Browse > Article

A Study on Asymmetric Lifting Capacity Due to Spine Deformity  

Oh, Hyunsoo (Department of Safety Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Chang, Seong Rok (Department of Safety Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Safety / v.11, no.1, 2012 , pp. 22-25 More about this Journal
Abstract
Scoliosis can be biomechanically described as a three dimensional deformity of the spine, with deviations from the physiologic curves in the sagittal and frontal planes, usually combined with intervertebral rotation. Various factors are suspected such as genetic defects, uneven growth of the vertebrae, hormonal effects, abnormal muscular activity, postural problems, or a mix of some of these elements, but its initial cause is known in only 15-20% cases. The screening test for diagnosing scoliosis is called the Adams Forward Bend Test. During the experiment, the subjects were asked to bend over, with arms dangling, until a curve could be observed. The Scoliometer was placed on the back of the subjects and used to measure the difference between the left and right apex of the curve in the thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar area. Then, the subjects were asked to perform Maximum Voluntary Contractions (MVCs) using the digital back muscle dynamometer in three different postures: (1) 0o (sagittally symmetric); (2) 30o from the mid-sagittal plane (clockwise); and (3) 30o from the mid-sagittal plane (counterclockwise). In addition to the experimental data, subject-dependent variables including Body Mass Index (BMI), percentage of body fat and muscle mass of left/right arms and legs were employed to reveal the cause of difference among three MVC conditions. All those variables were tested using statistical methods.
Keywords
asymmetric lifting capacity; dynamometer; maximum voluntary contractions; scoliometer; scoliosis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 G. Zoabli, P.A. Mathieu and C. Aubin, "Back Muscles Biometry in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis", The Spine Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 338-344, 2007.   DOI
2 V.N. Cassar-Pullicino and S.M. Eisenstein, "Imaging in Scoliosis: What, Why and How?", Clin Radiol, Vol. 57, pp. 543-562, 2002.   DOI
3 W.E. Stehbens, "Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Scoliosis Revisited", Exp Mol Pathol, Vol. 74, pp. 49-60, 2003.   DOI
4 R.G. Burwell, "Aetiology of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Current Concepts", Pediatr Rehabil, Vol. 6, pp. 137-170, 2003.   DOI
5 I.D. Detchev, "Implementation of a Close Range Photogrammetric System for 3d Reconstruction of a Scoliotic Torso", MSc Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, 2010.
6 W. Adams, "Lectures on the Pathology and Treatment of Lateral and Other Forms of Curvature of the Spine", London: J & A Churchill & Sons, 1882.
7 W.P. Bunnell, "An objective criterion for scoliosis screening", Journal of bone and joint surgery, Vol. 66, pp. 1381-1387, 1984.   DOI
8 W.P. Bunnell, "Outcome of spinal screening", Spine, Vol. 18, pp. 1572-1580, 1993.   DOI
9 J.R. Cobb, "Outline for the study of scoliosis, instructional course lectures", American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol. 5, pp. 261-275, 1948.
10 W.J. Kane, "Scoliosis Prevalence: A Call for a Statement of Terms", Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 126, pp. 43-46, 1977.
11 P.D.C. Cote, B.G. Kreitz, J.D. Cassidy, A.K. Dzus and J. Martel, "A Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's Forward Bend Test", Spine, Vol. 23, pp. 796-802, 1998.   DOI
12 L.E. Amendt, K.L. Ause-Ellias, J.L. Eybers, C.T. Wadsworth, D.H. Nielsen and S.L. Weinstein, "Validity and reliability testing of the $Scoliometer^{(R)}$", Physical Therapy, Vol. 70, pp. 108-117, 1990   DOI
13 T.B. Grivas, E.S. Vasiliadis, G. Koufopoulos, D. Segos, G. Triantafyllopoulos and V. Mouzakis, "Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents", Scoliosis, Vol. 1, pp. 19-26, 2006.   DOI
14 M.P. Meier, M.P. Klein, D. Krebs, D. Grob and M. Muntener, "Fiber Transformations in Multifidus Muscle of Young Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis", Spine, Vol. 22, pp. 2357-2364, 1997.   DOI