Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2011.3.3.181

Research on systematization and advancement of shipbuilding production management for flexible and agile response for high value offshore platform  

Song, Young-Joo (Samsung SDS)
Woo, Jong-Hun (Samsung SDS)
Shin, Jong-Gye (Department of Naval Architect and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.3, no.3, 2011 , pp. 181-192 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the speed of change related with enterprise management is getting faster than ever owing to the competition among companies, technique diffusion, shortening of product lifecycle, excessive supply of market. For the example, the compliance condition (such as delivery date, product quality, etc.) from the ship owner is getting complicated and the needs for the new product such as FPSO, FSRU are coming to fore. This paradigm shift emphasize the rapid response rather than the competitive price, flexibility and agility rather than effective and optimal perspective for the domestic shipbuilding company. So, domestic shipbuilding companies have to secure agile and flexible ship production environment that could respond change of market and requirements of customers in order to continue a competitive edge in the world market. In this paper, I'm going to define a standard shipbuilding production management system by investigating the environment of domestic major shipbuilding companies. Also, I'm going to propose a unified ship production management and system for the operation of unified management through detail analysis of the activities and the data flow of ship production management. And, the system functions for the strategic approach of ship production management are investigated through the business administration tools such as performance pyramid, VDT and BSC. Lastly, the research of applying strategic KPI to the digital shipyard as virtual execution platform is conducted.
Keywords
Ship; Offshore structure; FPSO; FSRU; Platform; Shipbuilding; Production; Management; Knowledge; Simulation; BSC; VDT;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Woo, J.H., 2005. Modeling and Simulation of Indoor Shop System of Shipbuilding by Integration of the Product, Process, Resource and Schedule Information, Ph. D. Seoul National University Press.
2 Lynch, R.L. and Cross, K.F., 1995. Measure up! Yard sticks for Continuous Improvement. 2nd ed. Blackwell Business: Cambridge.
3 Neely, A., 1999. The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Now and What Next?. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(2), pp.205- 229.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Neely, D. Gregory, M. and Platts, K.A., 1995. Performance Measurement System Design-A Literature Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), pp.80-116.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Park, C., 1997. Comprehensive Organizational Performance Measurement System. In:Doctoral Dissertation. Columbia: University of Missouri.
6 Shin, J.G. Lee, J.H. Woo, J.H., 2001. Concept of Digital Shipbuilding. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 38(1), pp.54-62.
7 Skinner, W., 1971. The anachronistic factory. In:Harvard Business Review, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8 Skinner, W., 1974. The decline, fall, and renewal of manufacturing. In:Industrial Engineering.
9 Song, Y.J. Lee, K.K. Lee, D.G. Hwang, I.H. Woo, J.H. and Shin, J.G., 2008a. Development of Shipyard Layout Design Framework based on Simulation. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 45(2), pp.202- 212.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Song, Y.J. Lee, D.G. Woo, J.H. and Shin, J.G., 2008b. Development of Shipyard Layout Design system based on Simulation. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 45(4), pp.441-454.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Steinhauer, D. and Stephanie, M.K., 2006. Simulation Aided Production Planning in Block Assembly. In: COMPIT(Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries), Delft of Netherland.
12 Banks, R.L. and Wheel wright, S.C., 1979. Operations versus strategy-trading tomorrow for today. In:Harvard Business Review. Boston: In:Harvard Business School Press.
13 Betsy, M., 2006. Tearing up the Jack Welch playbook. In: Fortune.
14 Dixon, J.R. Nanni, A.J. and Vollman, T.El., 1990. The New Performance Challenge: Measuring, Operations for World-Class competition, Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
15 Goldraff, E. and Cox, J., 1986. Beating the Competition. In: The Goal, Hounslow: Creative Output Books.
16 Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., 1992. The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance. In: Harvard Business Review. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17 Ittner, C.D. and Larcker, D.F., 1998. Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, pp.107-129.
18 Jack, W. and Suzy, W., 2005. Winning: HarperCollins.
19 Kaarsemaker, J. and Ubald, N., 2006. Simulation of a maritime prefabrication process. In: Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT), Delft of Netherland.
20 Lee, B.J., 2007. Creation Oriented Business Innovation Paradigm. In: LG Business Insight, LG: LG Economy Research Institute.