Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.065

Water treatment sludge for removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater  

Ghorpade, Anujkumar (Civil Engineering Department, S V National Institute of Technology)
Ahammed, M. Mansoor (Civil Engineering Department, S V National Institute of Technology)
Publication Information
Abstract
Suitability of aluminium-based water treatment sludge (WTS), a waste product from water treatment facilities, was assessed for removal of heavy metals from an electroplating wastewater which had high concentrations of copper and chromium along with other heavy metals. Batch tests with simulated wastewater in single- and multi-metal solutions indicated the influence of initial pH and WTS dose on removal of six metals namely Cu(II), Co(II), Cr(VI), Hg(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II). In general, removal of cationic metals such as Pb(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) increased with increase in pH while that of anionic Cr(VI) showed a reduction with increased pH values. Tests with multi-metal solution showed that the influence of competition was more pronounced at lower WTS dosages. Column test with diluted (100 times) real electroplating wastewater showed complete removal of copper up to 100 bed volumes while chromium removal ranged between 78-92%. Other metals which were present in lower concentrations were also effectively removed. Mass balance for copper and chromium showed that the WTS media had Cu(II) and Cr(VI) sorption capacities of about 1.7 and 3.5 mg/g of dried sludge, respectively. The study thus indicates that WTS has the potential to be used as a filtration/adsorption medium for removal of metals from metal-bearing wastewaters.
Keywords
Electroplating wastewater; Heavy metals; Sludge reuse; Water treatment sludge;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gibbons MK, Gagnon GA. Adsorption of arsenic from a Nova Scotia groundwater onto water treatment residual solids. Water Res. 2010;44:5740-5749.   DOI
2 Makris KC, Sarkar D, Datta R. Evaluating a drinking-water waste by-product as a novel sorbent for arsenic. Chemosphere 2006;64:730-741.   DOI
3 Zhou YF, Haynes RJ. Removal of Pb(II), Cr(III) and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using alum-derived water treatment sludge. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011;215:631-643.
4 Putra RS, Tanaka S. Aluminum drinking water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs) as an entrapping zone for lead in soil by electrokinetic remediation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011;79:208-215.   DOI
5 Irawan C, Liu JC, Wu C. Removal of boron using aluminum- based water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs). Desalination 2011;276:322-327.   DOI
6 Hovsepyan A, Bonzongo JJ. Aluminum drinking water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs) as sorbent for mercury: Implications for soil remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;164:73-80.   DOI
7 Castaldi P, Silvetti M, Garau G, Demurtas D, Deiana S. Copper(II) and lead(II) removal from aqueous solution by water treatment residues. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015;283:140-147.   DOI
8 Caporale AG, Punamiya P, Pigna M, Violante A, Sarkar D. Effect of particle size of drinking-water treatment residuals on the sorption of arsenic in the presence of competing ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013;260:644-651.   DOI
9 USEPA. Method 3050B: Acid digestion of sediment, sludge and soils. 2nd ed. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., USA; 1996.
10 Ippolito JA, Barbarick KA, Elliott HA. Drinking water treatment residuals: A review of recent uses. J. Environ. Qual. 2011;40:1-12.   DOI
11 Mehdi SS, Khataee A, Joo SW. Kinetics and equilibrium studies on removal of an azo dye from aqueous solution by adsorption onto scallop. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014;20:610-618.
12 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. In: Clescerl LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD, eds. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/ Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C., USA; 1998.
13 Sparks DL. Environmental soil chemistry. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press; 2003.
14 Yang W, Tang Q, Wei J, Ran Y, Chai L, Wang H. Enhanced removal of Cd(II) and Pb(II) by composites of mesoporouscarbon stabilized alumina. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016;369:215-223.   DOI
15 Coruh S, Senel G, Ergun ON. A comparison of the properties of natural clinoptilolites and their ion-exchange capacities for silver removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;180:486-492.
16 Elzinga EJ, Sparks DL. Reaction condition effects on nickel sorption mechanisms in illite-water suspensions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001;65:94-101.   DOI
17 Ghosh A, Dastidar MG, Sreekrishnan TR. Recent advances in bioremediation of heavy metals and metal complex dyes: Review. J. Environ. Eng. 2016;142:1-14.
18 Lee CI, Yang WF, Chiou CS. Utilization of water clarifier sludge for copper removal in a liquid fluidized-bed reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006;129:58-63.   DOI
19 Matis KA, Zouboulis AI, Gallios GP, Erwe T, Blocher C. Application of flotation for the separation of metal-loaded zeolites. Chemosphere 2004;55:65-72.   DOI
20 Teh CY, Budiman PM, Shak KPY, Wu TY. Recent advancement of coagulation-flocculation and its application in wastewater treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016;55:4363-4389.   DOI
21 Teh CY, Wu TY. The potential use of natural coagulants and flocculants in the treatment of urban waters. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014;39:1603-1608.
22 Natarajan R, Manivasagan R. Biosorptive removal of heavy metal onto raw activated sludge: Parametric, equilibrium, and kinetic studies. J. Environ. Eng. 2016;142:1-6.
23 Febrianto J, Kosasih AN, Sunarso J, Ju YH, Indraswati N, Ismadji S. Equilibrium and kinetic studies in adsorption of heavy metals using biosorbent: A summary of recent studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;162:616-645.
24 Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manage. 2011;92:407-418.   DOI
25 Makris KC, Sarkar D, Parsons JG, Datta R. X-ray absorption spectroscopy as a tool investigating arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) sorption by an aluminium-based drinking-water treatment residual. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;171:980-986.   DOI
26 Ahmad T, Ahmad K, Alam M. Sustainable management of water treatment sludge through 3'R' concept. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;124:1-10.   DOI
27 Babatunde AO, Zhao YQ. Constructive approaches toward water treatment works sludge management: An international review of beneficial re-uses. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;37:129-164.
28 Ippolito JA, Scheckel KG, Barbarick KA. Selenium adsorption to aluminum-based water treatment residuals. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;338:48-55.   DOI
29 Makris KC, O'Connor GA. Beneficial utilization of drinking- water treatment residuals as contaminant-mitigating agents. In: Sarkar D, Datta R, Hannigan R, eds. Developments in environmental science, concepts and applications in environmental geochemistry, vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sciences; 2007. p. 607-636.
30 Shak KPY, Wu TY. Optimized use of alum together with unmodified Cassia obtusifolia seed gum as a coagulant aid in treatment of palm oil mill effluent under natural pH of wastewater. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;76:1169-1178.   DOI
31 Muisa N, Hoko Z, Chifamba P. Impacts of alum residues from Morton Jaffray Water Works on water quality and fish, Harare, Zimbabwe. Phys. Chem. Earth 2011;36:853-864.   DOI
32 Nair AT, Ahammed MM. Coagulant recovery from water treatment plant sludge and reuse in post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent treating municipal wastewater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:10407-10418.   DOI
33 Makris KC, Harris WG, O'Connor GA, Obreza TA. Phosphorus immobilization in micropores of drinkingwater treatment residuals: Implications for long-term stability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:6590-6596.   DOI