Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0016

Nonlinear soil parameter effects on dynamic embedment of offshore pipeline on soft clay  

Yu, Su Young (Graduate School of Engineering Mastership, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Choi, Han Suk (Graduate School of Engineering Mastership, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Lee, Seung Keon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Park, Kyu-Sik (Steel Business Division, POSCO)
Kim, Do Kyun (Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.7, no.2, 2015 , pp. 227-243 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, the effects of nonlinear soft clay on dynamic embedment of offshore pipeline were investigated. Seabed embedment by pipe-soil interactions has impacts on the structural boundary conditions for various subsea structures such as pipeline, riser, pile, and many other systems. A number of studies have been performed to estimate real soil behavior, but their estimation of seabed embedment has not been fully identified and there are still many uncertainties. In this regards, comparison of embedment between field survey and existing empirical models has been performed to identify uncertainties and investigate the effect of nonlinear soil parameter on dynamic embedment. From the comparison, it is found that the dynamic embedment with installation effects based on nonlinear soil model have an influence on seabed embedment. Therefore, the pipe embedment under dynamic condition by nonlinear parameters of soil models was investigated by Dynamic Embedment Factor (DEF) concept, which is defined as the ratio of the dynamic and static embedment of pipeline, in order to overcome the gap between field embedment and currently used empirical and numerical formula. Although DEF through various researches is suggested, its range is too wide and it does not consider dynamic laying effect. It is difficult to find critical parameters that are affecting to the embedment result. Therefore, the study on dynamic embedment factor by soft clay parameters of nonlinear soil model was conducted and the sensitivity analyses about parameters of nonlinear soil model were performed as well. The tendency on dynamic embedment factor was found by conducting numerical analyses using OrcaFlex software. It is found that DEF was influenced by shear strength gradient than other factors. The obtained results will be useful to understand the pipe embedment on soft clay seabed for applying offshore pipeline designs such as on-bottom stability and free span analyses.
Keywords
Dynamic embedment; Offshore pipeline; Dynamic lay effect; Soft clay; Nonlinear soil model; Dynamic embedment factor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Elosta, H., Huang, S. and Incecik, A., 2013. Dynamic response of steel catenary riser using a seabed interaction under random loads. Ocean Engineering, 69(1), pp.34-43.   DOI
2 Westgate, Z.J., Randolph, M.F., White, D.J. and Li, S., 2010b. The influence of sea state on as-laid pipeline embedment: A case study. Applied Ocean Research, 32(3), pp.321-331.   DOI
3 Andersen, K.H., Kleven, A. and Heien, D., 1998. Cyclic soil data for design of gravity structures. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114(5), pp.517-539.   DOI
4 Aubeny, C.P., Shi, H. and Muff, J.D., 2005. Collapse loads for cylinder embedded in trench in cohesive soil. International Journal for Geomechanics, 5(4), pp.320-325.   DOI
5 Aubeny, C.P., Biscontin, G. and Zhang, J., 2006. Seafloor interaction with steel catenary risers. Final project report (Number: 510, Task order: 35988). Houston: Texas A&M University.
6 Bridge, C., 2005. Effects of seabed interaction on steel catenary risers. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
7 Bridge, C., Howells, H., Toy, N., Parke, G. and Woods, R., 2003. Full scale model tests of a steel catenary riser, Technical paper. Houston: Fluid Structure Interaction, 2H Offshore.
8 Bridge, C., Laver, K., Clukey, E. and Evans, T., 2004. Steel catenary riser touchdown point vertical interaction models. Offshore Technology Conference (OTC 2004), 3-6 May Houston, USA (OTC 16628).
9 Cheuk, C.Y. and White, D.J., 2011. Modelling the dynamic embedment of seabed pipelines. Geotechnique, 61(1), pp.39-57.   DOI
10 Clukey, E.C., Haustermans, L. and Dyvik, R., 2005. Model tests to simulate riser-soil interaction effects in touchdown point region. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG 2005), Perth, Australia, 19-21 September 2011, pp.651-658.
11 DNV, 2006. Free spanning pipelines. Recommended practice. DNV-RP-F105. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas.
12 Merifield, R.S., White, D.J. and Randolph, M.F., 2009. Effect of surface heave on response of partially embedded pipelines on clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(6), pp.819-829.   DOI
13 DNV, 2010. On-bottom stability design of submarine pipelines. Recommended practice. DNV-RP-F109. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas.
14 Dunlap, W.A., Bhojanala, R.P. and Morris, D.V. 1990. Burial of vertically loaded offshore pipelines in weak sediments. The 22nd Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, USA, 7-10 May 1990 (OTC 6375).
15 Merifield, R.S., White, D.J. and Randolph, M.F., 2008. The ultimate undrained resistance of partially embedded pipelines. Geotechnique, 58(6), pp.461-420.   DOI
16 OrcaFlex, 2013. OrcaFlex manual version 9.6C. Cumbria: Orcina Ltd.
17 Park, K.S., Choi, H.S., Kim, D.K., Yu, S.Y. and Kang, S.C., 2015a. Structural analysis of deepwater steel catenary riser using OrcaFlex. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 29(1), pp.16-27.   DOI
18 Park, K.S., Kim, Y.T., Kim, D.K., Yu, S.Y. and Choi, H.S., 2015b. A new method for strake configuration design of Steel Catenary Riser. Ships and Offshore Structures, In-press (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2014.999479).   DOI
19 Poulos, H.G., 1988. Marine geotechnics. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.
20 Randolph, M.F. and Quiggin, P., 2009. Non-linear hysteretic seabed model for catenary pipeline contact. The 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2009), Honolulu, USA, 31 May - 5 June 2009 (OMAE2009-79259).
21 Randolph, M.F. and White, D.J., 2008. Pipeline embedment in deep water: quantification and processes. The 40th Offshore Technology Conference (OTC 2008), Houston, USA, 5-8 May 2008 (OTC 19128).
22 Westgate, Z.J., White, D.J. and Randolph, M.F., 2010a. Pipeline laying and embedment in soft fine-grained soils: field observations and numerical simulations. The 42th Offshore Technology Conference (OTC 2010), Houston, USA, 3-6 May 2010 (OTC-20407).
23 SAFEBUCK JIP, 2010. Phase I, II, III and GEO, joint industry project. [online] Avaliable at:
24 Sun, J., Chang, G.A. and Liu, X., 2013. On the prediction of pipeline as-laid embedment using a cycle by cycle approach for deepwater application. The 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2013), Nantes, France, 9-14 June 2013 (OMAE2013-10485).
25 Verley, R.L.P. and Lund, K.M., 1995. A soil resistance model for pipeline placed on clay soils. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 1995), Copenhagen, Denmark, 18-22 June 1995, pp.225-232.
26 Yu, S.Y., Choi, H.S., Lee, S.K., Do, C.H. and Kim, D.K., 2013. An optimum design of on-bottom stability of offshore pipelines on soft clay. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 5(4), pp.598-613.   DOI
27 Yu, S.Y., Choi, H.S., Lee, S.K. and Kim, D.K., 2014. Trend and review of corrosion resistant alloy (CRA) for offshore pipeline engineering. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 28(1), pp.85-92.   DOI