1 |
Seigfried-Spellar, K. C., & Lankford, C. M. (2017). Personality and online environment factors differ for posters, trolls, lurkers, and confessors on Yik Yak. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 54-56.
|
2 |
Shang, R. A., Chen, Y. C., & Liao, H. J. (2006). The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty. Internet Research, 16(4), 398-418.
DOI
|
3 |
Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7-25.
|
4 |
Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97.
|
5 |
Steiner, P. (1993). On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog [Cartoon.] The New Yorker, 69(20), 61.
|
6 |
Suler, J. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184-188.
DOI
|
7 |
Thiele, P. (2015). Jodel-App: Karma-Punkte. Das steckt dahinter [Jodel App: Karma Points. That's behind it]. Retrieved Jun 30, 2018 from https://praxistipps.chip.de/jodel-app-karma-punkte-das-steckt-dahinter_43924
|
8 |
Wielert, E. (2017). Die Rolle von Anonymitat und Lokalitat in einem sozialen Netzwerk am Beispiel von Jodel [The role of anonymity and locality in a social network using the example of Jodel] (Unpublished bachelors thesis). Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Germany.
|
9 |
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80-83.
|
10 |
Nowak, P., Juttner, K., & Baran, K. S. (2018). Posting content, collecting points, staying anonymous: An evaluation of Jodel. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.). Social computing and social media. User experience and behavior. 10th International Conference, SCSM 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018 (pp. 67-86). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
|
11 |
Peddinti, S. T., Ross, K. W., & Cappos, J. (2014). On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog: A Twitter case study of anonymity in social networks. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Online Social Networks (pp. 83-94). New York, NY: ACM.
|
12 |
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computermediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689-715.
DOI
|
13 |
Saveski, M., Chou, S., & Roy, D. (2016). Tracking the Yak: An empirical study of Yik Yak. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (pp. 671-674). Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press.
|
14 |
Scheibe, K., Fietkiewicz, K. J., & Stock, W. G. (2016). Information behavior on social live streaming services. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 4(2), 6-20.
DOI
|
15 |
Scheibe, K., Zimmer, F., & Fietkiewicz, K. (2017). Das Informationsverhalten von Streamern und Zuschauern bei Social Live-Streaming Diensten am Fallbeispiel YouNow [The information behavior of streamers and viewers in social live streaming services in the case of YouNow]. Information: Wissenschaft & Praxis, 68(5-6), 352-364.
|
16 |
Scholl, H. (2015). Instant profits guide to Instagram success. Budapest: PublishDrive.
|
17 |
McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. London, UK: Sage.
|
18 |
Heinonen, K. (2011). Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers' social media behavior. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10(6), 356-364.
DOI
|
19 |
Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 13-29.
DOI
|
20 |
Gruenderszene (2017). Studenten-App Jodel erhalt sechs Millionen: und will in die USA expandieren [Student app Jodel receives six million: and wants to expand into the US]. Retrieved Jun 30, 2018 from https://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/jodel-studenten-app-usamillionen.
|
21 |
Jordan, T. (2002). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet. New York, NY: Routledge.
|
22 |
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
DOI
|
23 |
Katzer, C. (2016). Cyberpsychologie: Leben im Netz: Wie das Internet uns verandert [Cyberpsychology: Life on the Net: How the Internet changes us]. Munich, Germany: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
|
24 |
Kolodny, L. (2017). Yik Yak shuts down after Square paid $1 million for its engineers. Retrieved Jun 30, 2018 from https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/28/yik-yak-shutsdown-after-square-paid-1-million-for-its-engineers/
|
25 |
Krishnamurthy, B., & Wills, C. E. (2009). On the leakage of personally identifiable information via online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks (pp. 7-12). New York, NY: ACM.
|
26 |
Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331-339.
DOI
|
27 |
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
|
28 |
Black, E. W., Mezzina, K., & Thompson, L. A. (2015). Anonymous social media: Understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 17-22.
|
29 |
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and selfexpression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411.
DOI
|
30 |
Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., Andre, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. G. (2011). 4chan and/b: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 50-57). Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press.
|
31 |
Blumler, J., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
|
32 |
Dibbell, J. (2010). Radical opacity. Technology Review, 113(5), 82-86.
|
33 |
Fietkiewicz, K. J., Dorsch, I., Scheibe, K., Zimmer, F., & Stock, W. G. (2018). Dreaming of stardom and money: Micro-celebrities and influencers on live streaming services. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.). Social computing and social media. User experience and behavior. SCSM 2018 (pp. 240-253). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
|
34 |
Friedlander, M. B. (2017). Streamer motives and usergenerated content on social live-streaming services. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 5(1), 65-84.
DOI
|
35 |
Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., & Stock, W. G. (2018). A model for information behavior research on social live streaming services (SLSSs). In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.). Social computing and social media: User experience and behavior. 10th International Conference, SCSM 2018 (pp. 429-448). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
|
36 |
Wodzicki, K., Schwammlein, E., Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2011). Does the type of anonymity matter? The impact of visualization on information sharing in online groups. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 157-160.
DOI
|
37 |
Zhang, K., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2014). Anonymity in social media: Effects of content controversiality and social endorsement on sharing behavior. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (pp. 643-646). Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press.
|
38 |
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237-307.
|
39 |
Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2014). Entanglements in practice: Performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 873-893.
|