Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2017.34.1.6

Dissolution of degummed Antheraea yamamai silkworm cocoon  

Jo, You-Young (Sericultural and Apicultural Materials Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Bae, Sung Min (Sericultural and Apicultural Materials Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Kweon, HaeYong (Sericultural and Apicultural Materials Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA)
Publication Information
International Journal of Industrial Entomology and Biomaterials / v.34, no.1, 2017 , pp. 6-10 More about this Journal
Abstract
Dissolution of Antheraea yamamai silkworm cocoon was carried out in various solvent systems with various dissolving conditions including dissolution salts, salt concentration, dissolving temperature, and time. General chaotropic salt for Bombyx mori silk fibroin does not work for A. yamamai silkworm cocoon. Lithium bromide 9.3 M at $100^{\circ}C$ also does not work to dissolve wild silkworm cocoon. However, 9 M of lithium thiocyanate treatment at $100^{\circ}C$ induced 100% dissolution of wild silkworm cocoon. But it could not be dissolved lower than $60^{\circ}C$. Like lithium thiocyanate, less than $60^{\circ}C$ treatment with molten calcium nitrate 4 hydrate could not dissolve wild silkworm cocoon. As the dissolution temperature increased up to $100^{\circ}C$, the solubility of wild one was reached over 90%. SDS-PAGE showed broad tailing stream pattern that means the molecule of wild silk was depolymerized with dissolution temperature and time. From the above results, the best chaotropic salt for A.yamamai silkworm cocoon is calcium nitrate 4 hydrate.
Keywords
Antheraea yamamai silk; Dissolution; Calcium nitrate; Molecular weight degradation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim SK, Jo YY, Lee KG, Lee HS, Yeo JH, Kweon HY (2014) Preparation and characterization of silk beads for protein delivery system. Int J Indust Entomol 28, 66-70.   DOI
2 Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, Wang X. (2013) Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65, 457-470.   DOI
3 Kweon HY, Yeo JH, Kim KY, Kim YS, Song HS, Kim SJ, Woo SO, Han SM, Lee KG (2009) Characteristics of silk sericin extracted from sericinjam. Int J Indust Entomol 18, 121-124.
4 Kweon HY, Lee KG, Yeo JH, Park YH (2003) Dissolution of Antheraea pernyi silk fiber and structure of regenerated fibroin from zinc nitrate solution. Korean J Seric Sci 45, 121-125.
5 Kweon HY, Park YH (2001) Dissolution and characterization of regenerated Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin. J Appl Polym Sci 82, 750-758.   DOI
6 Kweon HY (1998) Structural characteristics of Anthereae pernyi silk fibroin film regenerated from calcium nitrate solution. Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.
7 Kweon HY, Park YH (1994) Structural characteristics and physical properties of wild silk fibers; Antheraea pernyi and Antheraea yamamai. Korean J Seric Sci 36, 138-146.
8 Lammli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685.   DOI
9 Lee KG, Chung DE, Kim KY, Jo YY, Kim HB, Kim SK, Kweon HY (2015) General characteristics of Antheraea yamamai silkworm cocoon cultured in Korea. J Seric Entomol Sci 53, 6-11.
10 Lee KG, Jo YY, Yeo JH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Park KY, Kweon HY (2013) Dissolution of Antheraea pernyi raw silk with calcium nitrate ethanol solution. J Seric Entomol Sci 51, 15-19.
11 Aramwit P, Sangcakul A (2007) The effects of sericin cream on wound healing in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71, 2473-2477.   DOI
12 Cheng GT, Wang X, Tao SJ, Xia J, Xu S (2015) Differences in regenerated silk fibroin prepared with different solvent systems: from structure to conformational changes. J Appl Polym Sci 132, 41959.
13 Ju WT, Kim KY, Sung GB, Kim YS (2014) Quantitative analysis of 1-Deoxynojirimycin content using silkworm genetic resources. Int J Indust Entomol 29(2), 162-168.   DOI
14 Liu Y, Zhang Y (2014) Control of the gelation process of silk fibroin solution. Therm Sci 18, 1587-1590.   DOI
15 Kim J, Kim CH, Park CH, Seo JN, Kweon HY, Kang SW, Lee KG (2010) Comparison of methods for the repair of acute tympanic membrane perforations: Silk patch vs. Paper patch. Wound Rep Regen 18, 132-138.   DOI
16 Kim JH, Shin BS, Lee KG, Yeo JH, Kweon HY (2009) Sericinjam sericin: structural and thermal properties. Int J Indust Entomol 19, 255-258.
17 Kim SJ, Um IC (2016) Storage stability of silk solution for viscosity and electrospinnability. Int J Indust Entomol 33, 138-143.   DOI
18 Minoura N, Tsukada M, Nagura M (1990) Fine structure and oxygen permeability of silk fibroin membrane treated with methanol. Polymer 31, 265-269.   DOI
19 Minoura N, Aiba SI, Higuchi M, Gotoh Y, Tsukada M, Imai Y (1995) Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on silk fibroin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 208, 511-516.   DOI
20 Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD (1986) Arg-Gly-Asp: a versatile cell recognition signal, Cell 44, 517-518.   DOI
21 Shin BS, Jeon JY, Kim JH (2012) Cocoon characteristics of Antheraea pernyi silkworm reared in Korean oak field. Int J Ind Entomol 25, 205-208.
22 Shin BS, Jeon JY, Kim JH (2015) Degumming of Antheraea yamamai silkworm cocoon. Int J Ind Entomol 31, 127-131.
23 Tsukada M, Freddi G, Gotoh Y, Kasai N (1994) Physical and chemical properties of tussah silk fibroin film. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 32, 1407-1412.   DOI
24 Vepari C, Kaplan DL (2007) Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 32, 991-1007.   DOI
25 Sakabe H, Itoh H, Miyamoto T, Nishiki Y, Ha WS (1989) In vivo blood compatibility of regenerated silk fibroin. Sen-I Gakkaishi 45, 487-490.   DOI
26 Wang J, Yi H, Wei Y (2011) Preliminary biocompatibility evaluation of regenerated Antheraea yamamai silk fibroin in vitro. J Wuhan Univ Tech Mater Sci Ed 26, 1044-1048.   DOI
27 Wei Y, Sun D, Yi H, Wang J (2014) Chracterization of a PEG-DE crosslinked tubular silk scaffold. Text Res J 84, 959-967.   DOI
28 You R, Xu Y, Liu Y, Li X, Li M (2014) Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro degradations of silk fibroin scaffolds from mulberry and nonmulberry silkworms. Biomed Mater 10, 015003.   DOI