Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.2008.4.4.159

Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children  

Han, Jeong-Hye (Department of Computer Education, Cheongju Nat'l University of Education)
Jo, Mi-Heon (Department of Computer Education, Cheongju Nat'l University of Education)
Jones, Vicki (School of Information Technology, Griffith University)
Jo, Jun-H. (School of Information Technology, Griffith University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Processing Systems / v.4, no.4, 2008 , pp. 159-168 More about this Journal
Abstract
Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), based on already well-researched Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), has been under vigorous scrutiny since recent developments in robot technology. Robots may be more successful in establishing common ground in project-based education or foreign language learning for children than in traditional media. Backed by its strong IT environment and advances in robot technology, Korea has developed the world's first available e-Learning home robot. This has demonstrated the potential for robots to be used as a new educational media - robot-learning, referred to as 'r-Learning'. Robot technology is expected to become more interactive and user-friendly than computers. Also, robots can exhibit various forms of communication such as gestures, motions and facial expressions. This study compared the effects of non-computer based (NCB) media (using a book with audiotape) and Web-Based Instruction (WBI), with the effects of Home Robot-Assisted Learning (HRL) for children. The robot gestured and spoke in English, and children could touch its monitor if it did not recognize their voice command. Compared to other learning programs, the HRL was superior in promoting and improving children's concentration, interest, and academic achievement. In addition, the children felt that a home robot was friendlier than other types of instructional media. The HRL group had longer concentration spans than the other groups, and the p-value demonstrated a significant difference in concentration among the groups. In regard to the children's interest in learning, the HRL group showed the highest level of interest, the NCB group and the WBI group came next in order. Also, academic achievement was the highest in the HRL group, followed by the WBI group and the NCB group respectively. However, a significant difference was also found in the children's academic achievement among the groups. These results suggest that home robots are more effective as regards children's learning concentration, learning interest and academic achievement than other types of instructional media (such as: books with audiotape and WBI) for English as a foreign language.
Keywords
Human-Computer Interaction; Human-Robot Interaction; e-Learning; Educational Media; r-Learning; Web-Based Instruction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Bauer, C., 2001, Collaboration, Dialogue, and Human-Robot Interaction, The 10th International Symposium of Robotics Research, November, Lorne, Victoria, Australia
2 Han, J., Jo, M., Park, S. and Kim, S., 2005, The Educational Use of Home Robots for Children, Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop, Publication Date: 13-15, pp.378-383, Aug. 2005   DOI
3 Han, J. and Kim D., Field Trial on Robots as Teaching Assistants and Peer Tutors for children, Proceeding of Asia Pacific International Symposium on Information Technology, KIPS, IEEE, 2006.01
4 Han, J., Cho H., Kim S., Jeong K., The Development of the English Learning Contents Embeded Self-Disclosure Activities in Ubiquitous Home Robots, Proceeding of Asia Pacific International Symposium on Information Technology, KIPS, IEEE, p603-606, 2007.01
5 Kiesler, S. and Hinds, P., 2004, Introduction to This Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol.19, 1-8   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Scholtz, J. and Bahrami, S., 2004, Human-Robot Interaction: Development of an Evaluation Methodology for the Bystander Role of Interaction, Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.4, 3212- 3217
7 Barron, A.E. and Ivers, K.S., 1998, The Internet and Instruction: Activities and Ideas. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
8 Shin, K.C., 2004, Introduction of Home Robot IROBI, Proceeding of 1st ITRC-IRRC International Workshop on Ubiquitous Robot, KAIST Intelligent Robot Research Center, 121-130
9 Thrun, S. 2004, Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, 9-24   DOI   ScienceOn
10 World Technology Evaluation Center [WTEC] Inc. (2006) International Assessment of Research and Development in Robotics: Final Report, January 2006 [http://www.wtec.org/robotics/report/screen-robotics-finalreport.pdf]
11 Beer, R., 1997, The dynamics of adaptive behavior: a research program, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol 20, No. 2, June 1997, pp.257–289   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Beer, R., Chiel, H., and Drushel R., 1999, Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering, Communications of the ACM, Vol.42, No.5, 85-92   DOI
13 Bushnell L. G. and Crick, A. P. 2003, Control education via autonomous robotics, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Maui, Hawaii), December 2003
14 Conrad, R.M. and Donaldson, J.A., 2004, Engaging the online learner: activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15 Ochanomizu University and NEC, 2001, 'How should we look at robots?' retrieved from http://www.nec.co.jp/robot/english/robotcenter_e.html
16 Kohlhepp J., 2003, Robot teaches healthy lesson to school kids State agency sponsors more than 500 shows throughout New Jersey, http://nbs.gmnews.com/
17 Malec, J., 2001, Some Thoughts on Robotics for Education, Proceeding of American Association for Artificial Intelligence Symposium on Robotics and Education, Standford University
18 Norman, D., 1986, User-centered Design:New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Engineering in Donald Norman and Stephen Draper(Eds.), Erlbaum Associates:Hillsdale, N.J, 31-62
19 Price, B.A., Richards M., Petre M., Hirst A. and Johnson J., 2003, Developing robotics e-teaching for teamwork, International Journal of Engineering Eduation and Lifelong Learning, Inderscience Enterprise, vol. 13, No.1/2, 190-205
20 Scholtz, J., 2003, Theory and Evaluation of Human Robot Interactions, Proceeding of Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 36, Jan   DOI
21 Nickels K. and Giolma J.P., 2000, Using Robots to Teach Non-engineers about Science and Technology, Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education-Gulf-Southwest Annal Meeting, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Session 1234
22 Hirst, A. J., Johnson, J., Petre, M, Price, B. A. and Richards, M., 2002, What is the Best Environment-Language for Teaching Robotics Using Lego Mindstorms? Proceedings of The Seventh International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB-7), Beppu, Oita, Japan, Sugisaka, M. Tanaka, H. (eds.) Journal Artificial Life and Robotics, Issue Vol.7, No.3, pp.124-131, September, 2003   DOI
23 Clark, R.V. and Mayer, R.E., 2003, e-Learning and the Science of Instruction, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24 Fumihide, T., Cicourel, A. and Movellan, J. R., 2007, Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.104 No.46, November, 13, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H., 2004, Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children:A Field Trial, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 19, 61-84   DOI   ScienceOn