Int. J. Fatig. 25, 359-369.
DOI
|
33 |
Petershagen, H., Fricke, W., Massel, T., 1991. Application of the local approach to the fatigue strength assessment of welded structures in ships. IIW Document XIII, 1409-1491.
|
34 |
Poutiainen, I., Tanskanen, P., Marquis, G., 2004. Finite element methods for structural hotspot stress determination - a comparison of procedures. Int. J. Fatig. 26, 1147-1157.
DOI
|
35 |
Radaj, D., 1990. Design and Analysis of Fatigue-Resistant Welded Structures. Abington Pub, Cambridge.
|
36 |
Remes, H., Fricke, W., 2014. Influencing factors on fatigue strength of welded thin plates based on structural stress assessment. Weld. World 58, 915-923.
DOI
|
37 |
Niemi, E., 1995. Recommendations Concerning Stress Determination for Fatigue Analysis of Welded Components. Abington Publ, Cambridge.
|
38 |
Li, C.B., Choung, J., Noh, M.H., 2018. Wide-banded fatigue damage evaluation of Catenary mooring lines using artificial neural networks models. Mar. Struct. 60, 186-200.
DOI
|