Browse > Article

Citation Impact of Collaboration from Intra- and Inter-disciplinary Perspectives: A Case Study of Korea  

Lee, Jae Yun (Department of Library and Information Science Myongji University)
Chung, EunKyung (Department of Library and Information Science Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.6, no.1, 2018 , pp. 65-82 More about this Journal
Purpose - This research aims to examine collaboration from a disciplinary perspective in Korea. There are needs to explore to what extent researchers collaborate by discipline and across discipline along with the impact of collaboration. Design/methodology/approach - In order to investigate collaboration with respect to entire discipline areas and author-declared discipline information we analyzed a national researcher information database (Korean Researcher Information) with a citation index database (Korean Citation Index) covering the entire range of discipline. This study analyzed the data sets for 10 years (2004-2013) including a total of 8 categories and 119 sub-categories of disciplines, 109,551 researchers, 650,263 articles, and 1,170,039 citations in Korea. Findings - The results demonstrate that there are different intensities of collaboration from heavy to minimal across disciplines. In examining collaboration in terms of author and discipline levels, the results show that collaboration in author level rises, then inter-disciplinary collaboration increases accordingly, in most of the 119 discipline sub-categories. A number of disciplines, however, tended to collaborate more intensely within their own rather than with other disciplines. Moreover, the impact of collaboration tended to change over time depending on the types of collaboration. Specifically, inter-disciplinary collaboration was likely to have more immediate impact as pioneer research, especially among more than three disciplines, whereas the impact of intra-disciplinary collaboration is higher as time passes. Originality/value - In this research, a disciplinary investigation on collaboration is conducted for the entire range of disciplines in Korea. Through analyzing distinctive author-declared discipline information from the KRI, this research examines the intensities of collaboration across disciplines, collaboration in author level, and the impact of collaboration.
Collaboration; Discipline; Intra-disciplinary; Inter-disciplinary; Korea;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016-1030.   DOI
2 Adams, S. J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Paula, E., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259-285.   DOI
3 Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14, 421-433.   DOI
4 Balconi, M., & Laboranti, A. (2006). University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35, 1616-1630.   DOI
5 Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.   DOI
6 Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & Barre, K. L. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855-871.   DOI
7 Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293-305.   DOI
8 Rehn, C., Wadskog, D., Gornitzki, C., & Larsson, A. (2014). Bibliometric indicators: Definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet. Retrieved from p.8
9 Franceschet, M. & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540-553.   DOI
10 Glanzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461-473.
11 Hart, R. L. (2007). Collaboration and article quality in the literature of academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 190-195.   DOI
12 Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(3), 625-636.   DOI
13 Jacobs, J. A. (2013). Disciplines and interdisciplinarity in research universities. Presentation at the National Research Council Meetings on Team Science, October 24, 2013 (p. 3). Retrieved from
14 Korean Researcher Information. (n.d.). Retrieved from
15 Landry, R., Traore, N., & Godin, B. (1996). An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity. Higher Education, 32(3), 283-301.   DOI
16 Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.   DOI
17 Liang, L., & Zhu, L. (2002). Major factors affecting China's inter-regional research collaboration: Regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity. Scientometrics, 55(2), 287-316.   DOI
18 Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323-1332.   DOI
19 Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.   DOI
20 Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438-443.   DOI
21 Lutz, M. A. (1999). Economics for the common good: Two centuries of economic thought in the humanist tradition (p. 219). London and New York: Routledge.
22 Mairesse, J., & Turner, L. (2005). Measurement and explanation of the intensity of co-publication in scientific research: An analysis at the laboratory level. Nber Working Paper Series, w11172.
23 Medoff, M. (2003). Collaboration and the quality of economics research. Labour Economics, 10(5), 597-608.   DOI
24 Nagurney, A., & Qiang, Q. (2010). A knowledge collaboration network model across disciplines. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling, and Prediction (SBP 2010) (pp. 138-148), Bethesda, MD, USA, March 30-31, 2010.
25 R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.1.2). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from.
26 Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research policy, 40(3), 463-472.   DOI
27 Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57, 155- 171.   DOI
28 Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration of the impact of the research results. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423-428.   DOI