Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.423

Numerical study of fluid behavior on protruding shapes within the inlet part of pressurized membrane module using computational fluid dynamics  

Choi, Changkyoo (Water Convergence Research Team, Deptartment of Water Industry Promotion, Korea Water Cluster, Korea Environment Corporation)
Lee, Chulmin (Global Desalination Research Center (GDRC), School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju institute of Science and Technology (GIST))
Park, No-Suk (Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University)
Kim, In S. (Global Desalination Research Center (GDRC), School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju institute of Science and Technology (GIST))
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.25, no.4, 2020 , pp. 498-505 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzes the velocity and pressure incurred by protruding shapes installed within the inlet part of a pressurized membrane module during operation to determine the fluid flow distribution. In this paper, to find the flow distribution within a module, it investigates the velocity and pressure values at cross-sectional and outlet planes, and 9 sections classified on outlet plane using computational fluid dynamics. From the Reynolds number (Re), the fluid flow was estimated to be turbulent when the Re exceeded 4,000. In the vertical cross-sectional plane, shape 4 and 6 (round-type protrusion) showed the relatively high velocity of 0.535 m/s and 0.558 m/s, respectively, indicating a uniform flow distribution. From the velocity and pressure at the outlet, shape 4 also displayed a relatively uniform fluid velocity and pressure, indicating that fluid from the inlet rapidly and uniformly reached the outlet, however, from detailed data of velocity, pressure and flowrate obtained from 9 sections at the outlet, shape 6 revealed the low standard deviations for each section. Therefore, shape 6 was deemed to induce the ideal flow, since it maintained a uniform pressure, velocity and flowrate distribution.
Keywords
Computational fluid dynamics; Fluid pressure; Fluid velocity; Pressurized membrane module design; Protruding shapes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Verissimo S, Peinemann KV, Bordado J. New composite hollow fiber membrane for nanofiltration. Desalination 2005;184:1-11.   DOI
2 Ghidossi R, Daurelle JV, Veyret D, Moulin P. Simplified CFD approach of a hollow fiber ultrafiltration system. Chem. Eng. J. 2006;123:117-125.   DOI
3 Liu Y, He G, Liu X, Xiao G, Li B. CFD simulations of turbulent flow in baffle-filled membrane tubes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009;67:14-20.   DOI
4 Ghidossi R, Veyret D, Moulin P. Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes: state of the art and opportunities. Chem. Eng. Proc. 2006;45:437-454.   DOI
5 Zare M, Ashtiani FZ, Fouladitajar A. CFD modeling and simulation of concentration polarization in microfiltration of oil-water emulsions; Application of an Eulerian multiphase model. Desalination 2013;324:37-47.   DOI
6 Keir G, Jegatheesan V. A review of computational fluid dynamics applications in pressure-driven membrane filtration. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014;13:183-201.   DOI
7 Vinther F, Jonsson AS. Modelling of optimal back-shock frequency in hollow fibre ultrafiltration membranes I:Computational fluid dynamics. J. Membr. Sci. 2016;506:130-136.   DOI
8 Munson BR, Young DF, Okiishi TH. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.
9 Santos JLC, Geraldes V, Velizarov S, Crespo JG. Investigation of flow patterns and mass transfer in membrane module channels filled with flow-aligned spacers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Membr. Sci. 2007;305:103-117.   DOI
10 Ahmed S, Seraji MT, Jahedi J, Hashib MA. Application of CFD for simulation of a baffled tubular membrane. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012;90:600-608.   DOI
11 Shakaib M, Hasani SMF, Mahmood M. CFD modeling for flow and mass transfer in spacer-obstructed membrane feed channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2009;326:270-284.   DOI
12 Ahmed S, Seraji MT, Jahedi J, Hashib MA. CFD simulation of turbulence promoters in a tubular membrane channel. Desalination 2011;276:191-198.   DOI
13 Zhuang L, Guo H, Dai G, Xu Z. Effect of the inlet manifold on the performance of a hollow fiber membrane module-A CFD study. J. Membr. Sci. 2017;526:73-93.   DOI
14 Liang YY, Chapman MB, Fimbres-Weihs GA, Wiley DE. CFD modelling of electro-osmotic permeate flux enhancement on the feed side of a membrane module. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;470:378-388.   DOI
15 Vinther F, Pinelo M, Brons M, Jonsson G, Meyer AS. Predicting optimal back-shock times in ultrafiltration hollow fiber modules II: Effect of inlet flow and concentration dependent viscosity. J. Membr. Sci. 2015;493:486-495.   DOI
16 Sharma C, Malhotra D, Rathore AS. Review of computational fluid dynamics applications in biotechnology processes. Biotechnol. Prog. 2011;27:1497-1510.   DOI
17 Oh JI, Choi JW, Lim JL, Kim DI, Park NS. A study on hydraulic modifications of low-pressure membrane inlet structure with CFD and PIV techniques. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng. 2015;37:607-618.   DOI
18 Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume Method. United Kingdom:Pearson Education Limited; 2007.
19 Kavianipour O, Ingram GD, Vuthaluru HB. Investigation into the effectiveness of feed spacer configurations for reverse osmosis membrane modules using Computational Fluid Dynamics. J. Membr. Sci. 2017;526:156-171.   DOI
20 Wikipedia. K-epsilon turbulence model [Internet]. Wikimedia Foundation Inc. [cited 06 March 2018]. Available from:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-epsilon_turbulence_model.
21 Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng. 1974;3:269-289.   DOI
22 Taesung S&E Korea, CFX manual: Lecture 10 Turbulence:Introduction to ANSYS CFX. Anflux. [cited 07 November 2017]. Available from: https://www.tsne.co.kr/.
23 Monfared MA, Kasiri N, Salahi A, Mohammadi T. CFD simulation of baffles arrangement for gelatin-water ultrafiltration in rectangular channel. Desalination 2012;284:288-296.   DOI