Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2021.9.3.1

Smart Divide and the Paradigm Shift of Social Capital  

Lee, Seungmin (Department of Library and Information Science, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.9, no.3, 2021 , pp. 1-13 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the current smart device-based information environment, information utilization is closely related to social capital. Additionally, the smart divide that occurs owing to the differences in use of smart devices has a significant influence on social capital. In this respect, this research empirically analyzed how the smart divide affects social capital construction. The study found that the level of and proficiency in using smart devices and diversity of the information formats used through smart devices affect social capital construction. Further, people who fully utilize smart devices can enhance their participation in social activities, social networks, and reciprocal activities, leading people to construct social capital in a wider range. Contrarily, those who are unable to use smart devices adequately may be disadvantaged in terms of the opportunity to construct social capital and share public interests. Thus, to maximize the intrinsic value of social capital, it is necessary to consider the factors of the smart divide as a complicated and multi-faceted digital divide and the ways to utilize social capital as a driving force for integrating society, and not as a mechanism for dividing members of society.
Keywords
smart divide; digital divide; social capital; smart devices;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367.   DOI
2 Bourdieu, P. (1972). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
3 Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
4 Burt, R. S. (1988). The stability of American markets. American Journal of Sociology, 94(2), 356-395. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780779.   DOI
5 Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 Supplement, S95-S120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243.   DOI
6 Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
7 Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67(1), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000271621606700118.   DOI
8 Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the "Net generation". Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x.   DOI
9 Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
10 Keeley, B. (2007). Human capital: How what you know shapes your life. OECD Publishing.
11 Krishna, A. (2007). How does social capital grow? A seven-year study of villages in India. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 941-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00600.x.   DOI
12 Lee, S. (2016a). A study on the creation of social capital through the use of public libraries. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.2.029.   DOI
13 Lee, S. (2016b). Smart divide: Paradigm shift in digital divide in South Korea. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(3), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0961000614558079.   DOI
14 Loury, G. C. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. A. Wallace, & A. M. LaMond (Eds.), Women, minorities, and employment discrimination (pp. 153-186). Lexington books.
15 Molnar, S. (2002). The explanation frame of the digital divide. Information Society, 4, 102-118.
16 Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42. http://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/590/Readings/Putham%201993%20Am%20Prospect.pdf.
17 Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110212.   DOI
18 Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135.   DOI
19 Serageldin, I., & Grootaert, C. (1998). Defining social capital: An integrating view. In R. Picciotto, & E. Wiesner (Eds.), Evaluation and development: The institutional dimension (pp. 203-217). The World Bank.
20 Stone, W. (2001). Measuring social capital: Towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life. https://aifs.gov.au/publications/measuring-social-capital.
21 Kahne, J., & Bailey, K. (1999). The role of social capital in youth development: the case of "I have a dream" programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F01623737021003321.   DOI
22 Kenton, W. (2019). Social capital. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialcapital.asp.