Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.171

Improved structures of stainless steel current collector increase power generation of microbial fuel cells by decreasing cathodic charge transfer impedance  

Nam, Taehui (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Son, Sunghoon (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Eojn (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Tran, Huong Viet Hoa (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Koo, Bonyoung (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Chai, Hyungwon (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Junhyuk (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Pandit, Soumya (The Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)
Gurung, Anup (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University)
Oh, Sang-Eun (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Eun Jung (Department of Environmental Engineering, Mokpo National University)
Choi, Yonghoon (Department of Electrical Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Jung, Sokhee P. (Department of Environment and Energy Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.23, no.4, 2018 , pp. 383-389 More about this Journal
Abstract
Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an innovative environmental and energy system that converts organic wastewater into electrical energy. For practical implementation of MFC as a wastewater treatment process, a number of limitations need to be overcome. Improving cathodic performance is one of major challenges, and introduction of a current collector can be an easy and practical solution. In this study, three types of current collectors made of stainless steel (SS) were tested in a single-chamber cubic MFC. The three current collectors had different contact areas to the cathode (P $1.0cm^2$; PC $4.3cm^2$; PM $6.5cm^2$) and increasing the contacting area enhanced the power and current generations and coulombic and energy recoveries by mainly decreasing cathodic charge transfer impedance. Application of the SS mesh to the cathode (PM) improved maximum power density, optimum current density and maximum current density by 8.8%, 3.6% and 6.7%, respectively, comparing with P of no SS mesh. The SS mesh decreased cathodic polarization resistance by up to 16%, and cathodic charge transfer impedance by up to 39%, possibly because the SS mesh enhanced electron transport and oxygen reduction reaction. However, application of the SS mesh had little effect on ohmic impedance.
Keywords
Cathode; Current collector; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Microbial fuel cells; Power density; Stainless steel;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Liu H, Ramnarayanan R, Logan BE. Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:2281-2285.   DOI
2 Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE. Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:364-369.   DOI
3 Kim BH, Chang IS, Gadd GM. Challenges in microbial fuel cell development and operation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;76:485-494.   DOI
4 Fan Y, Sharbrough E, Liu H. Quantification of the internal resistance distribution of microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:8101-8107.   DOI
5 Le Bozec N, Compere C, L'Her M, Laouenan A, Costa D, Marcus P. Influence of stainless steel surface treatment on the oxygen reduction reaction in seawater. Corros. Sci. 2001;43:765-786.   DOI
6 Kim YP, Fregonese M, Mazille H, Feron D, Santarini G. Study of oxygen reduction on stainless steel surfaces and its contribution to acoustic emission recorded during corrosion processes. Corros. Sci. 2006;48:3945-3959.   DOI
7 Dumas C, Mollica A, Feron D, Basseguy R, Etcheverry L, Bergel A. Marine microbial fuel cell: Use of stainless steel electrodes as anode and cathode materials. Electrochim. Acta. 2007;53:468-473.   DOI
8 Dong H, Yu H, Wang X, Zhou Q, Feng J. A novel structure of scalable air-cathode without Nafion and Pt by rolling activated carbon and PTFE as catalyst layer in microbial fuel cells. Water Res. 2012;46:5777-5787.   DOI
9 Yuan H, Hou Y, Abu-Reesh IM, Chen J, He Z. Oxygen reduction reaction catalysts used in microbial fuel cells for energy-efficient wastewater treatment: A review. Mater. Horiz. 2016;3:382-401.   DOI
10 Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE. Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure. Electrochem. Commun. 2006;8:489-494.   DOI
11 Logan B, Cheng S, Watson V, Estadt G. Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:3341-3346.   DOI
12 Koo B, Kang H, Nam T, Kim E, Son S, Jung SP. Performance enhancement of a microbial fuel cell by physico-chemical treatments of activated-carbon catalyst of an air cathode. J. Korean Soc. Urban Environ. 2016;16:431-439.
13 Middaugh J, Cheng S, Liu W, Wagner R. How to make cathodes with a diffusion layer for single-chamber microbial fuel cells. 2006.
14 Feng Y, Yang Q, Wang X, Logan BE. Treatment of carbon fiber brush anodes for improving power generation in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2010;195:1841-1844.   DOI
15 Jung S, Oh S-E, Lee J, et al. Impedance and thermodynamic analysis of bioanode, abiotic anode, and riboflavin-amended anode in microbial fuel cells. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012;33:3349-3354.   DOI
16 Logan BE, Wallack MJ, Kim K-Y, He W, Feng Y, Saikaly PE. Assessment of microbial fuel cell configurations and power densities. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015;2:206-214.   DOI
17 Escapa A, San-Martin M, Mateos R, Moran A. Scaling-up of membraneless microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for domestic wastewater treatment: Bottlenecks and limitations. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;180:72-78.   DOI
18 Liu H, Logan BE. Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:4040-4046.   DOI
19 Kang H, Jeong J, Gupta PL, Jung SP. Effects of brush-anode configurations on performance and electrochemistry of microbial fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2017;42:27693-27700.   DOI
20 Nam T, Son S, Koo B, et al. Comparative evaluation of performance and electrochemistry of microbial fuel cells with different anode structures and materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2017;42:27677-27684.   DOI
21 Jung S. Impedance analysis of Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, and their coculture in bioeletrochemical systems. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012;7:11091-11100.
22 Jung S, Mench MM, Regan JM. Impedance characteristics and polarization behavior of a microbial fuel cell in response to short-term changes in medium pH. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:9069-9074.   DOI
23 Jung S, Regan JM. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;77:393-402.   DOI
24 Aelterman P, Rabaey K, Pham HT, Boon N, Verstraete W. Continuous electricity generation at high voltages and currents using stacked microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:3388-3394.   DOI
25 Jung SP. Practical implementation of microbial fuel cells for bioelectrochemical wastewater treatment. J. Korean Soc. Urban Environ. 2013;13:93-100.
26 Logan BE. Peer reviewed: Extracting hydrogen and electricity from renewable resources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:160A-167A.   DOI
27 Lovley DR. Bug juice: Harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;4:497-508.   DOI
28 Rabaey K, Verstraete W. Microbial fuel cells: Novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:291-298.   DOI
29 Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, et al. Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environm. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:5181-5192.   DOI
30 Lee T, Okamoto A, Jung S, et al. Microbial electrochemical technologies producing electricity and valuable chemicals from biodegradation of waste organic matters. In: Yates M NC, Miller R, Pillai S, eds. Manual of environmental microbiology. 4th ed. American Society of Microbiology; 2016. p. 5.1.4-1-5.1.4-14.
31 Logan BE, Regan JM. Microbial fuel cells-challenges and applications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:5172-5180.   DOI
32 Zhang F, Merrill MD, Tokash JC, et al. Mesh optimization for microbial fuel cell cathodes constructed around stainless steel mesh current collectors. J. Power Sources 2011;196:1097-1102.   DOI
33 Oh S, Min B, Logan BE. Cathode performance as a factor in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:4900-4904.   DOI
34 Zhang F, Saito T, Cheng S, Hickner MA, Logan BE. Microbial fuel cell cathodes with poly (dimethylsiloxane) diffusion layers constructed around stainless steel mesh current collectors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:1490-1495.   DOI
35 Zuo Y, Cheng S, Logan BE. Ion exchange membrane cathodes for scalable microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:6967-6972.   DOI
36 Dong H, Yu H, Wang X. Catalysis kinetics and porous analysis of rolling activated carbon-PTFE air-cathode in microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:13009-13015.   DOI
37 Wang X, Feng C, Ding N, et al. Accelerated $OH^-$ transport in activated carbon air cathode by modification of quaternary ammonium for microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:4191-4198.   DOI