Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2011.3.1.020

Nonlinear effects on motions and loads using an iterative time-frequency solver  

Bruzzone, Dario (Department of Naval Architecture, University of Genova)
Gironi, C. (Department of Naval Architecture, University of Genova)
Grasso, A. (Department of Naval Architecture, University of Genova)
Publication Information
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering / v.3, no.1, 2011 , pp. 20-26 More about this Journal
Abstract
A weakly nonlinear seakeeping methodology for predicting motions and loads is presented in this paper. This methodology assumes linear radiation and diffraction forces, calculated in the frequency domain, and fully nonlinear Froude-Krylov and hydrostatic forces, evaluated in the time domain. The particular approach employed here allows to overcome numerical problems connected to the determination of the impulse response functions. The procedure is divided into three consecutive steps: evaluation of dynamic sinkage and trim in calm water that can significantly influence the final results, a linear seakeeping analysis in the frequency domain and a weakly nonlinear simulation. The first two steps are performed employing a three-dimensional Rankine panel method. Nonlinear Froude-Krylov and hydrostatic forces are computed in the time domain by pressure integration on the actual wetted surface at each time step. Although nonlinear forces are evaluated into the time domain, the equations of motion are solved in the frequency domain iteratively passing from the frequency to the time domain until convergence. The containership S175 is employed as a test case for evaluating the capability of this methodology to correctly predict the nonlinear behavior related to wave induced motions and loads in head seas; numerical results are compared with experimental data provided in literature.
Keywords
Non linear ship motions; Blended methods;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ogilvie, T.F., 1964. Recent progress towards the understanding and prediction of ship motions. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, 10-12 September Bergen Norway, pp. 3- 80.
2 Beck, R. and Reed, A., 2000. Modern seakeeping computations for ships. Twenty-Third Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Val de Reuil, France.
3 Bruzzone, D., 2003. Application of a Rankine source method to the evaluation of motions of high speed marine vehicles. Proceeding of the 8th International Marine Design Conference, Athens, Greece, Vol. II, pp.69-79.
4 Bruzzone, D. and Grasso, A., 2007. Nonlinear time domain analysis of vertical ship motions. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 7(4), pp. 27-37.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bruzzone, D. Grasso, A. and Zotti, I., 2008. Nonlinear seakeeping analysis of catamarans with central bulb. Proceedings of the 6th conference on high-performance marine vehicles, Naples, Italy, pp. 47-61.
6 Cummins, W.E., 1962. The Impulse response function and ship motions. Schiffstechnik, (47), pp. 101-109.
7 Fonseca, N. and Guedes Soares, C., 2004. Experimental investigation of the nonlinear effects on the vertical motions and loads of a containership in regular waves. Journal of Ship Research, 48 (2), pp. 118-147.
8 Fonseca, N. and Guedes Soares, C., 2005. Comparison between experimental and numerical results of the containership in regular waves. International Shipbuilding Progress, 52(91), pp. 57-89.
9 Pedersen, T., 2000. Wave Load Prediction – A design tool. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.