Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2018.6.3.4

Rediscovering Forgotten Research: Sleeping Beauties at the University of Waterloo  

Demaine, Jeffrey (Dana Porter Library, University of Waterloo)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.6, no.3, 2018 , pp. 37-44 More about this Journal
Abstract
An academic article is normally cited within a few years of publication, after which interest falls off as the research field moves on. However, an article is sometimes ignored for many years only to attract interest after a long period of dormancy. Such articles are called "Sleeping Beauties." A general characterization of this pattern has recently been defined and is used in this study to identify five Sleeping Beauties that were published by researchers at the University of Waterloo in the 1970s and 1980s. While a handful of studies have examined the occurrence of such Sleeping Beauties in specific fields of research or in a particular journal, none has yet identified these unusual articles in the context of the lasting impact of a university's research. This study is therefore a novel application of the latest technique for identifying Sleeping Beauties. The possibilities for using this unusual citation pattern in raising the profile of a university's research are discussed.
Keywords
bibliometrics; sleeping beauties; beauty coefficient; research impact;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Scopus (2018). [Search string = AF-ID ("University of Waterloo" 60014171)]. Retrieved Aug 27, 2018 from https://www.scopus.com.
2 Teixeira, A. A. C., Vieira, P. C., & Abreu, A. P. (2017). Sleeping Beauties and their Princes in innovation studies. Scientometrics, 110(2), 541-580.   DOI
3 van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping Beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467-472.   DOI
4 Zavrsnik, J., & Kokol, P. (2016). Sleeping Beauties in pediatrics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(4), 313-314.   DOI
5 Fraser, D. C. (1958). Decay of immediate memory with age. Nature, 182(4643), 1163.   DOI
6 Glanzel, W., & Garfield, E. (2004). The myth of delayed recognition. The Scientist, 18(11), 8-9.
7 Ho, Y.-S., & Hartley, J. (2017). Sleeping Beauties in psychology. Scientometrics, 110(1), 301-305.
8 Horndeski, G. W. (1974). Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 10(6), 363-384.   DOI
9 Huang, T.-C., Hsu, C., & Ciou, Z.-J. (2015). Systematic methodology for excavating sleeping beauty publications and their princes from medical and biological engineering studies. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 35(6), 749-758.   DOI
10 Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7426-7431.
11 Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (1987). The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 23(1), 41-55.   DOI
12 Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13 Lange, L. L. (2005). Sleeping beauties in psychology: Comparisons of "hits" and "missed signals" in psychological journals. History of Psychology, 8(2), 194-217.   DOI
14 Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On Sleeping Beauties, Princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195-202.
15 Lovelock, D. (1971). The Einstein tensor and its generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 12(3), 498-501.   DOI
16 Mark, J. W., & Todd, T. D. (1981). A nonuniform sampling approach to data compression. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 29(1), 24-32.   DOI
17 Redner, S. (2005). Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review. Physics Today, 58(6), 49-54.   DOI
18 Collins, C. B., Glass, E. N., & Wilkinson, D. A. (1980). Exact spatially homogeneous cosmologies. General Relativity and Gravitation, 12(10), 805-823.   DOI
19 Demaine, J. (2018). DATA.xlsx (version 1). figshare. Retrieved Jun 30, 2018 from https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6464840.v1.
20 Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777-780.   DOI
21 Fine, A. (2017). Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument in quantum theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved Jun 30, 2018 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/qt-epr/.