Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.05.010

Model tests on resistance and seakeeping performance of wave-piercing high-speed vessel with spray rails  

Seo, Jeonghwa (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Choi, Hak-Kyu (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Jeong, Uh-Cheul (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha Technical College)
Lee, Dong Kun (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Mokpo National Maritime University)
Rhee, Shin Hyung (Dept. of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Jung, Chul-Min (The 6th R&D Institute-3rd Directorate, Agency for Defense Development)
Yoo, Jaehoon (Dept. of Ocean Engineering, Mokpo National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.8, no.5, 2016 , pp. 442-455 More about this Journal
Abstract
The resistance and seakeeping performance of a high-speed monohull vessel were investigated through a series of model tests in a towing tank. The hull had a slender wave-piercing bow, round bilge, and small deadrise angle on stern. Tests on the bare hull in calm water were first conducted and tests on spray rails followed. The spray rails were designed to control the flow direction and induce a hydrodynamic lift force on the hull bottom to reduce trim angle and increase rise of the hull. The maximum trim of the bare hull was $4.65^{\circ}$ at the designed speed, but the spray rails at optimum location reduced trim by $0.97^{\circ}$. The ship motion in head seas was examined after the calm water tests. Attaching the rails on the optimum location effectively reduced the pitch and heave motion responses. The vertical acceleration at the fore perpendicular reduced by 11.3%. The effective power in full scale was extrapolated from the model test results and it was revealed that the spray rails did not have any negative effects on the resistance performance of the hull, while they effectively stabilized the vessel in calm water and waves.
Keywords
Wave-piercing bow; High-speed vessel; Model test; Seakeeping;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 ASME, 2005. Test uncertainty, The American society of mechanical engineers performance test code, No. 19.1-2005. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
2 Begovic, E., Bertorello, C., Pennino, S., 2014. Experimental seakeeping assessment of a warped planing hull model series. Ocean. Eng. 83, 1-15.   DOI
3 Clement, E.P., 1964. Effects of Longitudinal Bottom Spray Strips on Planing Boat Resistance. DTMB Report, No. 1818. David Taylor Model Basin, Washington, DC.
4 Fridsma, G., 1969. A Systematic Study of the Rough-water Performance of Planing Boats. Davidson Laboratory Report, No. 1275. Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
5 Grigoropoulos, G.J., Chalkias, D.S., 2010. Hull-form optimization in calm and rough water. Comput. aided Des. 42, 977-984.   DOI
6 Katayama, T., Fujimoto, M., Ikeda, Y., 2007. A study on transverse stability loss of planing craft at super high forward speed. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 54 (4), 365-377.
7 Keuning, A., Toxopeus, S., Pinkster, J., 2001. The effect of bowshape on the seakeeping performance of a fast monohull. In: Proceedings of FAST Conference, Southampton, 2001.
8 Keuning, A., Pinkster, J., van Walree, F., 2002. Further investigation into the hydrodynamic performance of the AXE bow concept. In: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on High Speed Marine Vehicles, Castello di Baia, Italy, 2002.
9 Kim, D.J., 2012. A Study on the Running Attitude and Dynamic Stability of a Semi-displacement Round Bilge Vessel at High Speed. Ph.D. thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
10 Kim, D.J., Kim, S.Y., You, Y.J., Rhee, K.P., Kim, S.H., Kim, Y.G., 2013. Design of high-speed planing hulls for the improvement of resistance and seakeeping performance. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 5, 161-177.   DOI
11 Larsson, L., Eliasson, R.E., Orych, M., 2014. Principles of Yacht Design, fourth ed. Adlard Coles Nautical, London.
12 Lavroff, J., Davis, M.R., Holloway, D.S., Thomas, G., 2013. Wave slamming loads on wave-piercer catamarans operating at high-speed determined by hydro-elastic segmented model experiments. Mar. Struct. 33, 120-142.   DOI
13 Lewandowski, E.M., 1997. Transverse dynamic stability of planing craft. Mar. Technol. 34 (2), 109-118.
14 Metcalf, B.J., Faul, L., Bumiller, E., Slutsky, J., 2005. Resistance Tests of a Systematic Series of U.S. Coast Guard Planing Hulls. Report of Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, No. NSWCCD-50-TR-2005/063. Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, Bethesda, MD.
15 Sun, H., Faltinsen, O.M., 2011. Dynamic motions of planing vessels in head seas. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 16, 168-180.   DOI
16 Yousefi, R., Shafaghat, R., Shakeri, M., 2013. Hydrodynamic analysis techniques for high-speed planing hulls. Appl. Ocean Res. 42, 105-113.   DOI