[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2012.4.3.241

Numerical and experimental investigation on the performance of three newly designed 100 kW-class tidal current turbines

Song, Mu-Seok (Dept. Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Hongik University)
Kim, Moon-Chan (Dept. Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Do, In-Rok (Dept. Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
Rhee, Shin-Hyung (Dept. Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Lee, Ju-Hyun (Dept. Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Samsung Heavy Industries, Co.)
Hyun, Beom-Soo (Dept. Naval Architecture & Ocean Systems Engineering, Korea Maritime University)

Publication Information

International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.4, no.3, 2012 , pp. 241-255 More about this Journal

Abstract

Three types of 100 kW-class tidal stream turbines are proposed and their performance is studied both numerically and experimentally. Following a wind turbine design procedure, a base blade is derived and two additional blades are newly designed focusing more on efficiency and cavitation. For the three designed turbines, a CFD is performed by using FLUENT. The calculations predict that the newly designed turbines perform better than the base turbine and the tip vortex can be reduced with additional efficiency increase by adopting a tip rake. The performance of the turbines is tested in a towing tank with 700 mm models. The scale problem is carefully investigated and the measurements are compared with the CFD results. All the prediction from the CFD is supported by the model experiment with some quantitative discrepancy. The maximum efficiencies are 0.49 (CFD) and 0.45 (experiment) at TSR 5.17 for the turbine with a tip rake.

Keywords

Tidal current turbine; Horizontal axis turbine; Power coefficient; Tip speed ratio; Tip rake; Tip vortex cavitation; Minimum allowable immersion for cavitation free; Reynolds number effect;

Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0 (Related Records In Web of Science)

Reference

1	Jo, C.H., Kang, H.L. and Rho, Y.H., 2010. Recent TCP (Tidal Current Power) projects in Korea. Science China Technological Sciences, 53(1), pp.57-61. DOI ScienceOn
2	Kim, S.E. and Choudhury, D., 1995. A near-wall treatment using wall functions sensitized to pressure gradient. In: M. Outgen et al., ed. 1995. ASME FED Separated and Complex Flows, 217, pp.13-18. August, Hilton Head, SC, USA.
3	Kinnas, S.A. and Xu, W., 2009. Analysis of tidal turbines with various numerical methods. 1st annual MREC technical conference. MA, USA.
4	Rourke, F.O., Boyle, F. and Reyolds, A., 2010. Marine current energy device: current status and possible future applications in Ireland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(3), pp.1026-1036. DOI ScienceOn
5	Sauser, B., 2008. Tidal Power Comes to Market. Technology Review. [online] Available at: [Accessed 14 January 2012].
6	Shih, T.H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z.G. and Zhu, J., 1995. A new kappa-epsilon eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds-number turbulent flows. Computers and Fluids, 24, pp.227-238. DOI ScienceOn
7	Stern, N., 2007. The stern review, the economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8	Weiss, J. and Smith, W., 1995. Preconditioning applied to variable and constant density flows. AIAA Journal, 33(11), pp. 2050-2057. DOI ScienceOn
9	Baltazar, J. and Falcao de Campos, J.A.C., 2009. Unsteady analysis of a horizontal axis marine current turbine in yawed inflow conditions with a panel method. 1st International symposium on marine propulsors. Trondheim, Norway.
10	Bahaj, A.S., Molland, A.F., Chaplin, J.R. and Batten, W.M.J., 2007. Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow condition in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank. Renewable Energy, 32(3), pp.407-426. DOI ScienceOn
11	Burton, T., Share, D., Jenkins, N. and Bossanyi, E., 2001. Wind energy handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
12	Drela, M., 1989. XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils. MIT Dept. of Aeronautic and Astronautics, Cambridge, Massachusetts. [Accessed 3 October 2011].
13	Hyundai Heavy Industries co., ltd., 2000. Propeller with curved rake pattern at the tip region. Korea. Pat. 1003944860000.
14	ITTC, 2002. Propulsion, propulsor uncertainty analysis, example for open water test. ITTC-recommended procedures and guidelines. 7.5-02-03-02.2.