Browse > Article

Measurement of Global Nursing Research Output: A Bibliometric Study (1996-2015)  

Singh, Shivendra (All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS))
Pandita, Ramesh (BGSB University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.6, no.1, 2018 , pp. 31-44 More about this Journal
Purpose: This study aims to examine the research output in the field of nursing at the global level during the last two decades, viz., for the period 1996-2015, with special reference to India. Some of the aspects examined include the research growth in nursing literature during the period of study, leading nursing research countries at the regional and global level, and citation analysis. Scope and Methodology: This study is global in nature, but emphasis has also been laid on India's research contribution in nursing at the global level. Aspects like regional contribution to the nursing research output have also been assessed. This study is purely based on secondary data retrieved from SCImago Journal and Country Rankings. The figures in the study are based on one particular database and are not exhaustive; hence they simply reflect a trend in nursing research at the global level. Findings: During the period 1996 through 2015, a total of 550,490 research articles were published across the world by 212 nation states at an average of 2,596 articles from each individual country. On average, during the period of study, the number of nursing research publications grew at the rate of 7.36% each year. North America has emerged as one of the leading nursing research continents of the world by publishing 218,614 research articles, constituting 39.71% of the global nursing research output. The U.S. and U.K. are the world's two leading nursing research countries, which contributed 193,819 and 61,730 research articles respectively, comprising a 35.21% and 11.21% share of global nursing research output. India and China, apart from being the two fastest growing nursing research countries, have the potential to meet the global human resource demand in the field of nursing, given the skilled and trained human resource both these countries possess in nursing. Social Implication: There is always a need to share working knowledge in some professions and nursing is one of them. There cannot be a better medium than linking practice with theory through the research medium. Metric studies in turn help to get a better idea about the amount of work done in any given field at the national and international level, thus identifying the need thereof to improve upon those areas where there is research lag.
nursing research; SCImago; continents; research output; research growth; India; world;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Molassiotis, A., Gibson, F., Kelly, D., Richardson, A., Dabbour, R., Ahmad, A., & Kearney, N. (2006). A systematic review of worldwide cancer nursing research: 19... : Cancer nursing. Cancer Nursing, 29(6), 431-440.   DOI
2 Moody, L. E., Wilson, M. E., Smyth, K., Schwartz, R., Tittle, M., & Van Cott, M. L. (1988). Analysis of a decade of nursing practice research: 1977-1986. Nurs Res, 37(6), 374-379. doi:10.1097/00006199-198811000-00012   DOI
3 Murphy, E., & Freston, M. S. (1991). An analysis of theory-research linkages in published gerontologic nursing studies, 1983-1989. ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 13(4), 1-13. doi:10.1097/00012272-199106000-00003   DOI
4 Palese, A., Basone, D., & Mestroni, F. (2014). Neuroscience nursing research: trend analysis from 1989 to 2010. J Neurosci Nurs, 46(3), 187-195. doi:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000051   DOI
5 Pardo, C., Reolid, M., Delicado, M. V., Mallebrera, E., & Garcia-Meseguer, M. J. (2001). Nursing research in Spain: Bibliometrics of references of research papers in the decade 1985-1994. J Adv Nurs, 35(6), 933-943. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01931.x   DOI
6 Peng, J., & Hui, Z. Y. (2011). Nursing research in three regions in China: Abibliometric study. International Nursing Review, 58(1), 21-25. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2010.00873.x   DOI
7 Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2009). International differences in nursing research, 2005-2006. J Nurs Scholarsh, 41(1), 44-53. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01250.x   DOI
8 SCImago Lab. (2015). SCImago journal & country rank. Retrieved from
9 Scott, S. D., Profetto-McGrath, J., Estabrooks, C. A., Winther, C., Wallin, L., & Lavis, J. N. (2010). Mapping the knowledge utilization field in nursing from 1945 to 2004: A bibliometric analysis. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 7(4), 226-237. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00197.x   DOI
10 Smith, D. R., & Hazelton, M. (2008). Bibliometrics, citation indexing, and the journals of nursing. Nursing & Health Sciences, 10(4), 260-265. doi:10.1111/j.14422018.2008.00414.x   DOI
11 Traynor, M., Rafferty, A. M., & Lewison, G. (2001). Endogenous and exogenous research? Findings from a bibliometric study of UK nursing research. J Adv Nurs, 34(2), 212-222. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01747.x   DOI
12 VanCott, M. L., Tittle, M. B., Moody, L. E., & Wilson, M. E. (1991). Analysis of a decade of critical care nursing practice research: 1979 to 1988. Heart Lung, 20(4), 394-397.
13 Wilkes, L., Borbasi, S., Hawes, C., Stewart, M., & May, D. (2002). Measuring the outputs of nursing research and development in Australia: The researchers. Aust J Adv Nurs, 19(4), 15-20.
14 Zhang, X. C., Huang, D. S., & Li, F. (2011). Cancer nursing research output and topics in the first decade of the 21st century: Results of a bibliometric and co-word cluster analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12(8), 2055-2058.
15 Davis, P. M. (2013). What is the life span of a research article. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from
16 Allen, M. P., Jacobs, S. K., & Levy, J. R. (2006). Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996-2000. J Med Libr Assoc, 94(2), 206-220.
17 Beal, J. A., & Betz, C. L. (1992). Intervention studies in pediatric nursing research: A decade of review. Pediatr Nurs, 18(6), 586-590.
18 Bosworth, D. L. (1978). The rate of obsolescence of technical knowledge- A note. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 26(3), 273-273. doi:10.2307/2097871   DOI
19 Dilorio, C., Yeager, K. A., Donahue, B. H., Wasserman, J., Postier, A., & Broderick, L. (2004). An evaluation of neuroscience nursing research published during the Decade of the Brain. J Neurosci Nurs, 36(2), 58-66, 71. doi:10.1097/01376517-200404000-00002   DOI
20 Estabrooks, C. A., Winther, C., & Derksen, L. (2004). Mapping the field: Abibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nurs Res, 53(5), 293-303. doi:10.1097/00006199-200409000-00003   DOI
21 Jordan, S., Knight, J., & Pointon, D. (2004). Monitoring adverse drug reactions: Scales, profiles, and checklists. Int Nurs Rev, 51(4), 208-221. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2004.00251.x   DOI
22 Mendoza-Parra, S., Paravic-Klijn, T., Munoz-Munoz, A. M., Barriga, O. A., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (2009). Visibility of Latin American nursing research (1959-2005). Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41(1), 54-63. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01251.x   DOI