Browse > Article

Understanding Information Sharing Among Scientists Through a Professional Online Community: Analyses on Interaction Patterns and Contents  

Shin, Eun-Ja (Department of Communication Arts Sejong University)
Lee, Guiohk (Department of Communication Arts Sejong University)
Choi, Heeyoon (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.5, no.4, 2017 , pp. 26-38 More about this Journal
Even through many professional organizations increasingly use Q&A sites in their online communities for information sharing, there are few studies which examine what is really going on in the Q&A activities in professional online communities (POC). This study aims to examine the interaction patterns and contents posted in the Q&A site of a POC, KOSEN, a science and technology online community in South Korea, focusing on how actively scientific information and knowledge are shared. The interaction patterns among the participants were identified through social network analysis (SNA) and the contents in the Q&As were examined by content analysis. The results show that the overall network indicated a moderate level of participation and connection and answerers especially tended to be active. Also, there are different interaction patterns depending on academic fields. Relatively few participants were posting leaders who seemed to steer the overall interactions. Furthermore, some content related to manipulation and explanation for experiments, which are in urgent need, seem to be posted in the sites more frequently with more amounts. Combining both SNA and content analysis, this study demonstrated how actively information and knowledge is shared and what types of contents are exchanged. The findings have practical implications for POC managers and practitioners.
information sharing; professional online community; interaction pattern; SNA; content analysis; KOSEN;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008). Knowledge sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone knows something. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, 2008 (pp. 665-674). ACM.
2 Baek, S. I., & Kim, Y. M. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of online community dynamics. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 115(4), 661-677.   DOI
3 Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4 Bozdogan, H., & Akbilgic, O. (2013). Social network analysis of scientific collaborations across different subject fields. Information Services & Use, 33(3/4), 219-233.   DOI
5 Butler, B., Sproull, L, Kiesler, S. & Kraut, R. (2002). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why. In S. P. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically supported work (pp. 171-94). Oxon, UK: Psychology Press.
6 Chen, I. Y. L. (2007). The factors influencing members' continuance intention in professional virtual communities- A longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451-467.   DOI
7 Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.   DOI
8 Choi, E., & Shah, C. (2016). User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1182-1197.   DOI
9 Cranefield, J., & Yoong, P. (2009). Crossings: Embedding personal professional knowledge in a complex online community environment. Online Information Review, 33(2): 257-275.
10 Faraj, S., & Johnson, S. L. (2011). Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organization Science, 22(6), 1464-1480.   DOI
11 Hasmuni, N., Sulaiman, N. I. S., & Zaibidi, N. Z. (2014). Social network analysis in identifying Influential webloggers: A preliminary study. International conference on qualitative science and its applications (pp. 301-307), Kedah, Malaysia, 2007.
12 Hossain, L., & Fazio, D. (2009). The social networks of collaborative process. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(2), 119-130.   DOI
13 Hung, S. Y., Lai, H. M., & Chou, Y. C. (2015). Knowledge‐sharing intention in professional virtual communities: A comparison between posters and lurkers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2494-2510.   DOI
14 Hwang, Y. (2015). Seeking solving solutions on social issue using KOSEN. Proceedings of the 35th Korean Society for Library and Information Science (pp. 31-44). Seoul.
15 Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(3), 723-747.
16 Kim, J., & Yoon, J. (2011). Activation of knowledge exchange in the researcher community (in Korean). Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(12), 950-957.   DOI
17 Luarn, P., Lin, Y. F., & Chiu, Y. P. (2015). Influence of Facebook brand-page posts on online engagement. Online Information Review, 39(4), 505-519.   DOI
18 Kim, Y., Park, P., & Jeon, S. (2006). An analysis on structure of online social networks (in Korean). Informatization Policy, 13(4), 167-185.
19 Lai, H., Chen, P., & Chang, Y. (2014). Determinants of knowledge seeking in professional virtual communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(5), 522-535.   DOI
20 Li, X., Gray, K., Verspoor, K., & Barnett, S. (2016). Analysing health professionals' learning interactions in online social networks: A social network analysis approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.02883.
21 Pfeil, U., & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Investigating social network patterns within an empathic online community for older people. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1139-1155.   DOI
22 Wang, G. A., Liu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, M., & Fan, W. (2015). Examining micro-level knowledge sharing discussions in online communities. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(6), 1227-1238.   DOI
23 Rosenbaum, H., & Shachaf, P. (2010). A structuration approach to online communities of practice: The case of Q&A communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1933-1944.   DOI
24 Taylor, I. (1980). The Korean writing system: An alphabet? A syllabary? A logography? In Kolers, P. A., Wrolstad, M. E., & Bouma, H., Processing of visual language (pp.67-82). New York: Plenum Press.
25 Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A Study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers' online professional community of practice. Computers and Education, 72, 37-47.   DOI
26 Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: University Press.
27 Zhu, E., 2006. Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451-480.   DOI
28 Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.   DOI
29 Zhang, M., & Liu, S. (2014). Study on knowledge management behaviors in teachers' online communities of practice. 2014 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (pp. 230-235). Beijing, 2014.