1 |
Balaji Babu, P., & Krishnamurthy, M. (2013). Library automation to resource discovery: A review of emerging challenges. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 433–451.
DOI
|
2 |
Bharathy, J., Vastrad, G., & Kumar, P. D. (2011). Federated search and discovery tools. Retrieved from http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/1944/1599.
|
3 |
Bing, J. (2010). Let there be lite: A brief history of legal information retrieval. European Journal of Law and Technology, 1(1). Retrieved from http://ejlt.org/article/view/15.
|
4 |
Breeding, M. (2010). Library technology guides: Discovery products. Retrieved from http://librarytechnology.org/discovery.
|
5 |
Breeding, M. (2015). The future of library resource discovery: A white paper commissioned by the NISO Discovery to Delivery (D2D) Topic Committee. NISO.
|
6 |
Campbell, D. (2010). Library discovery services - A better way to find what you're looking for. Retrieved from http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2010/12/22/library-discovery-services-a-better-way-to-find-what-youre-looking-for.
|
7 |
Caplan, P. (2012). On discovery tools, OPACs and the motion of library language. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 108–115.
DOI
|
8 |
Chickering, F. W., & Yang, S. Q. (2014). Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: An update. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2), 5-30. http://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i2.3471.
DOI
|
9 |
Craigle, V. (2011). Discovery layers in law libraries. AALL Spectrum, 7. Retrieved from http://www.aallnet.org/mm/Publications/spectrum/archives/Vol-16/No-3/discovery-layers.pdf.
|
10 |
Das, A. K. (2015). Information retrieval and search process in web-scale discovery tools. E-Library Science Research Journal, 3(8). Retrieved from http://www.lsrj.in/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=501.
|
11 |
Exploring usability enhancements in W3C Process - slide "Usability - ISO 9241 definition" (n.d.). Retrieved May 6, 2016, from https://www.w3.org/2002/Talks/0104-usabilityprocess/slide3-0.html.
|
12 |
Gross, J. M., & Sheridan, L. L. (2011). Web scale discovery: The user experience. New Library World, 112(5/6), 236-247. http://doi.org/10.1108/03074801111136275.
DOI
|
13 |
Georgas, H. (2013). Google vs. the library: Student preferences and perceptions when doing research using Google and a federated search tool. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(2), 165–185.
DOI
|
14 |
Gibson, I., Goddard, L., & Gordon, S. (2009). One box to search them all: Implementing federated search at an academic library. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 118-133. http://doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942973.
DOI
|
15 |
Goodsett, M. (2014). Discovery search tools: A comparative study. Reference Reviews, 28(6), 2–8.
DOI
|
16 |
Hoeppner, A. (2012). The ins and outs of evaluating web-scale discovery services. Computers in Libraries, 32(3), 6.
|
17 |
Hofmann, M. A., & Yang, S. Q. (2012). "Discovering" what's changed: A revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 253-274.
DOI
|
18 |
Levor, R. (2004). The unique role of academic law libraries. Marketing Toolkit Task Force, AALL Academic Law Libraries Special Interest Section's Marketing Toolkit for Academic Law Libraries. Retrieved from http://eduscapes.com/marketing/articles/unique_role.pdf.
|
19 |
NISO ODI (2014). Open Discovery Initiative - National Information Standards Organization. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/workrooms/odi.
|
20 |
Pinkas, M. M., Baglivo, M. D., Klein, I. R., Brown, E., Harris, R., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Selecting and implementing a discovery tool: The University of Maryland Health Sciences and Human Services Library experience. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(1), 1–12.
DOI
|
21 |
Rai, P. (n. d.). Access to Indian legal information in digital environment: A comparative study of electronic commercial databases and public domain resources in law. Retrieved from www.aallnet.org/gmnode/41427.aspx.
|
22 |
Pope, B. M. (2009). NELLCO's universal search solution: A report on a NASIG 2009 conference session. Collaborative Librarianship 1(4), 148-150.
|
23 |
Principles of website usability | 5 key principles of good website usability (2013, March 26). Retrieved from https://blog.crazyegg.com/2013/03/26/principles-website-usability.
|
24 |
Products & Services | CARLI (n. d.). Retrieved March 8, 2016, from http://www.carli.illinois.edu/products-services.
|
25 |
Saha, T. K. (2010). Textbook on legal methods, legal systems & research. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing. Retrieved from http://books.google.co.in/bookshl=en&lr=&id=cOUpZcAfZWoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Textbook+on+Legal+Methods,+Legal+Systems+%26+Research&ots=z0Iu69D8Q3&sig=w2KBHAPDXINxkbcXQDAGFqIuoE0.
|
26 |
Shapiro, S. D. (2014). Discovery tools as electronic billboards to market your library. Library Hi Tech News, 31(10), 10–12.
DOI
|
27 |
Shrivastava, R. K., Srivastava, M., Khare, B. B., & Pai, G. (2012). Computer assisted legal research with special reference to Indian legal contents: Retrospect and prospect. In R. Singh, S. D. Rao, P. Rai, & A. Singh (Eds.), Access to legal information & research in digital age (p. 49). New Delhi: NLUD. Retrieved from http://www.nludelhi.ac.in/download/publication/2015/Access%20to%20LEgal%20Informationa%20and%20Research%20in%20Digital%20Age.pdf#page=56.
|
28 |
Sloan, A. E. (2009). Basic legal research: Tools and strategies (4th ed). New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; Aspen Publishers.
|
29 |
Software selection methodology for library discovery layer systems (n. d.). Retrieved July 14, 2015, from https://foss4lib.org/book/export/html/4779.
|
30 |
Thanuskodi, S. (2009). Information-seeking behavior of law faculty at Central Law College, Salem. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/282.
|
31 |
The Bar Council of India. (2008). Education Rules 2008. Delhi: The Bar Council of India. Retrieved from http://www.barcouncilofindia.org/about/legal-education/education-rules-2008.
|
32 |
Theresa, A. U., & Jerome, I. O. (2010). The role of digital library in law research. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(6), 108–113.
|
33 |
Tredwell, S. (2013, November 6). The problem with discovery tools and law firm libraries - Slaw. Slaw Canada's Online Legal Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.slaw.ca/2013/11/06/the-problem-with-discovery-tools-and-law-firm-libraries.
|
34 |
Usable (n. d.). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved May 6, 2016, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/usable.
|
35 |
VuFind - Search. Discover. Share. (2015). Retrieved August 7, 2015, from http://vufind-org.github.io/vufind.
|
36 |
Yang, S. Q., & Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: How close are we towards next generation catalog? Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 690–709.
DOI
|
37 |
Zhang, T. (2013). User-centered evaluation of a discovery layer system with Google Scholar. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability. Web, mobile, and product design (pp. 313-322). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39253-5_34.
|