Browse > Article

Retrieval of Legal Information Through Discovery Layers: A Case Study Related to Indian Law Libraries  

Kushwah, Shivpal Singh (National Law Institute University (NLIU) Kerwa Dam Road, Bhopal (MP) India)
Singh, Ritu (Bundelkhand University Jhansi (UP) India)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.4, no.3, 2016 , pp. 71-83 More about this Journal
Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and evaluate discovery layer search tools for retrieval of legal information in Indian law libraries. This paper covers current practices in legal information retrieval with special reference to Indian academic law libraries, and analyses its importance in the domain of law.Design/Methodology/Approach. A web survey and observational study method are used to collect the data. Data related to the discovery tools were collected using email and further discussion held with the discovery layer/ tool /product developers and their representatives.Findings. Results show that most of the Indian law libraries are subscribing to bundles of legal information resources such as Hein Online, JSTOR, LexisNexis Academic, Manupatra, Westlaw India, SCC web, AIR Online (CDROM), and so on. International legal and academic resources are compatible with discovery tools because they support various standards related to online publishing and dissemination such as OAI/PMH, Open URL, MARC21, and Z39.50, but Indian legal resources such as Manupatra, Air, and SCC are not compatible with the discovery layers. The central index is one of the important components in a discovery search interface, and discovery layer services/tools could be useful for Indian law libraries also if they can include multiple legal and academic resources in their central index. But present practices and observations reveal that discovery layers are not providing facility to cover legal information resources. Therefore, in the present form, discovery tools are not very useful; they are an incomplete and half solution for Indian libraries because all available Indian legal resources available in the law libraries are not covered.Originality/Value. Very limited research or published literature is available in the area of discovery layers and their compatibility with legal information resources.
Information retrieval; Discovery tools; Academic law libraries India;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Balaji Babu, P., & Krishnamurthy, M. (2013). Library automation to resource discovery: A review of emerging challenges. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 433–451.   DOI
2 Bharathy, J., Vastrad, G., & Kumar, P. D. (2011). Federated search and discovery tools. Retrieved from
3 Bing, J. (2010). Let there be lite: A brief history of legal information retrieval. European Journal of Law and Technology, 1(1). Retrieved from
4 Breeding, M. (2010). Library technology guides: Discovery products. Retrieved from
5 Breeding, M. (2015). The future of library resource discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee. NISO.
6 Campbell, D. (2010). Library discovery services - A better way to find what you're looking for. Retrieved from
7 Caplan, P. (2012). On discovery tools, OPACs and the motion of library language. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 108–115.   DOI
8 Chickering, F. W., & Yang, S. Q. (2014). Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: An update. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2), 5-30.   DOI
9 Craigle, V. (2011). Discovery layers in law libraries. AALL Spectrum, 7. Retrieved from
10 Das, A. K. (2015). Information retrieval and search process in web-scale discovery tools. E-Library Science Research Journal, 3(8). Retrieved from
11 Exploring usability enhancements in W3C Process - slide "Usability - ISO 9241 definition" (n.d.). Retrieved May 6, 2016, from
12 Gross, J. M., & Sheridan, L. L. (2011). Web scale discovery: The user experience. New Library World, 112(5/6), 236-247.   DOI
13 Georgas, H. (2013). Google vs. the library: Student preferences and perceptions when doing research using Google and a federated search tool. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2), 165–185.   DOI
14 Gibson, I., Goddard, L., & Gordon, S. (2009). One box to search them all: Implementing federated search at an academic library. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 118-133.   DOI
15 Goodsett, M. (2014). Discovery search tools: A comparative study. Reference Reviews, 28(6), 2–8.   DOI
16 Hoeppner, A. (2012). The ins and outs of evaluating web-scale discovery services. Computers in Libraries, 32(3), 6.
17 Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2012). "Discovering" what's changed: A revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 253-274.   DOI
18 Levor, R. (2004). The unique role of academic law libraries. Marketing Toolkit Task Force, AALL Academic Law Libraries Special Interest Section's Marketing Toolkit for Academic Law Libraries. Retrieved from
19 NISO ODI (2014). Open Discovery Initiative - National Information Standards Organization. Retrieved from
20 Pinkas, M. M., Baglivo, M. D., Klein, I. R., Brown, E., Harris, R., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Selecting and implementing a discovery tool: The University of Maryland Health Sciences and Human Services Library experience. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(1), 1–12.   DOI
21 Rai, P. (n. d.). Access to Indian legal information in digital environment: A comparative study of electronic commercial databases and public domain resources in law. Retrieved from
22 Pope, B. M. (2009). NELLCO's universal search solution: A report on a NASIG 2009 conference session. Collaborative Librarianship 1(4), 148-150.
23 Principles of website usability | 5 key principles of good website usability (2013, March 26). Retrieved from
24 Products & Services | CARLI (n. d.). Retrieved March 8, 2016, from
25 Saha, T. K. (2010). Textbook on legal methods, legal systems & research. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing. Retrieved from,+Legal+Systems+%26+Research&ots=z0Iu69D8Q3&sig=w2KBHAPDXINxkbcXQDAGFqIuoE0.
26 Shapiro, S. D. (2014). Discovery tools as electronic billboards to market your library. Library Hi Tech News, 31(10), 10–12.   DOI
27 Shrivastava, R. K., Srivastava, M., Khare, B. B., & Pai, G. (2012). Computer assisted legal research with special reference to Indian legal contents: Retrospect and prospect. In R. Singh, S. D. Rao, P. Rai, & A. Singh (Eds.), Access to legal information & research in digital age (p. 49). New Delhi: NLUD. Retrieved from
28 Sloan, A. E. (2009). Basic legal research: Tools and strategies (4th ed). New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; Aspen Publishers.
29 Software selection methodology for library discovery layer systems (n. d.). Retrieved July 14, 2015, from
30 Thanuskodi, S. (2009). Information-seeking behavior of law faculty at Central Law College, Salem. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from
31 The Bar Council of India. (2008). Education Rules 2008. Delhi: The Bar Council of India. Retrieved from
32 Theresa, A. U., & Jerome, I. O. (2010). The role of digital library in law research. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(6), 108–113.
33 Tredwell, S. (2013, November 6). The problem with discovery tools and law firm libraries - Slaw. Slaw Canada's Online Legal Magazine. Retrieved from
34 Usable (n. d.). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved May 6, 2016, from
35 VuFind - Search. Discover. Share. (2015). Retrieved August 7, 2015, from
36 Yang, S. Q., & Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: How close are we towards next generation catalog? Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 690–709.   DOI
37 Zhang, T. (2013). User-centered evaluation of a discovery layer system with Google Scholar. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability. Web, mobile, and product design (pp. 313-322). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from