Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.10.002

Application of the Runge Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin-Direct Ghost Fluid Method to internal explosion inside a water-filled tube  

Park, Jinwon (Jangbogo-III Program Group, Defense Acquisition Program Administration)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.11, no.1, 2019 , pp. 572-583 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper aims to assess the applicability of the Runge Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin-Direct Ghost Fluid Method to the internal explosion inside a water-filled tube, which previously was studied by many researchers in separate works. Once the explosive charge located at the inner center of the water-filled tube explodes, the tube wall is subjected to an extremely high intensity fluid loading and deformed. The deformation causes a modification of the field of fluid flow in the region near the water-structure interface so that has substantial influence on the response of the structure. To connect the structure and the fluid, valid data exchanges along the interface are essential. Classical fluid structure interaction simulations usually employ a matched meshing scheme which discretizes the fluid and structure domains using a single mesh density. The computational cost of fluid structure interaction simulations is usually governed by the structure because the size of time step may be determined by the density of structure mesh. The finer mesh density, the better solution, but more expensive computational cost. To reduce such computational cost, a non-matched meshing scheme which allows for different mesh densities is employed. The coupled numerical approach of this paper has fewer difficulties in the implementation and computation, compared to gas dynamics based approach which requires complicated analytical manipulations. It can also be applied to wider compressible, inviscid fluid flow analyses often found in underwater explosion events.
Keywords
Runge-Kutta; Discontinuous galerkin; Ghost fluid method; Fluid structure interaction; Internal explosion; Non-matched meshing;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alia, A., Souli, M., 2006. High explosive simulation using multi-material formulations. Appl. Therm. Eng. 26, 1032-1042.   DOI
2 Belytschko, T., Liu, W.K., Moran, B., 2000. Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. WILEY.
3 Boer, A.d., Zuijlen, A.H.v., Bijl, H., 2007. Review of coupling methods for non-matching meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 1515-1525.   DOI
4 Broglia, R., Manna, M., Deconinck, H., 1995. Development and Validation of an Axisymmetric Navier-stokes Solver for Hypersonic Flows. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
5 Chen, T.J., Cooke, C.H., 1994. On the Riemann problem for liquid or gas-liquid media. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluid. 18, 529-541.   DOI
6 Toro, E.F., 1997. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer.
7 Wardlaw, A.B., Luton, A., 2007. Fluid-structure interaction mechanisms for close-in explosions. Shock Vib. 7, 265-275.   DOI
8 Xie, W.F., Liu, T.G., Khoo, B.C., 2006. Application of a one-fluid model for large scale homogeneous unsteady cavitation: the modified Schmidt model. Comput. Fluids 35, 1177-1192.   DOI
9 Xie, W.F., Young, Y.L., Liu, T.G., 2007. Multiphase modeling of dynamic fluid-structure interaction during close-in explosion. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 74 (6), 1019-1043.   DOI
10 Zhao, Guo-Zhong, Yu, Xi-Jun, Zhang, Rong-Pei, 2013. An RKDG finite element method for the one-dimensional inviscid compressible gas dynamics equations in a Lagrangian coordinate. Chin. Phys. B 222 (2), 020202-1-14.
11 Li, B.Q., 2006. Discontinuous Finite Element in Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer. Springer.
12 Cockburn, B., 1998. An Introduction to the Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Convection-dominated Problems. Springer Berlin.
13 Cooke, C.H., Chen, T.J., 1991. Continuous front tracking with subcell resolution. J. Sci. Comput. 6 (3), 269-282.   DOI
14 Donea, J., Huerta, A., 2003. Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems. WILEY.
15 Fedkiw, R.P., Aslam, T., Merriman, B., 1999. A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows(The Ghost Fluid Method). J. Comput. Phys. 152, 457-492.   DOI
16 Leveque, R.J., 2002. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics.
17 Linder, C., 2003. An Arbitrary Lagrangian-eulerian Finite Element Formulation for Dynamics and Finite Strain Plasticity Models. University of Stuttgart.
18 Liu, G.R., Liu, M.B., 2003. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: a Meshfree Particle Method. World Scientific, Singapore.
19 Liu, T.G., Khoo, B.C., Xie, W.F., 2004. Isentropic one-fluid modeling of unsteady cavitating flow. J. Comput. Phys. 201, 80-108.   DOI
20 Osher, S., Fedkiw, R.P., 1999. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Springer.
21 Sandusky, H., Chambers, P., Zerilli, F., 1999. Dynamic measurements of plastic deformation in a water-filled aluminum tube in response to detonation of a small explosives charge. Shock Vib. 6, 125-132.   DOI
22 Shin, Y.S., Geers, T.L., 1995. Response of Marine Structures to Underwater Explosion.
23 Souli, M., Ouahsine, A., Lewin, L., 2000. ALE formulation for fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190, 659-675.   DOI