Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2013.5.1.047

Comparison of residual strength-grounding damage index diagrams for tankers produced by the ALPS/HULL ISFEM and design formula method  

Kim, Do Kyun (Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute), Pusan National University)
Kim, Han Byul (Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute), Pusan National University)
Mohd, Mohd Hairil (Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute), Pusan National University)
Paik, Jeom Kee (Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute), Pusan National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.5, no.1, 2013 , pp. 47-61 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study compares the Residual ultimate longitudinal strength - grounding Damage index (R-D) diagrams produced by two analysis methods: the ALPS/HULL Intelligent Supersize Finite Element Method (ISFEM) and the design formula (modified Paik and Mansour) method - used to assess the safety of damaged ships. The comparison includes four types of double-hull oil tankers: Panamax, Aframax, Suezmax and VLCC. The R-D diagrams were calculated for a series of 50 grounding scenarios. The diagrams were efficiently sampled using the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique and comprehensively analysed based on ship size. Finally, the two methods were compared by statistically analysing the differences between their grounding damage indices and ultimate longitudinal strength predictions. The findings provide a useful example of how to apply the ultimate longitudinal strength analysis method to grounded ships.
Keywords
Grounding damage; R-D diagram; Residual ultimate longitudinal strength; Grounding damage index; Double hull oil tankers;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 ALPS/HULL, 2012. A computer program for progressive collapse analysis of ship hulls. DRS Defense Solutions, Advanced Marine Technology Center, Stevensvill, MD, USA (www.proteusengineering.com, www.maestromarine.com).
2 Brown, A.J., 2002. Collision scenarios and probabilistic collision damage. Marine Structures, 15(4-5), pp.335-364.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Hong, L. and Amdahl, J., 2012. Rapid assessment of ship grounding over large contact surfaces. Ships and Offshore Structures, 7(1), pp.5-19.   DOI
4 Hughes, O.F. and Paik, J.K., 2010. Ship structural analysis and design. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New Jersey, USA.
5 IMO, 2003. Revised interim guidelines for the approval of alternative methods of design and construction of oil tankers. Marine Environment Protection Committee of the Organization by Resolution MEPC 110(49), International Maritime Organization, London, UK.
6 Kim, D.K., 2013. Condition assessment of damaged ships and ship-shaped offshore structures. PhD. Pusan National University.
7 Kim, D.K., Kim, H.B., Zhang, X., Pedersen, P.T., Kim, M.S. and Paik, J.K., 2012a. Development of a relationship between residual ultimate longitudinal strength and grounding damage index diagram for container ships. Proceedings of 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Artic Engineering (OMAE 2012). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 1-6 July 2012.
8 Kim, D.K., Park, D.K., Kim, H.B., Seo, J.K., Kim, B.J., Paik, J.K. and Kim, M.S., 2012b. The necessity of applying the common corrosion addition rule to container ships in terms of ultimate longitudinal strength. Ocean Engineering, 49, pp.43-55.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim, D.K., Park, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B., Kim, B.J., Seo, J.K. and Paik, J.K., 2012c. Effect of corrosion on the ultimate strength of double hull oil tankers - Part II: hull girders. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 42(4), pp.531-549.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Nguyen, T.H., Garrè, L., Amdahl, J. and Leira, B.J., 2011. Monitoring of ship damage condition during stranding. Marine Structures, 24(3), pp.261-274.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Paik, J.K., 2003. Innovative structural designs of tankers against ship collisions and grounding: A recent state-of-the-art review. Marine Technology, 40(1), pp.25-33.
12 Paik, J.K., 2007a. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and groundings (Part I: Theory). Ships and Offshore Structures, 2(1), pp.69-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B., Mansour, A.E. and Caldwell, J.B., 2013. Modified Paik-Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls. Ships and Offshore Structures, in-press (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445302. 2012. 676247).   DOI
14 Paik, J.K., 2007b. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and groundings (Part II: Verification). Ships and Offshore Structures, 2(1), pp.81-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Paik, J.K., Amdahl, J., Barltrop, N., Donner, E.R., Gu, Y., Ito, H., Ludolphy, H., Pedersen, P.T., Rohr, U. and Wang, G., 2003. Collision and grounding, Final report of ISSC V.3. International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress. San Diego, USA 11-15 August 2003.
16 Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B. and Kim, M.S., 2012. A new method for assessing the safety of ships damaged by grounding. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 154(A1), pp.1-20.
17 Paik, J.K. and Thayamballi, A.K., 2003. Ultimate limit state design of steel-plated structures. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
18 Paik, J.K., Thayamballi, A.K. and Yang, S.H., 1998. Residual strength assessment of ships after collision and grounding. Marine Technology, 35(1), pp.38-54.
19 Park, D.H., Kim, D.K., Kim, H.B., Zhang, X.M., Seo, J.K., Kim, B.J., Paik, J.K. and Kim, M.S., 2012. A study on estimation of ultimate residual longitudinal strength of grounded commercial ships. The Annual Spring Meeting of Society of Naval Architects of Korea. Daegu, Korea 31 May-1 June.
20 Pedersen, P.T., 1994. Ship grounding and hull-girder strength. Marine Structures, 7(1), pp.1-29.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Pedersen, P.T., 2010. Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures. Marine Structures, 23(3), pp.241-262.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Simonsen, B.C., Tornqvist, R. and Lützen, M., 2009. A simplified grounding damage prediction method and its application in modern damage stability requirements. Marine Structures, 22(1), pp.62-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Samuelides, M.S., Tabri, K., Incecik, A. and Dimou, D., 2008. Scenarios for the assessment of the collision behavior of ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, 55(1-2), pp.145-162.
24 Samuelides, M.S., Ventikos, N.P. and Gemelos, I.C., 2009. Survey on grounding incidents: Statistical analysis and risk assessment. Ships and Offshore Structures, 4(1), pp.55-68.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Simonsen, B.C. and Friis-Hansen, P., 2000. Theoretical and statistical analysis of ship grounding accidents. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 122(3), pp.200-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Tabri, K., Broekhuijsen, J., Matusiak, J. and Varsta, P., 2009. Analytical modeling of ship collision based on full scale experiments. Marine Structures, 22(1), pp.42-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ye, K.Q., 1998. Orthogonal column latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(444), pp.1430-1439.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Zhang, A. and Suzuki, K., 2006. Dynamic finite element simulations of the effect of selected parameters on grounding test results of bottom structures. Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(2), pp.117-125.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Zhang, S., 2002. Plate tearing and bottom damage in ship grounding. Marine Structures, 15(2), pp.101-117.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Wang, G., Arita, K. and Liu, D., 2000. Behavior of a double hull in a variety of stranding or collision scenarios. Marine Structures, 13(3), pp.147-187.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Wang, G., Spencer, J. and Chen, Y., 2002. Assessment of a ship's performance in accidents. Marine structures, 15(4-5), pp. 313-333.   DOI   ScienceOn