1 |
Barnes, C. (2015). The use of altmetrics as a tool for measuring research impact. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 46(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.1003174.
DOI
|
2 |
Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1565-y.
DOI
|
3 |
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do "altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309.
DOI
|
4 |
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
DOI
|
5 |
Ezema, I. J., & Ugwu, C. I. (2019). Correlating research impact of library and information science journals using citation counts and altmetrics attention. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(3), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2018-0029.
DOI
|
6 |
Hak, T., Van Rhee, H. J., & Suurmond, R. (2022). How to interpret results of meta-analysis. (Version 1.0). https://www.erim.eur.nl/research-support/meta-essentials/interpret-results.
|
7 |
Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Peters, I., & Lariviere, V. (2014a). Astrophysicists on Twitter: An indepth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0081.
DOI
|
8 |
Kwok, R. (2013). Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark. Nature, 500(7463), 491-493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7463-491a.
DOI
|
9 |
Htoo, T. H. H., & Na, J. C. (2017). Disciplinary differences in altmetrics for social sciences. Online Information Review, 41(2), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2015-0386.
DOI
|
10 |
Kolahi, J., Khazaei, S., Iranmanesh, P., Kim, J., Bang, H., & Khademi, A. (2021). Meta-analysis of correlations between altmetric attention score and citations in health sciences. BioMed Research International, 2021, 6680764. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6680764.
DOI
|
11 |
Meta-Mar. (2021). Meta-analysis: Correlation model. https://meta-mar.shinyapps.io/meta-analysis-calculator/.
|
12 |
Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627-1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071.
DOI
|
13 |
Riley, R. D., Higgins, J. P., & Deeks, J. J. (2011). Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ, 342, d549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d549.
DOI
|
14 |
Saberi, M. K., & Ekhtiyari, F. (2019). Usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations of LIS highly cited papers: An altmetrics study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 20(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2018-0025.
DOI
|
15 |
Schlogl, C., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., Jack, K., & Kraker, P. (2014). Comparison of downloads, citations and readership data for two information systems journals. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1113-1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1365-9.
DOI
|
16 |
Simmonds, M. (2015). Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots. Systematic Reviews, 4, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0004-8.
DOI
|
17 |
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Routledge.
|
18 |
Chi, P. S., Gorraiz, J., & Glanzel, W. (2019). Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators: an altmetric analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1461-1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03168-y.
DOI
|
19 |
Rangaswamy, B., & Rajendra Babu, H. (2021). A correlation comparative analysis of top articles in library and information science using citation and altmetric attention scores. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 58(3), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2021/v58i3/158132.
DOI
|
20 |
Ryan, R. (2016). Cochrane consumers and communication group reviews: Meta-analysis. http://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/meta-analysis_revised_december_1st_1_2016.pdf.
|
21 |
Statistics How To. (2022). What is Fisher Z-Transformation? https://www.statisticshowto.com/fisher-z.
|
22 |
Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2020). Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review. Profesional De La informacion, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.02.
DOI
|
23 |
Thelwall, M. (2021). Measuring societal impacts of research with altmetrics? Common problems and mistakes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(5), 1302-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12381.
DOI
|
24 |
Verma, S., & Madhusudhan, M. (2019a). Altmetric analysis of highly cited publications on digital library in Brazil and India: A comparative study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2273. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2273.
|
25 |
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
DOI
|
26 |
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014b). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3.
DOI
|
27 |
Verma, S., & Madhusudhan, M. (2019b). An altmetric comparison of highly cited digital library publications of India and China. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66(2), 71-75. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229208328.pdf.
|
28 |
Zhang, X., Wang, X., Zhao, H., de Pablos, P. O., Sun, Y., & Xiong, H. (2019). An effectiveness analysis of altmetrics indices for different levels of artificial intelligence publications. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1311-1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03088-x.
DOI
|
29 |
Zhao, Y., & Wolfram, D. (2015). Assessing the popularity of the top-tier journals in the LIS field on Twitter. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010092.
DOI
|
30 |
Sensuse, D. I., Lestari, P. I., & Hakim, S. A. (2021). Exploring factors influencing knowledge sharing mechanisms and technology to support the collaboration ecosystem: A review. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(3), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.03.16609.
DOI
|
31 |
Ahmad, Z. (2019). Profiles of AMU and JNU researchers on Researchgate: An altmetric analysis. Kelpro Bulletin, 23(1), 101-112. https://www.academia.edu/42459122/Profiles_of_AMU_and_JNU_Researchers_on_Researchgate_An_Altmetric_Analysis.
|
32 |
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 36(5-6), 351-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806.
DOI
|
33 |
Cho, J. (2021). Altmetrics analysis of highly cited academic papers in the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7623-7635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04084-w.
DOI
|
34 |
Shrivastava, R., & Mahajan, P. (2015). Relationship amongst ResearchGate altmetric indicators and Scopus bibliometric indicators: The case of Panjab University Chandigarh (India). New Library World, 116(9/10), 564-577. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-03-2015-0017.
DOI
|
35 |
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Lariviere, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833.
DOI
|
36 |
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Lariviere, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One, 8(5), e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
DOI
|
37 |
Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2017). Pakistani LIS scholars' altmetrics in ResearchGate. Program, 51(2), 152-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-07-2016-0052.
DOI
|
38 |
Borah, R., & Madhusudhan, M. (2022). A literature review of research articles on altmetrics. In K. S. Shivraj, A. A. Suleiman, & P. Gupta (Eds.), Knowledge management in higher education institutions (pp. 174-181). Manipal University Jaipur.
|
39 |
Daraio, C. (2021). Altmetrics as an answer to the need for democratization of research and its evaluation. Journal of Altmetrics, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.43.
DOI
|
40 |
Gumpenberger, C., Glanzel, W., & Gorraiz, J. (2016). The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score. Scientometrics, 108(2), 977-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5.
DOI
|
41 |
Israel, H., & Richter, R. R. (2011). A guide to understanding meta-analysis. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 41(7), 496-504. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3333.
DOI
|
42 |
Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22(4), 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/22.4.719.
DOI
|
43 |
Patthi, B., Prasad, M., Gupta, R., Singla, A., Kumar, J. K., Dhama, K., Ali, I., & Niraj, L. K. (2017). Altmetrics - A collated adjunct beyond citations for scholarly impact: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(6), ZE16-ZE20. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26153.10078.
DOI
|
44 |
Zuccala, A. A., Verleysen, F. T., Cornacchia, R., & Engels, T. C. E. (2015). Altmetrics for the humanities: Comparing Goodreads reader ratings with citations to history books. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2014-0152.
DOI
|
45 |
Araujo, A. C., Vanin, A. A., Nascimento, D. P., Gonzalez, G. Z., & Costa, L. O. P. (2021). What are the variables associated with Altmetric scores? Systematic reviews, 10(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01735-0.
DOI
|
46 |
Vysakh, C., & Rajendra Babu, H. (2021). Altmetrics linked scholarly information from Dimensions.ai datasets for the top 100 LIS articles. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 58(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2021/v58i3/158563.
DOI
|