Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2022.10.3.1

Analyzing the Impact of Value Satisfaction on Behavioral Intention to Use E-Resources  

Kumar, Vinod (Indian Institute of Information Technology)
Garg, Ruchi Jain (MBA Department, SRMS College of Engineering and Technology)
Vandana, Vandana (Jagannath International Management School)
Zia, Adil (College of Business, Al Baha University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.10, no.3, 2022 , pp. 1-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study investigates the impact of perceived value metrics in driving satisfaction and behavioral intention to use e-resource among its users. Utilitarian, hedonic, uniqueness, epistemic, and economic are key values selected for the purpose of investigation in the study. This empirical study is carried out through a survey and responses have been analyzed using structural equation modelling. The target group is selected by means of simple random sampling (users of e-resources in selected business schools). Findings of the study reveal that utilitarian values, hedonic values, epistemic values, and uniqueness values have a significant impact on the usage intention of e-resources; however, economic values reflect an insignificant relationship to intention to use e-resources. The study is a distinctive piece of work on investigating the most and the least significant value(s) associated with satisfaction and usage intentions of e-resources.
Keywords
business schools; digital library; e-resources; information use; usage intention; value satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327.   DOI
2 Bar-Ilan, J., Peritz, B. C., & Wolman, Y. (2003). A survey on the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the web by the academic staff of Israeli universities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(6), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2003.08.002.   DOI
3 Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics. Sage.
4 Borrego, A., Anglada, L., Barrios, M., & Comellas, N. (2007). Use and users of electronic journals at Catalan Universities: The results of a survey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.08.012.   DOI
5 Boyer, K. K., Hallowell, R., & Roth, A. V. (2002). E-services: operating strategy-a case study and a method for analyzing operational benefits. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00093-6.   DOI
6 Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., Puhakainen, J., & Walden, P. (2006, January 4-7). Adoption of mobile devices/services - searching for answers with the UTAUT. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) (p. 132a). IEEE.
7 Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage.
8 Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Why do users intend to continue using the digital library? An integrated perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(6), 640-662. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2013-0042.   DOI
9 Chong, A. Y. L., Chan, F. T. S., & Ooi, K. B. (2012a). Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.12.001.   DOI
10 Pihlstrom, M., & Brush, G.J. (2008). Comparing the perceived value of information and entertainment mobile services. Psychology & Marketing, 25(8), 732-755. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20236.   DOI
11 Pura, M. (2005). Linking perceived value and loyalty in location-based mobile services. Managing Service Quality, 15(6), 509-538. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520510634005.   DOI
12 Sampath Kumar, B. T., & Kumar, G. T. (2010). Perception and usage of e-resources and the internet by Indian academics. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471011023432.   DOI
13 Saye, J. D. (2001). The organization of electronic resources in the library and information science curriculum. OCLC Systems & Services, 17(2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750110383604.   DOI
14 Sharma, C., Singh, L., & Sharma, R. (2011). Usage and acceptability of e-resources in National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI) and National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources (NBAGR), India. The Electronic Library, 29(6), 803-816. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111188024.   DOI
15 Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0.   DOI
16 Tian, K. T., & McKenzie, K. (2001). The long-term predictive validity of the consumers' need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_5.   DOI
17 Chong, A. Y. L., Ooi, K. B., Lin, B., & Bao, H. (2012b). An empirical analysis of the determinants of 3G adoption in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 360-369. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.005.   DOI
18 Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001.   DOI
19 Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001.   DOI
20 Yang, K., & Jolly, L. D. (2009). The effects of consumer perceived value and subjective norm on mobile data service adoption between American and Korean consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(6), 502-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.08.005.   DOI
21 Colepicolo, E. (2015). Information reliability for academic research: review and recommendations. New Library World, 116(11/12), 646-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-05-2015-0040.   DOI
22 Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014.   DOI
23 Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). How to build an elearning product: Factors for student/customer satisfaction. Business Horizons, 56(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.09.011.   DOI
24 Garg, R. J., Kumar, V., & Vandana. (2017). Factors affecting usage of e-resources: Scale development and validation. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-07-2016-0104.   DOI
25 Ha, J., & Jang, S. C. S. (2010). Perceived values, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: The role of familiarity in Korean restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.03.009.   DOI
26 Habiba, U., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2021). ICT infrastructure and access to online services: Determining the factors affecting faculty satisfaction with university-subscribed resources. International Information & Library Review, 53(2), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1794204.   DOI
27 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
28 Hendal, B. A. (2020). Kuwait University faculty's use of electronic resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital Library Perspectives, 36(4), 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-04-2020-0023.   DOI
29 Zhang, L., Ye, P., & Liu, Q. (2011). A survey of the use of electronic resources at seven universities in Wuhan, China. Program, 45(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331111107402.   DOI
30 Zeglat, D., Shrafat, F., & Al-Smadi, Z. (2016). The impact of the e-service quality (E-SQ) of online databases on users' behavioural intentions: A perspective of postgraduate students. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(1), 1-10. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/1431.
31 Zhang, Y., Lo, P., So, S., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2020). Relating library user education to business students' information needs and learning practices: A comparative study. Reference Services Review, 48(4), 537-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-12-2019-0084.   DOI
32 Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.   DOI
33 Hong, S. J., Tam, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2006). Mobile data service fuels the desire for uniqueness. Communications of the ACM, 49(9), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151030.1151034.   DOI
34 Hong, S. J., Thong, J. Y. L., Moon, J. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2008). Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9096-1.   DOI
35 Hu, P. J. H., Brown, S. A., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2009). Determinants of service quality and continuance intention of online services: The case of eTax. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20956.   DOI
36 Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800305.   DOI
37 Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124183011003003.   DOI
38 Jensen, H. R. (1996). The interrelationship between customer and consumer value. Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 60-63. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/11532/volumes/ap02/AP-02.
39 Joo, S., & Choi, N. (2016). Understanding users' continuance intention to use online library resources based on an extended expectation-confirmation model. The Electronic Library, 34(4), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2015-0033.   DOI
40 Joo, S., & Lee, J. Y. (2011). Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries: Instrument development and validation. The Electronic Library, 29(4), 523-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111156777.   DOI
41 Kumar, V., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. A. (2016). Assessing the influence of stakeholders on sustainability marketing strategy of Indian companies. SAGE Open, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016667991.   DOI
42 Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. 3rd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
43 Kim, B., & Han, I. (2009). What drives the adoption of mobile data services? An approach from a value perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.28.   DOI
44 Kim, Y., Lee, J. D., & Koh, D. (2005). Effects of consumer preferences on the convergence of mobile telecommunications devices. Applied Economics, 37(7), 817-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000337398.   DOI
45 Lee, J. Y., Paik, W., & Joo, S. (2012). Information resource selection of undergraduate students in academic search tasks. Information Research, 17(1), 511. http://informationr.net/ir/17-1/paper511.html.
46 Lopez-Nicolas, C., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2008). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information & Management, 45(6), 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.05.001.   DOI
47 Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003.   DOI
48 Olle, C., & Borrego, A. (2010). Librarians' perceptions on the use of electronic resources at Catalan academic libraries: Results of a focus group. New Library World, 111(1/2), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801011015685.   DOI
49 Madhusudhan, M. (2010). Use of electronic resources by research scholars of Kurukshetra University. The Electronic Library, 28(4), 492-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471011033684.   DOI
50 Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. McGrawHill.
51 Ostrom, A., & Iacobucci, D. (1995). Consumer trade-offs and the evaluation of services. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252011.   DOI
52 Pagani, M. (2004). Determinants of adoption of third generation mobile multimedia services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20011.   DOI
53 Rouibah, K., & Hamdy, H. (2009). Factors affecting information communication technologies usage and satisfaction: Perspective from instant messaging in Kuwait. Journal of Global Information Management, 17(2), 1-29. http://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2009040101.   DOI
54 Setterstrom, A. J., Pearson, J. M., & Orwig, R. A. (2013). Web-enabled wireless technology: An exploratory study of adoption and continued use intentions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(11), 1139-1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.708785.   DOI
55 Lu, J., Liu, C., Yu, C. S., & Wang, K. (2008). Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China. Information & Management, 45(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.11.002.   DOI
56 Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449.   DOI
57 Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004.   DOI
58 Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.   DOI
59 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/35622/b1378752.0001.001.pdf.
60 Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50(3), 894-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.005.   DOI
61 Ameen, K. (2019). Graduate researchers' perceptions and expectations: An exploratory study about reference and information services. Reference Services Review, 48(2), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-02-2019-0009.   DOI
62 Abdul Rahman, A. R., & Mohezar, S. (2020). Ensuring continued use of a digital library: A qualitative approach. The Electronic Library, 38(3), 513-530. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2019-0294.   DOI
63 Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.2307/249577.   DOI
64 Agarwal, N. K., Wang, Z., Xu, Y., & Poo, D. C. C. (2007, July 4-6). Factors affecting 3G adoption: an empirical study. Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (p. 256-270). Association for Information Systems.
65 Al-Debei, M. M., & Al-Lozi, E. (2014). Explaining and predicting the adoption intention of mobile data services: A valuebased approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.011.   DOI
66 Ali, N. (2005). The use of electronic resources at IIT Delhi Library: a study of search behaviours. The Electronic Library, 23(6), 691-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470510635773.   DOI
67 Azonobi, I. N., Uwaifo, S. O., & Tella, A. (2020). Determinants of postgraduates' use of electronic information resources in federal universities in Southern Nigeria. International Information & Library Review, 52(3), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1783629.   DOI
68 Tahir, M., Mahmood, K., & Shafique, F. (2010). Use of electronic information resources and facilities by humanities scholars. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471011023423.   DOI
69 Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., & Tam, K. Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(02)91024-4.   DOI