Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2017.5.1.3

Perceptions and Use of Open Access Journals by Nigerian Postgraduate Students  

Ayeni, Philips Oluwaseun (Fidelis Oditah & Co.)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.5, no.1, 2017 , pp. 26-46 More about this Journal
Abstract
This article investigates perceptions and use of Open Access journals (OAJs) by master's degree students in two universities in the southwestern part of Nigeria. A descriptive survey design was used in the study and the study population was comprised of 7,423 master's degree students in the University of Ibadan and 1,867 from Obafemi Awolowo University. A multistage random sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 249 and the data collection instrument was a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, mean, standard deviation, correlation, and regression analyses. The findings revealed that OAJs were used for learning, dissertation writing, personal research, and development. OAJs were not frequently used because of download delays, unavailability of Internet facilities, and limited access to computers terminals, among other issues. OAJs were found to be of relative advantage, positively perceived, and found to be compatible with existing values and quality assurance in scholarly publications, hence their use for academic activities. The regression analyses showed that there was a significant positive relationship between positive perception, perception of relative advantage, perception of compatibility, perception complexity, and master's degree students' use of OAJs. Negative perception was found to have a significant negative correlation with the use of OAJs. This article recommends that quality assurance of OAJs should be ensured in order to boost users' positive perceptions to increase their patronage and usage of these scholarly outlets for various academic activities, which will in turn encourage research and development across the various institutions of higher learning in Nigeria.
Keywords
Perception; Use of Open Access Journals; Postgraduate students; Nigeria;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Akpochafo, W. P. (2009). Revitalizing research in Nigerian universities for national development. Educational Research and Review, 4(5), 247-251.
2 Anunobi, C. V, Okoye, I., & James-Chima, N. (2012). Citation analysis of postgraduate students as a measure of their resource preference. International Journal of Social Science and Education, 2(4), 646-656. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00005180
3 Bhattacherjee, A., & Hikmet, N. (2007). Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(6), 725-737.   DOI
4 Liu, C. C., Lu, K. H., Wu, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The impact of peer review on creative self-efficacy and learning performance in Web 2.0 learning activities. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 286-297.
5 Chilimo, W. L. (2008). Training in online search skills at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania: The use of TEEAL and AGRORA databases. University of Dar es Salaam Journal, 10(1&2), 68-80.
6 Christian, G. M. (2008). Issues and challenges to the development of Open Access institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria. A paper prepared for the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Retrieved from http://Idl.-Bnc.Idrc.Ca/Dspace/Handle/123456789/36986/1/127792.Pdf.
7 Deng, H. (2010). Emerging patterns and trends in utilizing electronic resources in a higher education environment: An empirical analysis. New Library World, 111(3-4), 87-103. doi: 101108/037480011027600   DOI
8 Dulle. F. W, Minishi-Majanja. M. K., & Cloete, L. M. (2009). The adoption of Open Access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities: Some influencing factors. Mousaion, 29(1), retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=3513841f-a78a-4e1f-aad8-aae7043b3c0c%40sessionmgr4003&vid=0&hid=4209.
9 Dulle, F. W. (2010). An analysis of Open Access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities (Ph.D. thesis). University of South Africa. Pretoria. Retrieved from http://Uir.Unisa.Ac.Za/Bitstream/Handle/10500/3684/Thesis_Dulle_F.Pdf.
10 Dulle, F. W. (2011) Acceptance and usage of Open Access scholarly communication by postgraduate students at the Sokoine University of Agriculture and the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 21(1), 17-28.
11 Eger, A. (2008). Database statistics applied to investigate the effects of electronic information services on publication of academic research - A comparative study covering Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. GMS Med Bibl Information, 8(1), retrieved from http://Www.Egms.De/En/Journals/Mbi/2008-8/Mbi000104.Shtml
12 Ekvall, G., Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. L., & Britz, A. (2000). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.   DOI
13 Olajide-Williams, F. K., & Popoola, S. O. (2013). Effects of self concept and information perception on creativity of senior administrative personnel in federal universities in southwest Nigeria. Nigeria Library and Information Science Review, 22(1&2), 66-85.
14 Pandurangaswamy, S., & Kishore, K. (2013). Use of e-resources by postgraduate students of the institute for financial management and research (IFMR), Chennai, India. E-Library Science Research Journal, 1(12), 1-11.
15 Pickton, M. J. (2005). Research students and the Loughborough institutional repository (Masters dissertation). UK: University of Loughborough. Retrieved from http://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2134/571/1/Miggie_dissertation.pdf.
16 Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
17 Eqbal, M., & Khan, A. (2007). Use of electronic journals by the research scholars of Faculty of Science and Faculty of Engineering, Amu, Aligarh: A comparative study. In Library and Information Networking (NACLIN). Paper presented at the Tenth National Convention on Knowledge, Library and Information Networking (DELNET-Developing Library Network DELNET), New Delhi (pp. 98-132).
18 Fang, C., & Zhu, X (2006). The Open Access movement in China. Interlending & Document Supply, 34(4), 186-193.   DOI
19 Geib, A. (2013) Advantages and Disadvantages of Open Access. Retrieved from http://www.edanzediting.com/blog/advantages_and_disadvantages_open_access#.VcxeCZjSX_c.
20 Gross, J., & Ryan, J. C. (2015) Landscapes of research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) publishing in the arts and humanities. Publications 2015, 3(2), 65-88. doi: 10.3390/publications3020065.   DOI
21 Habiba, U., & Chowdhury, S. (2012). Use of electronic resources and its impact: A study of Dhaka University Library users. Eastern Librarian, 23(1), 74-90.
22 Hernandez, B., Jimenez, J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Business management software in high-tech firms: The case of the IT services sector. Journal of Business &Industrial Marketing, 25(2), 132-146.   DOI
23 Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2005). Open access self-archiving: an author survey. Retrieved from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10999.
24 Saeed, K. A., & Muthitacharoen, A. (2008). To send or not to send: An empirical assessment of error reporting behavior. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 55(3), 455-467.   DOI
25 Schroter, S., & Tite, L. (2006). Open access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, retrieved from http://www.Jrsm.Org/Cgi/Content/Full/99/3/141.
26 Son, J., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Organizational buyers' adoption and use of B2B electronic marketplaces: Efficiency-and legitimacy-oriented perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 55-99.   DOI
27 Utulu, S. C., & Bolarinwa, O. (2009). Open access initiatives adoption by Nigerian academics. Library Review, 58(9), 660-669.   DOI
28 Warlick, S. E., & Voughan, K. T. (2006). Factor influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose Open Access. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 4(1), retrieved from http://www.Pubmedcentral.Nih.Gov/Picrender.Fcgi?Article=1832218blobtype=Pdf.
29 Hirwade, M. A., & Rajyalakshmi, D. (2006). Open access: India is moving towards the third world super powers. Retrieved from http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/dxml/bitstream/handle/1944/537/828cal2006_29.pdf?sequence.
30 Hung, S. P, Huang, H. Y, & Lin, S. S. (2008). Do significant others' feedback influences one's creative behavior? Using structural equation modeling to examine creativity self-efficacy and creativity motivation effect. Bulletin of Education Psychology, 40(2), 303-322.
31 Ivwighreghweta, O., & Onoriode, K. O. (2012). Awareness of Open Access scholarly publication among lecturers in university of Benin, Edo State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 1-11.
32 Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752-780.
33 Lin, J., Chan, H. C., & Wei, K. K. (2006). Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1338-1349.   DOI
34 McKenzie, J. (2001). How teachers learn technology best. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, 10(6), retrieved from http://www.fno.org/mar01/howlearn.html.
35 Mohammed, A., & Garba, A. (2013). Awareness and use of Open Access scholarly publications by postgraduate students of Faculty of Science in Ahmadu Bello University Zaria (ABU), Kaduna State, Nigeria. Samaru Journal of Information Studies, 13(1&2), 61-68.
36 Muthayan, S. (2003). Open access research and the public domain in South African: The Public Knowledge Project's Open Journal Systems. Paper presented at The International Symposium on Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science, UNESCO, Paris.
37 Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (2000). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of Information Technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557-582.   DOI