1 |
Emanuel, J. (2011). Usability of the VuFind next-generation online catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 30(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v30i1.3044.
DOI
|
2 |
Dhara, A. (2016). A personalised discovery service using Google custom search engine. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(4), 298-305. http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/ALIS/article/view/13880.
|
3 |
Breeding, M. (2010b). Next-gen library catalogs. Neal-Schuman Publishers.
|
4 |
Antelman, K., Lynema, E., & Pace, A. K. (2006). Toward a twenty-first century catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, 25(3), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v25i3.3342.
DOI
|
5 |
Barber, M., Holden, C., & Mayo, J. L. (2016). Customizing an open source discovery layer at East Carolina University Libraries: The cataloger's role in developing a replacement for a traditional online catalog. Library Resources & Technical Services, 60(3), 182-190. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.60n3.182.
DOI
|
6 |
Breeding, M. (2007). Next-generation library catalogs. Library Technology Reports, 43(4). https://librarytechnology.org/document/12723/.
|
7 |
Keene, C. (2011). Discovery services: Next generation of searching scholarly information. Serials, 24(2), 193-196. https://doi.org/10.1629/24193.
DOI
|
8 |
Comeaux, D. J. (2017). Web design trends in academic libraries-A longitudinal study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2016.1230031.
DOI
|
9 |
Brink-Drescher, J. (2014). VuFind: A NextGen overlay. The Charleston Advisor, 16(2), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.16.2.46.
DOI
|
10 |
Buttcher, S., Clarke, C. L., Yeung, P. C., & Soboroff, I. (2007, July 23-27). Reliable information retrieval evaluation with incomplete and biased judgements. In C. L. A. Clarke, N. Fuhr, N. Kando, W. Kraaij, & A. P. de Vries (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 63-70). ACM.
|
11 |
Vaughan, J. (2011a). Web scale discovery what and why? Library Technology Reports, 47(1), 5-11. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4380.
|
12 |
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016d). DDC in DSpace: Integration of multi-lingual subject access system in institutional digital repositories. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 7(4), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2017.7.4.071.
DOI
|
13 |
Wilson, K. (2007). OPAC 2.0: Next generation online library catalogues ride the Web 2.0 wave! Online Currents, 21(10), 406-413. https://researchportal.scu.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/OPAC-20-Next-generation-onlinelibrary/991012821731902368.
|
14 |
Saha, P. (2018). Using vufind discovery tool is how much replace Germany's traditional OPAC?? International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(2), 268-272. https://www.ijlis.org/articles/using-vufind-discovery-tool-is-howmuch-replace-germanys-traditional-opac.pdf.
|
15 |
Ho, B., Kelley, K., & Garrison, S. (2009). Implementing VuFind as an alternative to Voyager's WebVoyage interface: One library's experience. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942946.
DOI
|
16 |
Adams, J. (2012). Collaborations: The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/490335a.
DOI
|
17 |
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016b). AgriCat: An one-stop shop for OAI-based open access agricultural repositories. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 7(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2016.7.1.277.
DOI
|
18 |
Breeding, M. (2011). Discovering Harry Potter. Computers in Libraries, 31(2), 21-25. https://librarytechnology.org/document/15596/.
|
19 |
Kumar, S., Sanaman, G., & Rai, N. (2008, February 28-29, March 1). Federated search: New option for libraries in the digital era. Proceedings of the 6th International CALIBER (pp. 267-285). INFLIBNET.
|
20 |
Asher, A. D., Duke, L. M., & Wilson, S. (2013). Paths of discovery: Comparing the search effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and conventional library resources. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 464-488. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-374.
DOI
|
21 |
Balaji Babu, P., & Krishnamurthy, M. (2013). Library automation to resource discovery: a review of emerging challenges. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2011-0159.
DOI
|
22 |
Barman, D., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2018). Library discovery system in Bengali script: An experiment with VuFind. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences, 5(2), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.37591/joals.v5i2.815.
|
23 |
Breeding, M. (2005). Plotting a new course for metasearch. Computers in Libraries, 25(2), 27-30. https://librarytechnology.org/document/11341/.
|
24 |
Breeding, M. (2009). Open source discovery interfaces gain momentum. Smart Libraries Newsletter, 29(4), 1-4. https://librarytechnology.org/document/13999.
|
25 |
Denton, W., & Coysh, S. J. (2011). Usability testing of VuFind at an academic library. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138189.
DOI
|
26 |
Breeding, M. (2010a). Library technology guides: Key resources in the field of library automation. www.librarytechnology.org.
|
27 |
Buck, S., & Mellinger, M. (2011). The impact of Serial Solutions' SummonTM on information literacy instruction: Librarian perceptions. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 16(4), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2011.621864.
DOI
|
28 |
Burchill, M. K., & Rasmussen, N. (2014). Implementing VuFind: A public library improves electronic search quality and saves searcher time. Public Library Quarterly, 33(1), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2014.877718.
DOI
|
29 |
Chen, X. (2006). MetaLib, WebFeat, and Google: The strengths and weaknesses of federated search engines compared with Google. Online Information Review, 30(4), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610686300.
DOI
|
30 |
Chickering, F. W., & Yang, S. Q. (2014). Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: An update. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i2.3471.
DOI
|
31 |
Deodato, J. (2015). Evaluating web-scale discovery services: A step-by-step guide. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(2), 19-75. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5745.
DOI
|
32 |
Digby, T., & Elfstrand, S. (2011). Discovering open source discovery: Using VuFind to create MnPALS plus. Computers in Libraries, 31(2), 6-10. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ926247.
|
33 |
Dulle, F. W., & Alphonce, A. (2016). Addressing online information resources' access challenges: Potentials of resource discovery tools' application. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(4), 266-273. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229207291.pdf.
|
34 |
Han, M. J. (2012). New discovery services and library bibliographic control. Library Trends, 61(1), 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0025.
DOI
|
35 |
Jaffy, M. (2020). Bento-box user experience study at Franklin University. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i1.11581.
DOI
|
36 |
Hanneke, R., & O'Brien, K. K. (2016). Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.004.
DOI
|
37 |
Ho, B. (2013). Does VuFind meet the needs of Web 2.0 users?: A year after. In J. Tramullas, & P. Garrido (Eds.), Library Automation and OPAC 2.0: Information Access and Services in the 2.0 Landscape (pp. 100-120). IGI Global.
|
38 |
Ho, B., & Horne-Popp, L. (2013). VuFind - An OPAC 2.0? In J. Park, & L. Howarth (Eds.), New Directions in Information Organization: Library and Information Science (Vol. 7, pp. 159-171). Emerald Publishing Limited.
|
39 |
Hoeppner, A. (2012). The ins and outs of evaluating web-scale discovery services. Computers in Libraries, 32(3), 6-10. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ970478.
|
40 |
Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2012). "Discovering" what's changed: A revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239942.
DOI
|
41 |
Jetty, S., Anbu, K. J. P., Jain, P. K., & Hopkinson, A. (2011). OPAC 2.0: Towards the next generation of online library catalogues. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/7964.
|
42 |
Jones, S. L., & Thorpe, A. (2014). Library homepage design at medium-sized institutions. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.850315.
DOI
|
43 |
Kabashi, A., Peterson, C., & Prather, T. (2014). Discovery services: A white paper for the Texas State Library and Archives Commission. https://librarytechnology.org/document/19732/.
|
44 |
Luther, J., & Kelly, M. C. (2011). The next generation of discovery. Library Journal, 136(5), 66-71.
|
45 |
Katz, D., & Nagy, A. (2013). VuFind: Solr power in the library. In J. Tramullas, & P. Garrido (Eds.), Library Automation and OPAC 2.0: Information Access and Services in the 2.0 Landscape (pp. 73-99). IGI Global.
|
46 |
Katz, D., LeVan, R., & Ziso, Y. (2011). Using authority data in VuFind. Code4Lib Journal, 14. https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/5354.
|
47 |
Lindstrom, H., & Malmsten, M. (2008). User-centred design and the next generation OPAC - A perfect match? https://library.wur.nl/elag2008/presentations/Lindstrom_Malmsten.pdf.
|
48 |
Majors, R., & Mantz, S. L. (2011). Moving to the patron's beat. OCLC Systems & Services, 27(4), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650751111182588.
DOI
|
49 |
Marcin, S., & Morris, P. (2008). OPAC: The next generation placing an encore front end onto a SirsiDynix ILS. Computers in Libraries, 28(5), 6-9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ793035.
|
50 |
Mercun, T., & Zumer, M. (2008). New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 42(3), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330810892668.
DOI
|
51 |
Moore, K. B., & Greene, C. (2012). The search for a new OPAC: Selecting an open source discovery layer. Serials Review, 38(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2012.10765415.
DOI
|
52 |
Narayanan, N., & Byers, D. F. (2017). Improving web scale discovery services. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 64(4), 276-279. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229208282.pdf.
|
53 |
Leebaw, D., Conlan, B., Gonnerman, K., Johnston, S., & Sinkler-Miller, C. (2013). Improving library resource discovery: Exploring the possibilities of VuFind and web-scale discovery. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(2), 154-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.785825.
DOI
|
54 |
Nagy, A., Dierkes, G., & Olsen, J. (2007). "VuFind rocks the house" -- Open-source initiative well received. Compass: New Directions at Falvey, 4(1). https://blog.library.villanova.edu/compass/202.html.
|
55 |
Kronenfeld, M. R., & Bright, H. S., 4th. (2015). Library resource discovery. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(4), 210-213. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.011.
DOI
|
56 |
Narayanan, N., & Mukundan, R. (2015). Choice of discovery: Evaluating web scale discovery services. In M. Bavakutty, & T. A. Abdul Azeez (Eds.), Redefining Academic Libraries in the Knowledge Society (pp. 1-17). ESS Publications.
|
57 |
Hienert, D., Sawitzki, F., & Mayr, P. (2015). Digital library research in action: Supporting information retrieval in Sowiport. D-Lib Magazine, 21(3/4), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/march2015-hienert.
DOI
|
58 |
Houser, J. (2009). The VuFind implementation at Villanova University. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942955.
DOI
|
59 |
Johnston, N., Salaz, A., & O'Connell, R. (2013). Determining usability of VuFind for users in the United Arab Emirates. Code4Lib Journal, 19. http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/7880.
|
60 |
Katz, D. (2016). The triumph of David: A case study in VuFind customization. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(4), 241-260. http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/ALIS/article/view/14527.
|
61 |
Macan, B., Vanesa Fernandez, G., & Stojanovski, J. (2013). Open source solutions for libraries: ABCD vs Koha. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 47(2), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331311313726.
DOI
|
62 |
Martell, C. (2008). The absent user: Physical use of academic library collections and services continues to decline 1995-2006. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 400-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.06.003.
DOI
|
63 |
Mukhopadhyay, P., & Mukhopadhyay, M. (2022). Developing geodetic search interface through auto-generation of geographic name authority datasets. In M. Lamba (Ed.), Technological Advancements in Library Service Innovation (pp. 59-81). IGI Global.
|
64 |
Walker, J. (2015). The NISO open discovery initiative: Promoting transparency in discovery. Insights, 28(1), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.186.
DOI
|
65 |
Thomsett-Scott, B., & Reese, P. E. (2012). Academic libraries and discovery tools: A survey of the literature. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(2-4), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2012.697009.
DOI
|
66 |
Vaughan, J. (2011b). Ebsco discovery services. Library Technology Reports, 47(1), 30-38. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4384.
|
67 |
Vaughan, J., & Hanken, T. (2011). Evaluating and implementing web scale discovery services: Part one. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=libfacpresentation.
|
68 |
Gallinger, E., & Neville, K. L. (2016). Usability in the Pika discovery layer: An academic and public library case study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(4), 261-265. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/39768/1/ALIS%2063%284%29%20261-265.pdf.
|
69 |
National Information Standards Organization. (2013). ODI survey report: Reflections and perspectives on discovery services. https://dfdf.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/UKSG_final_report_16_12_13_by_LISU.pdf.
|
70 |
Nagy, A. (2011). Defining the next-generation catalog. Library Technology Reports, 47(7), 11-15. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4744.
|
71 |
Ronda, R. (2010). Web-scale discovery: A review of Summon, EBSCO discovery service, and WorldCat local. The Charleston Advisor, 12(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.12.1.5.
DOI
|
72 |
National Information Standards Organization. (2012). ODI: Open discovery initiative. http://www.niso.org/workrooms/odi.
|
73 |
Fagan, J. C., Mandernach, M. A., Nelson, C. S., Paulo, J. R., & Saunders, G. (2012). Usability test results for a discovery tool in an academic library. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(1), 83-112. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v31i1.1855.
DOI
|
74 |
Breeding, M. (2015). The future of library resource discovery. Information Standards Quarterly, 27(1), 24-30. https://www.niso.org/sites/default/files/stories/2017-10/NR_Breeding_Discovery_isqv27no1_0.pdf.
DOI
|
75 |
National Information Standards Organization. (2020). NISO RP-19-2020. Open discovery initiative: Promoting transparency in discovery. https://doi.org/10.3789/niso-rp-19-2020.
|
76 |
Parry, M. (2009). After losing users in catalogs, libraries find better search software. Chronicle of Higher Education, 75(6), 54-57. https://www.chronicle.com/article/after-losing-users-in-catalogs-libraries-find-better-search-software/.
|
77 |
Roy, B. K. (2014). Designing institutional digital repository for the University of Burdwan: A FLOSS based prototype. (doctoral dissertation). The University of Burdwan, Burdwan.
|
78 |
Roy, B. K. (2015). Institutional digital repositories: From policy to practice. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
|
79 |
Sarkar, P., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2010). Designing single-window search service for electronic theses and dissertations through harvesting. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 57(4), 354-364. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/17539.
|
80 |
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016a). Status of open access institutional digital repositories in agricultural sciences: A case study of Asia. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1329. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3615&context=libphilprac.
|
81 |
Sarkar, P., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016). Full-text ETD retrieval in library discovery system: Designing a framework. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(4), 274-288. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313383707_Full-text_etd_retrieval_in_library_discovery_system_Designing_a_framework.
|
82 |
Shahi, D. (2015). Apache Solr: An introduction. In D. Shahi (Ed.), Apache Solr: A Practical Approach to Enterprise Search (pp. 1-9). Apress.
|
83 |
Sadeh, T. (2008). User experience in the library: A case study. New Library World, 109(1/2), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800810845976.
DOI
|
84 |
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016c). Open access repositories for Indian universities: Towards a multilingual framework. IASLIC Bulletin, 61(4), 150-161. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323186821_Open_Access_Repositories_for_Indian_Universities_Towards_a_Multilingual_Framework.
|
85 |
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2017). Designing metadata harvesting framework for OAI-based LIS repositories: A prototype. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 15(1), 73-88. https://ijism.ricest.ac.ir/index.php/ijism/article/view/938/294.
|
86 |
Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2018). Designing web-scale discovery systems using the VuFind open source software. Library Hi Tech News, 35(3), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-12-2017-0088.
DOI
|
87 |
Sadeh, T. (2013). From search to discovery. Paper presented at the IFLA World Library and Information Congress 2013 - Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities, Singapore.
|
88 |
Sarkar, P., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2012, February 24-25). Developing virtual union catalogue of ETDs on health and medicine: A practical approach. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Challenges in Library Management System (CLMS 2012) (pp. 334-340). Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science.
|
89 |
Sarkar, P., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2015). Interoperability, Open access and ETDs: the development of Indian initiatives. In 18th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Evolving Genre of ETDs for Knowledge Discovery (November 4-6, 2015, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi) (pp. 290-302). USA: NDLTD.
|
90 |
Seaman, G. (2012). Adapting VuFind as a front-end to a commercial discovery system. Aridane, 68. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/68/seaman.
|
91 |
Way, D. (2010). The impact of web-scale discovery on the use of a library collection. Serials Review, 36(4), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2010.10765320.
DOI
|
92 |
Skinner, D. G. (2012). A comparison of searching functionality of a VuFind catalogue implementation and the traditional catalogue. Library Trends, 61(1), 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0031.
DOI
|
93 |
Tay, A. (2011). Why not web scale discovery tools? http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.com/2011/06/why-notweb-scale-discovery-tools.html.
|
94 |
Vaughan, L., & Thelwall, M. (2004). Search engine coverage bias: Evidence and possible causes. Information Processing & Management, 40(4), 693-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(03)00063-3.
DOI
|
95 |
Webb, P. L., & Nero, M. D. (2009). OPACs in the clouds. Computers in Libraries, 29(9), 18-22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ858684.
|
96 |
Wisniewski, J. (2010). Web scale discovery: The future's so bright, I gotta wear shades. Online, 34(4), 55-57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294420311_Web_Scale_Discovery_The_Future's_So_Bright_I_Gotta_Wear_Shades.
|
97 |
Yang, S. Q., & Hofmann, M. A. (2010). The next generation library catalog: A comparative study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i3.3139.
DOI
|
98 |
Yang, S. Q., & Hofmann, M. A. (2011). Next generation or current generation? A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 266-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138170.
DOI
|
99 |
Yang, S. Q., & Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: How close are we towards next generation catalog? Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 690-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312.
DOI
|
100 |
Sengupta, S. (2012, December 26-27). Open access repositories: The Asian scenario with special reference to library & information science. Proceedings of the Redesigning Libraries & Information Centres in Digital Era (pp. 104-111). Degloor College.
|
101 |
Shi, X., & Levy, S. (2015). An empirical review of library discovery tools. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(5), 716-725. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.85073.
DOI
|
102 |
Singley, E. (2016). To bento or not to bento - Displaying search results. https://emilysingley.net/usablelibraries/to-bento-or-not-to-bento-displaying-search-results.
|
103 |
Sourceforge. (2021). VuFind®. https://sourceforge.net/projects/vufind.
|
104 |
Spezi, V., O'Brien, A., & Conyers, A. (2013). Impact of library discovery technologies: A report for UKSG. https://dfdf.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/UKSG_final_report_16_12_13_by_LISU.pdf.
|
105 |
Taylor, A. (2012). A study of the information search behaviour of the millennial generation. Information Research, 17(1), 508. http://InformationR.net/ir/17-1/paper508.html.
|
106 |
Ganaie, S. A. (2014). Current trends of the open access digital repositories in library and information science. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 4(4), 278-282. https://ijidt.com/index.php/ijidt/article/view/444.
|