1 |
Aisopos, F., Tzannetos, D., Violos, J., & Varvarigou, T. (2016). Using N-gram graphs for sentiment analysis: An extended study on Twitter. In 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) (pp. 44-51). Oxford: IEEE.
|
2 |
Alom, Z., Carminati, B., & Ferrari, E. (2018). Detecting spam accounts on Twitter. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (pp. 1191-1198). Barcelona: IEEE.
|
3 |
Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846.
DOI
|
4 |
Bart, M. (2010). Twitter usage among college faculty is on the rise. Retrieved November 28, 2019 from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/edtech-news-and-trends/twitterusage-among-college-faculty-is-on-the-rise.
|
5 |
Boskin, M. J., & Lau, L. J. (1994). The contributions of R&D to economic growth: Some issues and observations. Paper presented at Joint American Enterprise Institute: Brookings Institution Conference on the Contribution of Research to the Economy and Society, Washington, DC, USA.
|
6 |
Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 121-136.
DOI
|
7 |
Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (1999). Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 402-408.
DOI
|
8 |
Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018). On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for Finnish articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 69(6), 832-843.
DOI
|
9 |
Hartley, J., & Sydes, M. (1997). Are structured abstracts easier to read than traditional ones? Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2), 122-136.
DOI
|
10 |
Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., & Wilson, S. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169-185.
DOI
|
11 |
Hassan, S.-U., Imran, M., Gillani, U., Aljohani, N. R., Bowman, T. D., & Didegah, F. (2017). Measuring social media activity of scientific literature: an exhaustive comparison of Scopus and novel altmetrics big data. Scientometrics, 113(2), 1037-1057.
DOI
|
12 |
Hidayatullah, A. F., Ratnasari, C. I., & Wisnugroho, S. (2016). Analysis of stemming influence on Indonesian tweet classification. Telkomnika, 14(2), 665-673.
DOI
|
13 |
Ho, Y.-S., & Hartley, J. (2016). Classic articles in psychology in the Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 107(4), 768-780.
DOI
|
14 |
Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1027-1042.
DOI
|
15 |
Htoo, T. H. H., & Na, J.-C. (2017). Disciplinary differences in altmetrics for social sciences. Online Information Review, 41(2), 235-251.
DOI
|
16 |
Kim, T., & Kim, H. Y. (2019). Forecasting stock prices with a feature fusion LSTM-CNN model using different representations of the same data. PLoS One, 14(2), e0212320.
DOI
|
17 |
Mikolov, T., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Puhrsch, C., & Joulin, A. (2018). Advances in pre-training distributed word representations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan.
|
18 |
Piotrowski, C. (2017). Rorschach research through the lens of bibliometric analysis: Mapping investigatory domain. SIS Journal of Projective Psychology & Mental Health, 24(1), 34-38.
|
19 |
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183-195.
DOI
|
20 |
Smart, J., & Bayer, A. (1986). Author collaboration and impact: A note on citation rates of single and multiple authored articles. Scientometrics, 10(5-6), 297-305.
DOI
|
21 |
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 177-184). Minneapolis, MN: IEEE.
|
22 |
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One, 8(5), e64841.
DOI
|
23 |
Thelwall, M., Tsou, A., Weingart, S., Holmberg, K., & Haustein, S. (2013). Tweeting links to academic articles. Cybermetrics, 17(1), 1-8.
|
24 |
Trueger, N. S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C. H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L., & Lin, M. (2015). The altmetric score: A new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 66(5), 549-553.
DOI
|
25 |
Vainio, J., & Holmberg, K. (2017). Highly tweeted science articles: who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions. Scientometrics, 112(1), 345-366.
DOI
|
26 |
Wang, J., Li, B., & Zeng, Y. (2017). XGBoost-based Android malware detection. In 2017 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS) (pp. 268-272). Hong Kong: IEEE.
|
27 |
Wei, F., Qin, H., Ye, S., & Zhao, H. (2019). Empirical study of deep learning for text classification in legal document review. arXiv:1904.01723. doi:10.1109/BigData.2018.8622157.
|
28 |
Weng, J., Lim, E. P., Jiang, J., & He, Q. (2010). TwitterRank: Finding topic-sensitive influential Twitterers. In Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search & Data Mining (pp. 261-270). New York: ACM.
|
29 |
Wieting, J., Bansal, M., Gimpel, K., Livescu, K., & Roth, D. (2015). From paraphrase database to compositional paraphrase model and back. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 345-358.
DOI
|
30 |
Yao, L., Mao, C., & Luo, Y. (2018). Clinical text classification with rule-based features and knowledge-guided convolutional neural networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics Workshop (ICHI-W) (pp. 70-71). New York: IEEE.
|
31 |
Yu, H. (2017). Context of altmetrics data matters: An investigation of count type and user category. Scientometrics, 111(1), 267-283.
DOI
|
32 |
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491-1513.
DOI
|