[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2022.10.S.5

Commitment to Global Open Access Transition Collaboration: Outcomes and Lessons from SCOAP3-Korea

Jung, Youngim (KESLI Secretariat, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), Data & HPC Science, University of Science and Technology)
Kim, Hwanmin (KESLI Secretariat, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI))

Publication Information

Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.10, no.spc, 2022 , pp. 46-55 More about this Journal

Abstract

Eight years have passed since the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics (SCOAP3) was launched. SCOAP3 is one of the most successful global partnerships and funds for Open Access and has been benchmarked by other Open Access initiatives. The Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) joined as the first Asian partner in 2011, and has supported its shared vision and contributed its financial commitment since the beginning of SCOAP3. SCOAP3-Korea is the first bottom-up collaboration for local libraries to re-direct funds previously used for subscriptions to Open Access publishing. This paper explores the roles and responsibilities of KISTI in the Open Access quest. It describes the commitment to SCOAP3 in South Korea, including how the collaboration model for SCOAP3-Korea differs from the global model. This paper also discusses the impact of SCOAP3-Korea by analyzing publications affiliated by Korean authors in SCOAP3 journals for the last six years (2014-2019). We have integrated the national R&D project and research outcome data from NTIS (National Science and Technology Information Service) to investigate the research articles benefited by SCOAP3 and research publications in non-SCOAP3 journals. The positive impact of SCOAP3 in increasing research publication in the discipline was revealed compared to non-SCOAP3 journals. In addition, the financial benefit of SCOAP3-Korea has been proven. With regard to the investment for readers, $137,094 USD was saved during the SCOAP3 Phase 1 and 2, while $748,923 USD was saved with regard to publication fees. We discussed the lessons from SCOAP3-Korea for commitment to a larger-scale Open Access transition.

Keywords

SCOAP3; SCOAP3-Korea; open access transition; outcomes and lessons;

Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By KSCI : 1 (Citation Analysis)

Reference
Cited By KSCI

1	KISTI. (2002). Implementation of collaborative scientific & technological information service systems. Office for Government Policy Coordination.
2	Kohls, A., & Mele, S. (2018). Converting the literature of a scientific field to open access through global collaboration: The experience of SCOAP3 in particle physics. Publications, 6(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6020015. DOI
3	Momeni, F., Mayr, P., Fraser, N., & Peters, I. (2021). What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9811-9827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03972-5. DOI
4	Schimmer, R. (2017). The transformation of scientific journal publishing: Open access after the Berlin 12 Conference. Information Services & Use, 37(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-160808. DOI
5	Bianco, S., Ellestad, O. H., Ferreira, P., Friend, F., Gargiulo, P., Hanania, R., Henrot-Versille, S., Holtkamp, A., IgoKemenes, P., Jarroux-Declais, D., Jordao, M., Kamper, B. C., Krause, J., Lagrange, T., Le Diberder, F., le Masurier, A., Lengenfelder, A., Lindqvist, C. M., Mele, S., . . . Zioutas, K. (2007). Towards open access publishing in high energy physics: Report of the SCOAP³ Working Party. CERN.
6	Choi, S., Cho, H., Choi, S., & Shim, H. (1999, April 1). Construction of database and informatization of Korean Society of Environmental Sciences. Proceedings of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society Conference (pp. 216-219). The Korean Environmental Sciences Society.
7	de Castro, P. (2022). Successful implementation of open access strategies at universities of science & technology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6410867. DOI
8	KISTI. (2012). Final report of 2011 creative management and distribution of knowledge content of national library. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
9	Lariviere, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). Big publishers, bigger profits: How the scholarly community lost the control of its journals. Media Tropes eJournal, 5(2), 102-110. https://mediatropes.com/index.php/Mediatropes/article/view/26422/19602.
10	Lee, S. (2019). SCOAP3 phase 3 (2020-2022) and open access. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association of SCOAP3-Korea, Daejeon, Korea.
11	Schimmer, R., Geschuhn, K. K., & Vogler, A. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals' business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. https://doi.org/10.17617/1.3. DOI
12	Smits, R. J., & Pells, R. (2022). Plan S for shock: Science. Shock. Solution. Speed. Ubiquity Press.
13	Szomszor, M., & Quaderi, N. (2020). Global Research Report. Research integrity: Understanding our shared responsibility for a sustainable scholarly ecosystem. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/campaigns/research-integrityunderstanding-our-shared-responsibility-for-a-sustainablescholarly-ecosystem/.
14	Vacek, A., & Kaliaperumal, C. (2022). Neurosurgical publication-Should we publish at any cost? An in-depth analysis of costs incurred in publication. World Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.021. DOI
15	Morais, R., Bauer, J., & Borrell-Damian, L. (2018). EUA big deals survey report - The first mapping of major scientific publishing contracts in Europe. EUA.
16	Adams, J., & Rogers, G. (2021). The annual G20 scorecard - Research performance 2021. https://clarivate.com/lp/theannual-g20-scorecard-research-performance-2021/.