1 |
Ogilvie, T.F., 1964. Recent progress toward the understanding and prediction of ship motions. In: The Fifth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Bergen, Norway.
|
2 |
Ran, Z., 2000. Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Floating Structures inWaves and Currents. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University.
|
3 |
Senjanovic, I., Malenica, S., Tomasevic, S., 2009. Hydroelasticity of large container ships. Mar. Struct. 22(2), 287-314.
DOI
|
4 |
Stewart, J., 2009. Calculus. Brooks/Cole, Stamford, Connecticut.
|
5 |
Taghipour, R., Perez, T., Moan, T., 2009. Time-domain hydroelastic analysis of a flexible marine structure using state-space models. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Trans. Asme 131(1).
|
6 |
Watanabe, E., Utsunomiya, T., Wang, C.M., 2004. Hydroelastic analysis of pontoon-type VLFS: a literature survey. Eng. Struct. 26(2), 245-256.
DOI
|
7 |
Chen, X.J., Wu, Y.S., Cui, W.C., Tang, X.F., 2003. Nonlinear hydroelastic analysis of a moored floating body. Ocean Eng. 30(8), 965-1003.
DOI
|
8 |
Cho, I.H., Kim, M.H., Kweon, H.M., 2012. Wave energy converter by using relative heave motion between buoy and inner dynamic system. Ocean Syst. Eng. 2(4), 297-314.
DOI
|
9 |
Bae, Y., Kim, M., 2014. Coupled dynamic analysis of multiple wind turbines on a large single floater. Ocean Eng. 92, 175-187.
DOI
|
10 |
Chen, X.-j., Wu, Y.-s., Cui, W.-c., Jensen, J.J., 2006. Review of hydroelasticity theories for global response of marine structures. Ocean Eng. 33(3), 439-457.
DOI
|
11 |
Cummins,W., 1962. The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions. David Taylor Model Basin, Washington DC.
|
12 |
Hamamoto, T., Suzuki, A., Tsujioka, N., Fujita, K.-i., 1998. 3D BEM-FEM hybrid hydroelastic analysis of module linked large floating structures subjected to regular waves. In: The Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
|
13 |
Iijima, K., Yao, T., Moan, T., 2008. Structural response of a ship in severe seas considering global hydroelastic vibrations. Mar. Struct. 21(4), 420-445.
DOI
|
14 |
Kang, H.Y., 2014. Hydroelastic Analysis Coupled with Nonlinear Mooringrisers for a Moored Deformable Floating Body and Development of Dynamic Positioning System for High Accuracy. Ph.D.. Texas A&M University.
|
15 |
Kang, H.Y., Kim, M.H., 2014. Hydroelastic analysis and statistical assessment of flexible offshore platforms. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 24(1), 35-44.
|
16 |
Kim, B.W., Hong, S.Y., Kyoung, J.H., Cho, S.K., 2007. Evaluation of bending moments and shear forces at unit connections of very large floating structures using hydroelastic and rigid body analyses. Ocean Eng. 34(11-12), 1668-1679.
DOI
|
17 |
Kashiwagi, M., 1998a. A B-spline Galerkin scheme for calculating the hydroelastic response of a very large floating structure in waves. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 3(1), 37-49.
DOI
|
18 |
Kashiwagi, M., 1998b. A direct method versus a mode-expansion method for calculating hydroelastic response of a VLFS in waves. In: The Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
|
19 |
Kashiwagi, M., 2000. Research on hydroelastic responses of VLFS: recent progress and future work. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 10(2), 81-90.
|
20 |
Kim, J.H., Kim, Y., Yuck, R.H., Lee, D.Y., 2015. Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement. J. Fluids Struct. 52, 145-165.
DOI
|
21 |
Kim, Y., Kim, K.H., Kim, Y., 2009b. Springing analysis of a seagoing vessel using fully coupled BEM-FEM in the time domain. Ocean Eng. 36(11), 785-796.
DOI
|
22 |
Kim, Y., Kim, K.H., Kim, Y., 2009c. Time domain springing analysis on a floating barge under oblique wave. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 14(4), 451-468.
DOI
|
23 |
Kyoung, J.H., Hong, S.Y., Kim, B.W., 2006. FEM for time domain analysis of hydroelastic response of VLFS with fully nonlinear free-surface conditions. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 16(3), 168-174.
|
24 |
Lee, D. H. and H. S. Choi(2003). Transient hydroelastic response of very large floating structures by FE-BE hybrid method. The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
|
25 |
Malenica, S., De Hauteclocque, G., 2012. Second order hydroelastic response of the vertical circular cylinder to monochromaticwaterwaves. In: International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Copenhague, Denmark.
|
26 |
Leissa, A.W., 1962. A method for analyzing the vibration of plates. J. Aerosp. Sci. 29(4), 475-475.
|
27 |
Liu, X.D., Sakai, S., 2002. Time domain analysis on the dynamic response of a flexible floating structure to waves. J. Eng. Mechanics-Asce 128(1), 48-56.
DOI
|
28 |
Liuchao, Q.C., Hua, L., 2007. Three-dimensional time-domain analysis of very large floating structures subjected to unsteady external loading. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Trans. Asme 129(1), 21-28.
DOI
|
29 |
Kim, Y., Kim, K.H., Kim, Y., 2009a. Analysis of hydroelasticity of floating shiplike structure in time domain using a fully coupled hybrid BEM-FEM. J. Ship Res. 53(1), 31-47.
|
30 |
Marino, E., Borri, C., Lugni, C., 2011. Influence of wind-waves energy transfer on the impulsive hydrodynamic loads acting on offshore wind turbines. J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodyn 99(6-7), 767-775.
DOI
|
31 |
Marino, E., Lugni, C., Borri, C., 2013. The role of the nonlinear wave kinematics on the global responses of an OWT in parked and operating conditions. J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodyn 123, 363-376.
DOI
|
32 |
Marino, E., Nguyen, H., Lugni, C., Manuel, L., Borri, C., 2015. Irregular nonlinear wave simulation and associated loads on offshore wind turbines. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Trans. Asme 137(2).
|
33 |
Neal, E., 1974. Second order hydrodynamic forces due to stochastic excitation. In: Tenth Naval Hydrodynamics Symposium.
|
34 |
Newman, J.N., 1994.Wave effects on deformable-bodies. Appl. Ocean Res. 16(1), 47-59.
DOI
|