1 |
Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42(4), 422-448.
DOI
|
2 |
Asadi, S., & Moradi, F. (2014). Correlation between industrial indicators and distribution of scientific wealth in Iran (2004-2008). JIPM, 30(4), 901-922. Text in Persian.
|
3 |
Belew, R. (2005). Scientific impact quantity and quality: Analysis of two sources of bibliographic data. Arxiv. IR/0504036.
|
4 |
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Which cities’ paper output and citation impact are above expectation in information science? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 336-345.
DOI
|
5 |
Frame, D.J. (1985). Problems in the use of literature-based S&T indicators in developing countries. In H. Morita-Lou (Ed.), Science and technology indicators for development (pp. 117-122). Boulder: Westview.
|
6 |
Frame, D.J., Narin, F., & Carpenter, M.P. (1977). The distribution of world science. Social Studies of Science, 7, 501-516.
DOI
|
7 |
Garfield, E. (1983). Mapping science in the third world. Science and Public Policy, 10(3), 112-127.
DOI
|
8 |
Glanzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific contribution of the European Union (1985-1992). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185-202.
DOI
|
9 |
Grupp, H., & Mogee, M.E. (2005). Indicators for national science and technology policy: Their development, use, and possible misuse. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 75-94). New York: Kluwer.
|
10 |
Guerrero-Botea, V.P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6, 674-688.
DOI
|
11 |
Inhaber, H. &, Alvo, M. (1978). World science as an input-output system. Scientometrics, 1(1), 48-51.
|
12 |
International Comparisons of R&D Performance (2014). In Science and engineering indicators 2014. Chapter 4. Research and development: National trends and international comparisons. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/chapter-4/chapter-4.pdf.
|
13 |
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2012). Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 318-332.
DOI
|
14 |
King, D.A. (2004, July 15). The science impact of nations: What difference countries get for their research spending? Nature, 430, 311-315.
DOI
|
15 |
Lebeau, L.M. et al. (2008). The effect of university-industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications: The Canadian case (1980-2005). Research Evaluation, 17(3), 227-232.
DOI
|
16 |
Leydesdorff, L., & Persson, O. (2010). Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1622–1634.
DOI
|
17 |
May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275, 793.
DOI
|
18 |
Moravcsik, M.J. (1985). Science in the developing countries: An unexplored and fruitful area for research in science studies. Journal of the Society for Social Studies of Science, 3(3), 2-13.
|
19 |
National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering indicators 2012. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/at.pdf.
|
20 |
OECD (2011). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011. Highlights. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/scienceandtechnologypolicy/48712591.pdf.
|
21 |
Okubo Y., & Zitt M. (2004). Searching for research integration across Europe: A closer look at international and inter-regional collaboration in France. Science and Public, 31(3), 213-226.
DOI
|
22 |
Olmeda-Gómez, C. et al. (2009). Visualization of scientific co-authorship in Spanish universities: From regionalization to internationalization. Aslib Proceedings, 61(1), 83-100.
DOI
|
23 |
Poddly, I. (2005). Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics, 64(1), 95–99.
DOI
|
24 |
Osareh, F., & Wilson, C.S. (2000). Collaboration in Iranian scientific publication. LIBRI: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, 52, 88-98.
|
25 |
Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. PNAS, 105(45), 17268-17272.
DOI
|
26 |
PMO (2003). Outlook of I.R. Iran in 1404 A.H. horizon. No.101/193000. English version available at: http://intl.irannsr.org/services/nsr_content/17195-Irans-2025-vision.html
|
27 |
Ponds, R., Oorta, F.V., & Frenkena, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423-444.
DOI
|
28 |
Sanders, R. (1987). The Pareto principle: Its use and abuse. Journal of Services Marketing, 1(2), 37-40.
DOI
|
29 |
Shrum, W. (1997). View from a far: Visible productivity of scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics, 40(2), 215-35.
DOI
|
30 |
Thomson Reuters (2012). ScholarOne Manuscripts report, Global Publishing: Changes in submission trends and the impact on scholarly publishers. Retrieved from http://legalcurrent.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/SSR-Global-Sub-infographic-Color.pdf.
|
31 |
U.S. Census Bureau (2011). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2011. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/11statab/science.pdf.
|
32 |
UNESCO (2010). UNESCO Science Report 2010: The current status of science around the world. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001899/189958e.pdf.
|