Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.110

Use of biofilter as pre-treatment of polluted river water for drinking water supply  

Suprihatin, Suprihatin (Division of Environmental Engineering and Management, Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University IPB Dramaga Campus)
Cahyaputri, Bunga (Division of Environmental Engineering and Management, Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University IPB Dramaga Campus)
Romli, Muhammad (Division of Environmental Engineering and Management, Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University IPB Dramaga Campus)
Yani, Mohamad (Division of Environmental Engineering and Management, Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University IPB Dramaga Campus)
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.22, no.2, 2017 , pp. 203-209 More about this Journal
Abstract
Innovations in the biofiltration process can provide effective solutions to overcome crucial water pollution problems. The elimination of pollutants is a result of the combined effects of biological oxidation, adsorption and filtration processes. This research aims to evaluate the performance of quartz sand biofiltration for removing total suspended solids, turbidity, color, organic matter, and ammonium from polluted river water and develop an empirical model for designing quartz sand biofilters for the treatment of polluted river water. Experiments were conducted using two biofilter units filled with quartz sand as filter media. A set of experiments were performed to evaluate the effect of hydraulic retention time on biofilter performance in removing water contaminants. The kinetics of organic matter removal were also determined to describe the performance of the biofilter. The results show that biofiltration can significantly remove river water pollutants. Removal efficiency depends on the applied hydraulic retention time. At a hydraulic retention time of two hours, removal efficiencies of total organics, ammonium and total suspended solids were up to 78%, 82%, and 91%, respectively. A model for designing quartz sand biofiltration has been developed from the experimental data.
Keywords
Biofiltration; Organics removal; Pollutted river water; Pre-treatment; Raw water;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Shareefdeen ZM, Ahmed W, Aidan A. Kinetics and modeling of $H_2S$ removal in a novel biofilter. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011;1:72-76.   DOI
2 Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, et al. Integrated aquaculture: Rationale, evolution, and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 2004;231: 361-391.   DOI
3 Matilainen A, Sillanpaa M. Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes (Review paper). Chemosphere 2010;80:351-365.   DOI
4 Baig SA, Mahmood Q, Nawab B, Shafqat MN, Pervez A. Improvement of drinking water quality by using plant biomass through household biosand filter-A decentralized approach. Ecol. Eng. 2011;37:1842-1848.   DOI
5 Timmer G, Albrecht JJ, Richter H. The biofiltration as method for wastewater treatment and pesticides removal (in German). Korrespondenz Abwasser 1993;5:764-780.
6 Hsu CH, Jeng WL, Chang RM, Chien L, Han BC. Estimation of potential lifetime cancer risks for trihalomethanes from consuming chlorinated drinking water in Taiwan. Environ. Res. 2011;85:77-82.
7 Widayat W, Suprihatin S, Herlambang A. Removal of ammonia for the raw water quality improvement of water treatment plant Bojong Renged by using biofiltration with plastic media of hornet nest type (in Bahasa Indonesia). J. Air Indonesia 2010;6:64-75.
8 Grady CPL, Lim HC. Biological wastewater treatment: Theory and applications. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1980. p. 787-831.
9 Pleha SV. Biofiltration as second biological stage (in German). Korrespondenz Abwasser 1987;3:230-234.
10 Jou CJ, Huang GC. A pilot study for oil refinery wastewater treatment using a fixed film bioreactor. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003;7:463-469.   DOI
11 Eker S, Kargi F. COD, para-chlorophenol and toxicity removal from synthetic wastewater using rotating tubes biofilm reactor (RTBR). Bioresource Technol. 2010;101:9020-9024.   DOI
12 Sheth N, Dave S. Enhanced biodegradation of Reactive Violet 5R manufacturing wastewater using down flow fixed film bioreactor. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101:8627-8631.   DOI
13 Li HQ, Han HJ, Du MA, Wang W. Removal of phenols, thiocyanate and ammonium from coal gasification wastewater using moving bed biofilm reactor. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102:4667-4673.   DOI
14 Indonesian Government Regulation No. 82 Year 2001 on Water Quality Management and Control of Environmental Pollution. Jakarta. c2016 [cited 21 Mei 2016]. Available from: http://jdih.menlh.go.id/pdf/ind/IND-PUU-3-2001-lLampiran.pdf.
15 Ramirez-Lopez EM, Corona-Hernandez J, Avelar-Gonzalez FJ, Omil F, Thalasso F. Biofiltration of methanol in an organic biofilter using peanut shells as medium. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101:87-91.   DOI
16 APHA [American Public Health Association]. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. In: Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, eds. Washington D.C.: APHA, AWWA, WEF; 2012. p. 2.5-5.18.