1 |
Abyar H, Younesi H, Bahramifar N, Zinatizadeh AA, Amini M. Kinetic evaluation and process analysis of COD and nitrogen removal in UAASB bioreactor. J. Taiwan Instit. Chem. Eng. 2017;78:272-281.
DOI
|
2 |
Debik E, Coskun T. Use of the Static Granular Bed Reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:2777-2782.
DOI
|
3 |
Faridnasr M, Ghanbari B, Sassani A. Optimization of the moving-bed biofilm sequencing batch reactor (MBSBR) to control aeration time by kinetic computational modeling: simulated sugar-industry wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;208:149-160.
DOI
|
4 |
Kapdan IK. Kinetic analysis of dyestuff and COD removal from synthetic wastewater in an anaerobic packed column reactor. Process Biochem. 2005;40:2545-2550.
DOI
|
5 |
Diamantis V, Aivasidis A. Kinetic analysis and simulation of UASB anaerobic treatment of a synthetic fruit wastewater. Global NEST J. 2010;12:175-180.
DOI
|
6 |
Vital-Jacome M, Buitron G, Moreno-Andrade I, Garcia-Rea V, Thalasso F. Microrespirometric determination of the effectiveness factor and biodegradation kinetics of aerobic granules degrading 4-chlorophenol as the sole carbon source. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016;313:112-121.
DOI
|
7 |
Hu Z-H, Yu H-Q, Yue Z-B, Harada H, Li Y-Y. Kinetic analysis of anaerobic digestion of cattail by rumen microbes in a modified UASB reactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007;37:219-225.
DOI
|
8 |
Bhunia P, Ghangrekar M. Analysis, evaluation, and optimization of kinetic parameters for performance appraisal and design of UASB reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:2132-2140.
DOI
|
9 |
Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Bucchi G, et al. Trichloroethylene aerobic cometabolism by suspended and immobilized butane-growing microbial consortia: A kinetic study. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;144:529-538.
DOI
|
10 |
Hussain A, Dubey SK, Kumar V. Kinetic study for aerobic treatment of phenolic wastewater. Water Resour. Ind. 2015;11:81-90.
DOI
|
11 |
Karkare M, Murthy Z. Kinetic studies on agrochemicals wastewater treatment by aerobic activated sludge process at high MLSS and high speed agitation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012;18:1301-1307.
DOI
|
12 |
Lim J, Vadivelu V. Treatment of agro based industrial wastewater in sequencing batch reactor: Performance evaluation and growth kinetics of aerobic biomass. J. Environ. Manage. 2014;146:217-225.
DOI
|
13 |
Tamrat M, Costa C, Marquez MC. Biological treatment of leachate from solid wastes: Kinetic study and simulation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2012;66:46-51.
DOI
|
14 |
Kincannon DF, Stover EL. Design methodology for fixed film reaction-RBCs and biological towers. In: Civil engineering for practicing and design engineers. New York: Pergamon Press;1982.
|
15 |
Yu H, Wilson F, Tay JH. Kinetic analysis of an anaerobic filter treating soybean wastewater. Water Res. 1998;32:3341-3352.
DOI
|
16 |
Hiep NT, Tuyet LTH, Nga DT, Tuan PD. A research on the performance of down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor treating domestic wastewater. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2018;56:482-492.
DOI
|
17 |
Saleh TA, Tuzen M, Sari A. Polyamide magnetic palygorskite for the simultaneous removal of Hg(II) and methyl mercury;with factorial design analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 2018;211:323-333.
DOI
|
18 |
APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st ed. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation. Washington D.C; 2005. p. 75.
|
19 |
Zhou Z, Shen X, Jiang LM, et al. Modeling of multimode anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic wastewater treatment process at low temperature for process optimization. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;281:644-650.
DOI
|
20 |
Saleh TA, Tuzen M, Sari A. Magnetic activated carbon loaded with tungsten oxide nanoparticles for aluminum removal from waters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017;5: 2853-2860.
DOI
|
21 |
Hassani AH, Borghei SM, Samadyar H, Ghanbari B. Utilization of moving bed biofilm reactor for industrial wastewater treatment containing ethylene glycol: Kinetic and performance study. Environ. Technol. 2014;35:499-507.
DOI
|
22 |
Tuzen M, Sari A, Saleh TA. Response surface optimization, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for effective removal of rhodamine B by magnetic nanocomposite. J. Environ. Manage. 2018;206:170-177.
DOI
|
23 |
Saleh TA. Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: A comparison study. Aqua 2015;64:892-903.
|
24 |
Aqualytic. Determining Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V.; 1994; Berlin.
|
25 |
Alighardashi A, Modanlou M, Shervin J. Performance evaluation of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) treating pulp and paper wastewater in start-up period. Water Prac. Technol. 2015;10:1-9.
DOI
|
26 |
Yang GF, Feng LJ, Wang SF, Yang Q, Xu XY, Zhu L. Performance and enhanced mechanism of a novel bio-diatomite biofilm pretreatment process treating polluted raw water. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;191:271-280.
DOI
|
27 |
Saleh TA. Nanocomposite of carbon nanotubes/silica nanoparticles and their use for adsorption of Pb(II): From surface properties to sorption mechanism. Desal. Water Treat. 2015;57:10730-10744.
DOI
|
28 |
Saleh TA. Simultaneous adsorptive desulfurization of diesel fuel over bimetallic nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;172:2123-2132.
DOI
|
29 |
Dey S, Mukherjee S. Kinetic modeling and factorial design for co-biodegradation of phenol and m-cresol for aerobic batch reactor system. Mater. Today Proc. 2016;3:3450-3460.
DOI
|
30 |
Amin MM, Khiadani MH, Fatehizadeh A, Taheri E. Validation of linear and non-linear kinetic modeling of saline wastewater treatment by sequencing batch reactor with adapted and non-adapted consortiums. Desalination 2014;344:228-235.
DOI
|
31 |
Carboneras B, Villasenor J, Fernandez-Morales FJ. Modelling aerobic biodegradation of atrazine and 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid by mixed-cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;243:1044-1050.
DOI
|
32 |
Metcalf E, Eddy M. Wastewater engineering: Treatment and resource recovery. Vol. 5. New York: Mic Graw-Hill; 2014.
|
33 |
Saleh TA. Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies on Hg(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by silica- multiwall carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015;22:16721-16731.
DOI
|
34 |
Saleh TA, Adio SO, Asif M, Dafalla H. Statistical analysis of phenols adsorption on diethylenetriamine-modified activated carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;182:960-968.
DOI
|
35 |
Javid A, Hassani A, Ghanbari B, Yaghmaeian K. Feasibility of utilizing moving bed biofilm reactor to upgrade and retrofit municipal wastewater treatment plants. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2013;7:963-972.
|
36 |
Yang G, Feng L, Wang S, et al. Potential risk and control strategy of biofilm pretreatment process treating raw water. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;198:456-463.
DOI
|
37 |
Abbas G, Wang L, Li W, Zhang M, Zheng P. Kinetics of nitrogen removal in pilot-scale internal-loop airlift bio-particle reactor for simultaneous partial nitrification and anaerobic ammonia oxidation. Ecol. Eng. 2015;74:356-363.
DOI
|
38 |
Akhbari A, Zinatizadeh A, Mohammadi P, Mansouri Y, Irandoust M, Isa M. Kinetic modeling of carbon and nutrients removal in an integrated rotating biological contactor-activated sludge system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;9:371-378.
DOI
|
39 |
Ni S-Q, Sung S, Yue Q-Y, Gao B-Y. Substrate removal evaluation of granular anammox process in a pilot-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Ecol. Eng. 2012;38:30-36.
DOI
|
40 |
Machdar I, Sekiguchi Y, Sumino H, Ohashi A, Harada H. Combination of a UASB reactor and a curtain type DHS (downflow hanging sponge) reactor as a cost-effective sewage treatment system for developing countries. Water Sci. Technol. 2000;42:83-88.
|
41 |
Mahmoud M, Tawfik A, El-Gohary F. Use of down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor as a promising post-treatment system for municipal wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;168:535-543.
DOI
|
42 |
Tandukar M, Ohashi A, Harada H. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale UASB and DHS system and activated sludge process for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res. 2007;41:2697-2705.
DOI
|
43 |
Tawfik A, El-Gohary F, Ohashi A, Harada H. The influence of physical-chemical and biological factors on the removal of faecal coliform through down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) system treating UASB reactor effluent. Water Res. 2006;40:1877-1883.
DOI
|
44 |
Fleifle A, Tawfik A, Saavedra OC, Elzeir M. Treatment of agricultural drainage water via downflow hanging sponge system for reuse in agriculture. Water Supply 2013;13:403-412.
DOI
|
45 |
Yoochatchaval W, Onodera T, Sumino H, et al. Development of a down-flow hanging sponge reactor for the treatment of low strength sewage. Water Sci. Technol. 2014;70:656-663.
DOI
|
46 |
Tomar S, Gupta SK. Investigating the role of co-substrate-substrate ratio and filter media on the performance of anammox hybrid reactor treating nitrogen rich wastewater. J. Biosci. Bioenerg. 2016;121:310-316.
DOI
|
47 |
Vandith V, Setiyawan A S, Soewondo P, Bophann P. Kinetics of nutrient removal in an on-site domestic wastewater treatment facility. In: MATEC Web of Conferences; 22 January 2018;04004.
|
48 |
Niu Q, Zhang Y, Ma H, He S, Li YY. Reactor kinetics evaluation and performance investigation of a long-term operated UASB-anammox mixed culture process. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016;108:24-33.
DOI
|
49 |
Nomoto N, Ali M, Jayaswal K, et al. Characteristics of DO, organic matter, and ammonium profile for practical-scale DHS reactor under various organic load and temperature conditions. Environ. Technol. 2018;39:907-916.
DOI
|